Assuming you are using the justly popular phase angle controller: On the output side you are measuring a clipped waveform which is not what most meters are designed for. They will work but be a bit inexact. A true RMS meter would be exact but is way too expensive for this. Becuase volts and amps are both changing at the same time neither one alone relates directly to the wattage. You have to read them both and mentally multiply them together, still a bit off becuase of the clipping. You could try using a wattmeter on the output but again it may not work too exactly. Measuring the input works with what the meters are designed for, a full sine wave. Hard to say 100% which is the more precise method but I strongly suspect input.
Precision metering is not really that critical though. Many folk manage perfectly well with a numbered dial around the pot and just learn by experience where to turn for each part of the run.
Where it is useful to have a standard system of measurement is sharing information with others to replicate results. One of the hubs of science. I believe it also makes that initial learning period easier and that it is easiest to understand the effect of twiddling the knob if you have a linear reading that relates directly to watts.
Measuring input is probably going to be the most precise you can reasonably get and is the easiest place to get a linear readout; a simple ammeter will do the job.
Because volts and resistance are both fixed here an ammeter IS a wattmeter. You could make your own simple linear scale for an analouge and read the watts directly. I don't expect anyone to do that, there is no need. I am just trying to push the point of what a direct relationship means.
Yes most people measure output becuase the same early designs are copied again and again and it seems the obvious and natural thing to do. You have that very urge right now. I still have it even though I know better. I am resisting, and may yet give in, the urge to also add a cheap £2 voltmeter to the output. Just to watch it change when I twiddle. In this instance though the intuitively obvious thing is not actually the best thing for the job at hand. It can be made to work and becomes entrenched as tradition becuse it just happened to be done that way by the pioneers who were learning themselves and stopped when they had a usable system so they could get on with the real work of making fine spirits. The history of science is full of similar situations. It's human.
Trust me, an ammeter on the input is an optimum for measuring watts easily and cheaply. I spent a few quid more for an actual watthour meter that gives a lot of options besides direct reading of watts, but that is just boyish bling to play with at £8.59 for added toy value. Waiting for it to arrive from China.
If you favour a burst fire controller then twiddling your knob will probably be fairly linear anyway. You won't be able to meter it very easily at all but a watthour meter on the input is your best bet.
I am using these as the heart of my controller.
- 100a 0-240v phase angle controller. Should stay cool and live long at £10.50. Item number:
190836678049 - image.jpg (14.48 KiB) Viewed 4792 times
- 100a Watt-hour meter Item number:
191219170003