Why not Red Oak?

Other discussions for folks new to the wonderful craft of home distilling.

Moderator: Site Moderator

GBMorris
Novice
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 7:46 pm
Location: Canada

Why not Red Oak?

Post by GBMorris »

Lots of folks talk about using white oak chips to impart oakiness to spirits, but why not red oak? Is it just because white oak is used in barrels? I happen to have access to a large supply of red oak chips and would like to use these if I can.

Thanks!
Jack of all trades, master of one.
User avatar
bearriver
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 4442
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 10:17 pm
Location: Western Washington

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by bearriver »

Why not?

Do a small amount it and give us detailed results. Ive heard of folks trying different woods and loving it. One reason white oak is preferred is beacuse of the lack of flavour, so I hear. So expect some stronger or more flavourful results would be my guess.

Go on over to the welcome center and introduce yourself.
zombie911
Novice
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 7:44 pm
Location: SwampLand Fl

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by zombie911 »

There are sugars in Red Oak that can become toxic when mixed with ethanol. Xenol or something like that.
User avatar
S-Cackalacky
retired
Posts: 5990
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 4:35 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by S-Cackalacky »

zombie911 wrote:There are sugars in Red Oak that can become toxic when mixed with ethanol. Xenol or something like that.
I've read something like that also. There are at least a couple of threads here somewhere that talk about alternative woods for aging. One of the threads included a link to a chart that outlined the qualities (and toxidity) of different woods.

S-C
Every new member should read this before doing anything else:
bellybuster
Master of Distillation
Posts: 4490
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 5:00 pm

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by bellybuster »

I use red oak in with cherry, awesome drink comes out of it.
Red oak is much higher in tannins than white but keeping the ABV in around 55% seems to minimize the tannins pulled. I did some at 62% and wasn't overly impressed
Washashore
Distiller
Posts: 1055
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 5:40 pm
Location: New England

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by Washashore »

Red oak is fine but will give you a different flavor profile than white. White oaks have a much denser cellular structure than red oaks making them much better for holding liquids when fashioned into barrels (although, from an historical perspective, white oak was one of the most widely available species and relatively cheap).

With that said, white oak has FAR less tannins and FAR more oak lactones (vanillin and coconut flavors) than red oak, making it much more desirable for aging whiskey.
"It's hard to argue with the government. Remember, they run the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, so they must know a thing or two about satisfying women." --- Scott Adams
Washashore
Distiller
Posts: 1055
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 5:40 pm
Location: New England

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by Washashore »

zombie911 wrote:There are sugars in Red Oak that can become toxic when mixed with ethanol. Xenol or something like that.

Ummmmm..... What? :?:
"It's hard to argue with the government. Remember, they run the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, so they must know a thing or two about satisfying women." --- Scott Adams
red dirt shiner
Novice
Posts: 85
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 10:28 am

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by red dirt shiner »

I have used red oak with great success before.I have also had epic fails with it.sometimes you get a distinct cat piss flavor from it.what I've learned so far is the larger the tree the better. Only use heart wood branches give off the cat piss flavor.white oak is always good but playing around is 1/2 the fun of this hobby so let us know how it works out for you.
Fastill
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 898
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 6:28 pm
Location: Where we drink more beer than you!

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by Fastill »

Way too many species of red oak to discount all of them. Some work ok and some, like scrub or piss oak as we call it, smells like rotten diapers when cut or burned. I use straight grained red oak once in a while and though not an unpleasant flavor, it is not as good as white oak or used barrel staves of white oak.
A.D.D. and HD don't go together. This hobby takes time and dedication to learn and do it right and safe.
Fill the pool before you jump in head first!
http://homedistiller.org/forum/viewtopi ... 15&t=52975
User avatar
shadylane
Master of Distillation
Posts: 10364
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:54 pm
Location: Hiding In the Boiler room of the Insane asylum

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by shadylane »

Ya beat me to it fastill.
I worked at a sawmill in the 1960's, red oak was known as piss oak.
But, it did a good job of masking the smell coming from all the mash barrels located near by.
User avatar
humbledore
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 898
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 1:12 pm
Location: The third coast

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by humbledore »

OK so here's one. I have about 100 black oaks on my property, and just one or two white oaks. Black oak is as common as white around here yet I never hear it mentioned. Any experience with it?
User avatar
humbledore
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 898
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 1:12 pm
Location: The third coast

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by humbledore »

Found this: Quercus velutina, the eastern black oak or more commonly known as simply black oak, is an oak in the red oak (Quercus sect. Lobatae) group of oaks. It is native to eastern North America from southern Ontario south to northern Florida and southern Maine west to northeastern Texas.

Sounds like a variant of red oak.
User avatar
bearriver
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 4442
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 10:17 pm
Location: Western Washington

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by bearriver »

zombie911 wrote:There are sugars in Red Oak that can become toxic when mixed with ethanol. Xenol or something like that.

Forget about that. This user has been spreading some very questionable advice....

Winerys are known to age in red oak. Its common, and safe.
zombie911
Novice
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 7:44 pm
Location: SwampLand Fl

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by zombie911 »

bearriver wrote:
zombie911 wrote:There are sugars in Red Oak that can become toxic when mixed with ethanol. Xenol or something like that.

Forget about that. This user has been spreading some very questionable advice....

Winerys are known to age in red oak. Its common, and safe.
Introduction

Interactive

All poisonous plants by Botanical name

All poisonous plants by Common name

Important WWW Poisonous Plants sites



Notes on poisoning: red oak

General poisoning notes:

Red oak (Quercus rubra) is a native tree found in eastern Canada. This plant contains toxic tannins that have caused poisoning and death in cattle and horses. Sheep may have also been poisoned by this oak. Poisoning can lead to depression, anorexia, loss of condition, and kidney damage. Kidney failure usually results in death (Duncan 1961, Cockerill and Beasley 1979).

References:

Cockrill, J. M., Beasley, J. N. 1979. Renal damage to cattle during acorn poisoning. Vet. Med. Small Anim. Clin., 74: 82, 84-85.

Duncan, C. S. 1961. Oak leaf poisoning in two horses. Cornell Vet., 51: 159-162.

Nomenclature:

Scientific Name: Quercus rubra L.

Vernacular name(s): red oak

Scientific family name: Fagaceae

Vernacular family name: beech

Go to ITIS*ca for more taxonomic information on: Quercus rubra

Hate the game... Not the player. Research what you post
User avatar
Jimbo
retired
Posts: 8423
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:19 pm
Location: Down the road a piece.

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by Jimbo »

Toxicity
Edit:
The leaves and acorns of the oak tree are poisonous to cattle, horses, sheep, and goats in large amounts due to the toxin tannic acid, and cause kidney damage and gastroenteritis. Additionally, once livestock have a taste for the leaves and acorns, they may seek them out.[clarification needed][citation needed] Symptoms of poisoning include lack of appetite, depression, constipation, diarrhea (which may contain blood), blood in urine, and colic.

I dunno about you guys, but I dont age my hooch on leaves and acorns. I have heard from folks here on HD that red oak can make your hooch smell like cat piss. From some of the smells I get during woodworking red oak I can see that. But have no direct experience with hooch and red oak myself. The experience from the other HD folks mentioned above is enough to keep me away.
In theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice there is.
My Bourbon and Single Malt recipes. Apple Stuff and Electric Conversion
User avatar
S-Cackalacky
retired
Posts: 5990
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 4:35 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by S-Cackalacky »

I did a little research about red oak toxicity and found that most of the charts only refer to oak in general. Oak in general can be an eye and skin irritant and also display asthma type symptoms from exposure to the dust. The only thing I found specific to red oak toxicity was related to new growth, roots, and acorns - nothing about toxicity related to the heart wood. Red oak toxicity was also described as most commonly affecting cattle. The research I did was very cursorary. I would suggest that if anyone still has concerns about using it, they do their own research.

The only thing I would suggest is that any wood used for aging be well seasoned (a year or more), or kiln dried, before using it. I recently used some apple wood BBQ chips to nuke age some sweet feed that seemed not to be quite right. It would produce foam when vigorously shaken and left the likker a little cloudy. I don't know if this is a common property of apple wood, or maybe it wasn't sufficiently seasoned before it was chipped and bagged. Anyway, be careful what you use.

Just sayin',
S-C

Posted while Zombie911 and Jimbo were posting.
Every new member should read this before doing anything else:
User avatar
Jimbo
retired
Posts: 8423
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:19 pm
Location: Down the road a piece.

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by Jimbo »

S-Cackalacky wrote: I recently used some apple wood BBQ chips to nuke age some sweet feed that seemed not to be quite right. It would produce foam when vigorously shaken and left the likker a little cloudy. I don't know if this is a common property of apple wood, or maybe it wasn't sufficiently seasoned before it was chipped and bagged. Anyway, be careful what you use.

Just sayin',
S-C
Ive got some apple wood on some apple brandy now. I toasted and lightly charred it. No foaming or cloudyness. The caramel color is there but lighter than the same stuff on oak. The flavor is intriguing.
In theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice there is.
My Bourbon and Single Malt recipes. Apple Stuff and Electric Conversion
User avatar
S-Cackalacky
retired
Posts: 5990
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 4:35 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by S-Cackalacky »

Jimbo wrote:
S-Cackalacky wrote: I recently used some apple wood BBQ chips to nuke age some sweet feed that seemed not to be quite right. It would produce foam when vigorously shaken and left the likker a little cloudy. I don't know if this is a common property of apple wood, or maybe it wasn't sufficiently seasoned before it was chipped and bagged. Anyway, be careful what you use.

Just sayin',
S-C
Ive got some apple wood on some apple brandy now. I toasted and lightly charred it. No foaming or cloudyness. The caramel color is there but lighter than the same stuff on oak. The flavor is intriguing.
Thanks Jimbo. I think I'll put the chips in the oven at low temp for a few hours and then leave them out to air dry for a few more days and try it again. I think I may have over charred it as well. When I tasted it, it was like lickin' the inside of a BBQ pit. I also did a jar on pecan chips and it turned out very clear and well colored - over charred, but looked nice. Next batch I think I'll just toast and let it go at that.

Thanks,
S-C
Every new member should read this before doing anything else:
Soggy Bottom Boy
Rumrunner
Posts: 746
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2012 4:43 pm
Location: Somewhere to the north of the.. ..Peoples Яepublik of Kalifoяnia

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by Soggy Bottom Boy »

Some woods are quite toxic, most have to do with inhalation of dust and the related damage to the lungs(from minor irritation to cancer), and some are also related to skin contact (redness, rash, even blistering). Desert Ironwood from the Southwestern U.S. and Mexico is a good example of this, and cocobolo from Central America.

Northeastern Ironwood, the leaves and seed pods are poisonous to eat.

Then again, Ironwood in Australia is used for medicinal purposes, not sure what part of the tree is used for that. ....and the seeping sap is used as an outback bush dwellers treat to chew on.

So, even woods with a common sounding name can be very different from each other, and in fact can be of different genera entirely.

I have not actually seen any information of "wood" being poisonous due to ingestion, though I would venture a guess, there are undoubtedly a few of those out there.

Personally, I would stay away from any Central or South American hardwoods, they have some strange oils in them. Someone recently posted about maybe using Mesquite for aging, ....um, proceed at your own risk! Most things that grow or live in the Southwestern U.S. and Mexican desert have survived for thousands of years by being poisonous to other species in some way or other. Me, I'll stick with the centuries old standby, French and American white oak.

Maybe after I am tired of life, I will branch out (pun intended) and try cherry wood and a few others. :lol:
"Well, ......I don't want Fop, goddamn it! I'm a Dapper Dan man!" ...Ulysses Everett McGill

"Good thing you found HD. It's like the mythbusters of distilling." ...Prairiepiss
User avatar
Jimbo
retired
Posts: 8423
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:19 pm
Location: Down the road a piece.

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by Jimbo »

Walnut is toxic also. Cannot use walnut shavings for animal bedding. And walnut dust wreaks havoc on the lungs.
In theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice there is.
My Bourbon and Single Malt recipes. Apple Stuff and Electric Conversion
User avatar
Truckinbutch
Angel's Share
Angel's Share
Posts: 8107
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 12:49 pm

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by Truckinbutch »

Jimbo wrote:Walnut is toxic also. Cannot use walnut shavings for animal bedding. And walnut dust wreaks havoc on the lungs.
Yup ! And red oaks that are being sawed at the mill can leave your eyes terribly irritated from the sawdust if you happen to get some in your eye while sawing . Wild cherry sawdust will leach cyanide from a mill pile and poison streams over time .
I stick with proven white oak as a personal preference .
If you ain't the lead dog in the team , the scenery never changes . Ga Flatwoods made my avatar and I want to thank him for that .
Don't drink water , fish fornicate in it .
User avatar
Halfbaked
retired
Posts: 3398
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 5:51 pm

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by Halfbaked »

Jimbo wrote:Walnut is toxic also. Cannot use walnut shavings for animal bedding. And walnut dust wreaks havoc on the lungs.
Sickest I have ever been was when I was working on the lathe with Walnut.
Wild cherry on the other hand is toxic to cattle. It is weird. If you cut a wild cherry tree down in the field and the cows eat the wilted leaves they are as good as dead.
User avatar
Truckinbutch
Angel's Share
Angel's Share
Posts: 8107
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 12:49 pm

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by Truckinbutch »

halfbaked wrote:
Jimbo wrote:Walnut is toxic also. Cannot use walnut shavings for animal bedding. And walnut dust wreaks havoc on the lungs.
Sickest I have ever been was when I was working on the lathe with Walnut.
Wild cherry on the other hand is toxic to cattle. It is weird. If you cut a wild cherry tree down in the field and the cows eat the wilted leaves they are as good as dead.
YOUBETCHA on wilted cherry being toxic to cows . And horses , too . Buried several that got exposed by accident . Both horses and cows . Seems that when wild cherry is most toxic is when it tastes the best to critters .
If you ain't the lead dog in the team , the scenery never changes . Ga Flatwoods made my avatar and I want to thank him for that .
Don't drink water , fish fornicate in it .
User avatar
NC_redcock
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2013 10:04 pm
Location: NC Foothills

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by NC_redcock »

If I was to put some white oak in some jars to age, how big should the pieces be and what's the best way to prepare them? Been wanting to age some of the corn whiskey I've made and I have an abundance of seasoned white oak that I burn for firewood.
Well in North Carolina way back in the hills lived old pappy an' he had him a still...
User avatar
MitchyBourbon
Distiller
Posts: 2304
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:03 pm

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by MitchyBourbon »

I buy sticks at my lbs. Make the the size that fits your aging vessel. I do re-char the sticks after each use. I use a butane kitchen torch for that.
I'm goin the distance...
User avatar
NC_redcock
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2013 10:04 pm
Location: NC Foothills

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by NC_redcock »

Thanks MB, I'll give it a whirl, say I cut some 6 inch long sticks, pencil size, how many per jar should I use?
Well in North Carolina way back in the hills lived old pappy an' he had him a still...
User avatar
bearriver
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 4442
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 10:17 pm
Location: Western Washington

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by bearriver »

My brother almost died logging wood. Respiratory issues.

There is a stickied thread all about where to find white oak. (Taking that advice tomorrow myself)

I can see experimenting with the wrong wood going south in a hurry. I agree its probably safest to find ya some white oak. Im going to leave the experimentin to Jimbo ova dare.....
User avatar
Halfbaked
retired
Posts: 3398
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 5:51 pm

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by Halfbaked »

Most suggest to put sticks in a 400 degree oven for 2 or 3 hours and then char them. I have used and recommend 1x1x5 sticks. 1 per quart. It works out pretty good. 1 stick in a quart leaves you with a 1/5 of likker when you take the stick out. I have also found out good clean likker seems to age a little quicker than not so clean likker.
User avatar
Jimbo
retired
Posts: 8423
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:19 pm
Location: Down the road a piece.

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by Jimbo »

bearriver wrote: Im going to leave the experimentin to Jimbo ova dare.....
Naw, not I mcfly. Aside from a little bit of brandy on some apple wood Im all white oak. I have experimented with different oaks tho, Hungarian, French and American. I tried like hell to observe what the experts claim are the differences, but alas, I dont think my tongue is sophisticated enough. They all taste caramelly and vanilla to me.
In theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice there is.
My Bourbon and Single Malt recipes. Apple Stuff and Electric Conversion
User avatar
NC_redcock
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2013 10:04 pm
Location: NC Foothills

Re: Why not Red Oak?

Post by NC_redcock »

halfbaked wrote:Most suggest to put sticks in a 400 degree oven for 2 or 3 hours and then char them. I have used and recommend 1x1x5 sticks. 1 per quart. It works out pretty good. 1 stick in a quart leaves you with a 1/5 of likker when you take the stick out. I have also found out good clean likker seems to age a little quicker than not so clean likker.
Appreciate the info, I'll calibrate my hatchet...
Well in North Carolina way back in the hills lived old pappy an' he had him a still...
Post Reply