Parent Site Calculator Accuracy For Commercial Stills

Place for craft/micro distillers in all stages of build to show and share.

Moderator: Site Moderator

Post Reply
palinkagus
Novice
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 4:22 pm
Location: Da Boogie Down

Parent Site Calculator Accuracy For Commercial Stills

Post by palinkagus »

Hello all,

I would like to start off and say thank you for all of the inspiration I have received from this forum over the years. Due to the knowledge gained here and the assistance of my partners, we are opening our craft distillery, Copper Kettle Spirits in Freehold, NJ! We will be entering the market with our vodka and coconut rum. We have our TTB permit are looking to go live early this summer.

I am designing a vapor management still for our vodka production. I've been plugging my numbers into the parent site calculators, but I wanted to check to see if anyone else has used that resource for a large still. I have a 250 gallon Bain Marie boiler with 33,000 watts worth of heating elements.

Any input would be greatly appreciated!!
User avatar
pfshine
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 3106
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 10:59 pm
Location: Vegas

Re: Parent Site Calculator Accuracy For Commercial Stills

Post by pfshine »

Congratulations on the startup. As for the calc it should be bang on for heat up. The dilution might get wonky on ya due to exothermic reaction when adding water.
Life is a journey you take alone. Make sure you do what you what makes you happy
palinkagus
Novice
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 4:22 pm
Location: Da Boogie Down

Re: Parent Site Calculator Accuracy For Commercial Stills

Post by palinkagus »

Thanks pfshine! I'm looking to make a 6" column with 2.75 meters of copper mesh packing and a 4" product take off and condenser. I'm a little confused with the condenser sizing calc. results for the reflux condenser. Are those results accurate for a reflux condenser or only product condensers?
rad14701
retired
Posts: 20865
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 4:46 pm
Location: New York, USA

Re: Parent Site Calculator Accuracy For Commercial Stills

Post by rad14701 »

You're going to find that using copper or SS structured/mesh packing to be problematic on any column over 3" diameter as it compresses under its own weight once whetted... You'll be better off with a more rigid type of structured packing...
User avatar
Bushman
Admin
Posts: 17988
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 5:29 am
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Parent Site Calculator Accuracy For Commercial Stills

Post by Bushman »

rad14701 wrote:You're going to find that using copper or SS structured/mesh packing to be problematic on any column over 3" diameter as it compresses under its own weight once whetted... You'll be better off with a more rigid type of structured packing...
I agree but am not as conservative as Rad and would say anything over 4" but of course I don't run mine as often as a commercial set up would.
palinkagus
Novice
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 4:22 pm
Location: Da Boogie Down

Re: Parent Site Calculator Accuracy For Commercial Stills

Post by palinkagus »

I am looking to build the column with 20" spools, each with a support grid at the base of the spool to retain the packing above. Wouldn't this be sufficient to prevent the packing from compressing?
User avatar
pfshine
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 3106
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 10:59 pm
Location: Vegas

Re: Parent Site Calculator Accuracy For Commercial Stills

Post by pfshine »

Scoria/lava rock does wonders so I'm tole.
Life is a journey you take alone. Make sure you do what you what makes you happy
rad14701
retired
Posts: 20865
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 4:46 pm
Location: New York, USA

Re: Parent Site Calculator Accuracy For Commercial Stills

Post by rad14701 »

palinkagus wrote:I am looking to build the column with 20" spools, each with a support grid at the base of the spool to retain the packing above. Wouldn't this be sufficient to prevent the packing from compressing?
Whether or not you ended up with voidage at the top of each section is the subjective consideration here... Personally, I'd be going with a more rigid structured material like scoria/lava rock, marbles, ceramic saddles, raschig rings, or SPP...
User avatar
DAD300
Master of Distillation
Posts: 2839
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 11:46 am
Location: Southern U.S.

Re: Parent Site Calculator Accuracy For Commercial Stills

Post by DAD300 »

I see all the calculators as very good and accurate. I even use then to backdoor some calculations.

You can use your actual heat up times to estimate your actual watts or BTU's. This will get you to the efficiency of your gas burner.

EXCEPT, that product Condenser Size thing. Either it assumes something we don't know or it is way the frig off. I've tried a lot of calcs with it.

The only way it gets close is if you try to figure the watts of power getting to the condenser, not the watts under the pot!

Assume 3,000watts power at bottom of boiler, and a 75% efficiency (2,250) and a reflux condenser taking half of that (1,175) it says you need 30", comes close to most peoples actual experience.
CCVM http://homedistiller.org/forum/viewtopi ... d#p7104768" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
Ethyl Carbamate Docs viewtopic.php?f=6&t=55219&p=7309262&hil ... e#p7309262
DSP-AR-20005
palinkagus
Novice
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 4:22 pm
Location: Da Boogie Down

Re: Parent Site Calculator Accuracy For Commercial Stills

Post by palinkagus »

rad14701 wrote:Personally, I'd be going with a more rigid structured material like scoria/lava rock, marbles, ceramic saddles, raschig rings, or SPP...
Thanks for the input rad! My concern is that the more rigid materials require more column height than I have available, at least according to the calc's. In my mind's eye I can't see the scrubbies compressing to the point of being a problem as long as they are supported every 20" with a grid at the bottom of each column section. Am I off base here?
palinkagus
Novice
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 4:22 pm
Location: Da Boogie Down

Re: Parent Site Calculator Accuracy For Commercial Stills

Post by palinkagus »

DAD300 wrote:I see all the calculators as very good and accurate. I even use then to backdoor some calculations.

You can use your actual heat up times to estimate your actual watts or BTU's. This will get you to the efficiency of your gas burner.

EXCEPT, that product Condenser Size thing. Either it assumes something we don't know or it is way the frig off. I've tried a lot of calcs with it.

The only way it gets close is if you try to figure the watts of power getting to the condenser, not the watts under the pot!

Assume 3,000watts power at bottom of boiler, and a 75% efficiency (2,250) and a reflux condenser taking half of that (1,175) it says you need 30", comes close to most peoples actual experience.
Thanks DAD! My pot is a Bain Marie with 6-5,500 watt electric elements (33,000 watts total). Except for heat loss to the surrounding air I'm close to 100% efficient (am I right in saying that?). I would like to keep our water flow through the reflux condenser to a minimum (using municipal water for cooling). Based on those parameters, what would be the suggested size of the reflux condenser? (looking to go with a shotgun)
User avatar
bearriver
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 4442
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 10:17 pm
Location: Western Washington

Re: Parent Site Calculator Accuracy For Commercial Stills

Post by bearriver »

With that much juice you should be using an 8 inch column. 33k for stripping runs and warmup. 21k for spirit runs... Still Dragon's 8" dephlegmator is almost 9 inches long. 8-7/8". That's what I would buy/build.

All CM's that I have seen using a shell in a tube style dephlegmator have a length that is near equal to the diameter. For example a 4 inch dephlegmator typically is around 4 inches long. Longer just adds to the height and material cost.
User avatar
UnSub
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 165
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 4:04 pm

Re: Parent Site Calculator Accuracy For Commercial Stills

Post by UnSub »

palinkagus wrote:Thanks pfshine! I'm looking to make a 6" column with 2.75 meters of copper mesh packing and a 4" product take off and condenser. I'm a little confused with the condenser sizing calc. results for the reflux condenser. Are those results accurate for a reflux condenser or only product condensers?
Just a thought, if there is a packing compression issue; you can always use a rigid copper or stainless screen and make a Cin-a-bun like "cartridge. That would support it top to bottom, even in the inner most point of the packing.
User avatar
DAD300
Master of Distillation
Posts: 2839
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 11:46 am
Location: Southern U.S.

Re: Parent Site Calculator Accuracy For Commercial Stills

Post by DAD300 »

bearriver has good advice on the deplegmator.

There is a post elsewhere, 4" column using a CSST reflux condenser. 6" column you could use 1" o.d. CSST, 8 spirals/coils minimum, better order the 50' roll.

https://www.dudadiesel.com/choose_item. ... lexTube100" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
CCVM http://homedistiller.org/forum/viewtopi ... d#p7104768" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
Ethyl Carbamate Docs viewtopic.php?f=6&t=55219&p=7309262&hil ... e#p7309262
DSP-AR-20005
User avatar
bearriver
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 4442
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 10:17 pm
Location: Western Washington

Re: Parent Site Calculator Accuracy For Commercial Stills

Post by bearriver »

DAD300 wrote:There is a post elsewhere, 4" column using a CSST reflux condenser. 6" column you could use 1" o.d. CSST, 8 spirals/coils minimum, better order the 50' roll.
Good advice.

Perhaps this is the thread/post you are talking about?: http://ww.homedistiller.org/forum/viewt ... 2#p7383223" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
Post Reply