Instantaneous RR Measurement Experiment 2

Vapor, Liquid or Cooling Management. Flutes, plates, etc.

Moderator: Site Moderator

Post Reply
Maritimer
Rumrunner
Posts: 716
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 6:09 am
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada

Instantaneous RR Measurement Experiment 2

Post by Maritimer »

The still:
instrumented still.jpg
The boiler:
view of open boiler.jpg
The electronics:
view of electronics.jpg
For Experiment 2, I've used the new digitally-controlled-power power supply. Temperature sensors are on the input to the product condenser, in the tubing connecting the product condenser to the reflux condenser, and at the output of the reflux condenser. The three sensors go to two instrumentation amplifiers (which take the difference of the individual temperatures), where the output of the first one is the temperature difference across the reflux condenser, and the output of the second one is the difference between the input to the product condenser and the output of the reflux condenser (across the whole shebang).

The RR is then measured as (temperature difference across reflux condenser)/(temperature difference across the product and the reflux condensers together).

The two temperature differences were then input to two channels of the analogue-to-digital converter (ADC) of the microcontroller. The RR was calculated using the converted digital values which were sent to a HyperTerminal and also converted to a pulse-width-modulated waveform, which, when filtered, produces a DC voltage. The DC voltage was then sent to an oscilloscope to watch the RR calculation in real time.

The results were exactly as predicted, within +/-2%. (This is due to the digitization of the analogue signal. I didn't provide enough gain in the instrumentation amplifers, so only 7 bits were used. Suppose the quantized level is 100, but it could be 101 or 99 with a little push. When we divide 101 by 99 as would be done in the RR equation, we get 1.0202, or 2% up. Similrly, if we had 99/101=0.9802, or 2% down. More gain would provide more accuracy.) Decreasing the coolant flow rate caused a transient that came back to the same value:
decreasing coolant flow rate.jpg
The two horizontal lines represent RR=0 and RR=1.0.
And increasing it again caused another transient:
increasing the flow rate back to original.jpg
Changing the power level also caused a transient and an return to the original RR:
changing the power level.jpg
I don't remember if this was an increase or decrease.

So, the technique works very well. Q.E.D. and all that!

M
NcHooch
retired
Posts: 1939
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 8:40 pm
Location: The Ol' North State

Re: Instantaneous RR Measurement Experiment 2

Post by NcHooch »

Sry , but whats RR?
:oops:
NChooch
Practice safe distillin and keep your hobby under your hat.
User avatar
LWTCS
Site Mod
Posts: 13009
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:04 pm
Location: Treasure Coast

Re: Instantaneous RR Measurement Experiment 2

Post by LWTCS »

RR= reflux ratio
Trample the injured and hurdle the dead.
Post Reply