When doing all grains, and the recipe calls for just pouring boiling water into the mash tun; will it hurt your efforts if you end up cooking your grains anyway? I have a tendency to go to long on cooks rather than too short simply because I want to make sure they've gelled, etc. I haven't noticed anything harmful in my results, but I want to learn all I can and I don't want to unknowingly hurt my results. Forgetting the savings in time, does it hurt too cook grain even if the recipe calls for less cooking or just using boiling water? (While being sure to still cook to strike temperatures, etc). Thanks,
GSugg
Does it hurt to cook regardless?
Moderator: Site Moderator
- der wo
- Master of Distillation
- Posts: 3817
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2015 2:40 am
- Location: Rote Flora, Hamburg
Re: Does it hurt to cook regardless?
You are writing about corn, right?
Pouring boiling water to grain has less danger of scorching than bringing a mash to boil. If you are able to heat up without scorching, for example by using an electrical stirrer, it's the better way. Mashing in grain in cold water clumps less and gelling is more complete, if you boil it instead of the around 90°C you get with pouring boiling water.
Pouring boiling water to grain has less danger of scorching than bringing a mash to boil. If you are able to heat up without scorching, for example by using an electrical stirrer, it's the better way. Mashing in grain in cold water clumps less and gelling is more complete, if you boil it instead of the around 90°C you get with pouring boiling water.
In this way, imperialism brings catastrophe as a mode of existence back from the periphery of capitalist development to its point of departure. - Rosa Luxemburg