caramel

Sugar, and all about sugar washes. Where the primary ingredient is sugar, and other things are just used as nutrients.

Moderator: Site Moderator

Post Reply
stoker
Distiller
Posts: 1093
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 9:16 am
Location: not there

caramel

Post by stoker »

did anyone try to ferment caramel (made yourselve by heating sugar) ?

can it be compared with molasses?

thanks
-I have too much blood in my alcohol system-
junkyard dawg

Post by junkyard dawg »

Caramel is made by heating sugar to high temperature. about 250 F I think... been a while...

Mollasses is a by product of making white granulated sugar. They are quite different.
Longhairedcountryboy
Swill Maker
Posts: 315
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 9:30 am
Location: Michigan

Post by Longhairedcountryboy »

Caramelizing sugar converts some of the sugar to carbon. I don't know what that would taste like if you fermented it. Probably not much like molasses. I guess there is one way to find out. It will probably ferment.
TN.Frank
Swill Maker
Posts: 215
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 11:33 am
Location: Tennessee, C.S.A.

Post by TN.Frank »

There was some unfermented sugar in the last wash I distilled and it carmelized in the cooker and gave the whiskey kind of a burnt/sweet sugar taste. While it's interesting I'm not going to try it again on porpose,LOL.
In God We Trust, All Others Pay Cash.
possum
Distiller
Posts: 1159
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 9:33 am
Location: small copper potstill with limestone water

Post by possum »

Ive seen in beers that the darker the MALT SUGAR, the less digestable.
Caramell may not be as small and simple of a sugar, it may be a mixture of things(molecules) either linked or unlinked.

The Organic chemestry is not my strong point. Caramell is soluable in hot water, but it dosent dissolve as easily as the granulated cane sugar.
Hey guys!!! Watch this.... OUCH!
The Chemist
Trainee
Posts: 966
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 1:29 pm
Location: Louisiana

Post by The Chemist »

Just the other day, I tested a commercial caramel (used in the beverage industry) for sugar. It is negligible. As to homemade caramel, I guess that would depend on how much you caramelize.
Purposeful motion, for one so insane...
jbrew9999

Post by jbrew9999 »

The Chemist wrote:Just the other day, I tested a commercial caramel (used in the beverage industry) for sugar. It is negligible. As to homemade caramel, I guess that would depend on how much you caramelize.
What do you mean by "It is negligible"? The difference in sugar content between caramel and plain sugar? the amount of sugar in caramel? something else?
stoker
Distiller
Posts: 1093
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 9:16 am
Location: not there

Post by stoker »

I caramelized it a bit too much, it had a burned smell.

and it is fermenting very good.
I'm exited for the result (after distillation with a potstill, ofcourse)

I did something very very stupid while melting the sugar, when it was ready and I guess at 200°C, I wanted to cool it down by adding an amount of water, and of course it evaportated imediately, and it got some caramel on my arm, with as result a 2° degree burning wound on my arm.
and I knew such thing can happen (adding water to acid and vice verca) :oops: :x
-I have too much blood in my alcohol system-
The Chemist
Trainee
Posts: 966
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 1:29 pm
Location: Louisiana

Post by The Chemist »

jbrew9999 wrote:
The Chemist wrote:Just the other day, I tested a commercial caramel (used in the beverage industry) for sugar. It is negligible. As to homemade caramel, I guess that would depend on how much you caramelize.
What do you mean by "It is negligible"? The difference in sugar content between caramel and plain sugar? the amount of sugar in caramel? something else?
I meant that it has no sugar, i.e. it gave a reading of 0.042 where 1g/L sucrose give 0.343. The reagent blank was 0.019, so the caramel did give a slight signal, but not relevent. (This was a dinitrosalicylic acid test, for those who might be interested. The numbers are the absorbance at 575 nanometers. The caramel was Williamson 055)
Purposeful motion, for one so insane...
Post Reply