H.R. 2903 is up to 83 co-sponsors...

Discussion and plans for legalizing our hobby.

Moderator: Site Moderator

SouthTexasShine
Novice
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 5:41 am

Re: H.R. 2903 is up to 83 co-sponsors...

Post by SouthTexasShine »

I saw that the tax law that was just signed included a lot of what HR 2903 included. Was any of the home distilling language included?

https://whiskycast.com/distillers-cheer ... m-changes/
User avatar
rgreen2002
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 1309
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 2:57 pm
Location: Northeastern USA

Re: H.R. 2903 is up to 83 co-sponsors...

Post by rgreen2002 »

SouthTexasShine wrote:I saw that the tax law that was just signed included a lot of what HR 2903 included. Was any of the home distilling language included?

https://whiskycast.com/distillers-cheer ... m-changes/
Doesn't look like it: S.236 - Craft Beverage Modernization and Tax Reform Act of 2017 . This is a copy of the Craft Beverage Modernization and Tax Reform Act of 2017 that the article mentioned was "folded in". It had nothing regarding home distilling. I still think the way to go is at the individual state level. Considering we had reps from multiple states it seems more feasible. IMHO. :mrgreen:
HD Glossary - Open this
A little spoon feeding *For New & Novice Distillers - start here
BEST WAY TO GET ANSWERS FROM HOME DISTILLER
"In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is."
Bearded-and-Bored
Novice
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 7:28 pm
Location: USA

Re: H.R. 2903 is up to 83 co-sponsors...

Post by Bearded-and-Bored »

I just read about it too. http://www.myrecordjournal.com/News/Sta ... taxes.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow

If I had a brewery or distillery I'd be over the moon about the new tax rules, but right now I'm pretty deflated. I just did a quick read through of the new tax bill's relevant sections (pages 520-531). No mention of home distilling, but notably the rules regarding home brewing and wine making are very clearly in there. Here's the link if you want to check it out. https://www.congress.gov/115/crpt/hrpt4 ... rpt466.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow Looks like they left us out entirely. There was an awful lot of paper shuffling going on, so it could have been slipped in there easily, but without someone to remind them (or push them) to add it at the last minute it just got left out...again. Without the lobbyist to shoe horn it into someone's additions nobody was going to just do us the favor.

I hope I'm wrong, but it seems like this was another missed opportunity. It just looked like chaos from the outside, so it is a complete surprise to me that they got the language from the Craft Beverage Modernization and Tax Reform Act added in the first place. Unless we get a miracle in the form of a late addition during the "fixes" they plan to make next year I think we're back at square one. I should stop posting when I'm depressed. Sorry guys.
"Never rub another man's rhubarb!" - Jack Napier
jb-texshine
Master of Distillation
Posts: 3036
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2015 12:03 am
Location: Texan living in Missouri

Re: H.R. 2903 is up to 83 co-sponsors...

Post by jb-texshine »

Wheres Rick or Tom at with a update.u
Remember not to blow yourself up,you only get to forget once!


Deo Vendice

Never eat Mexican food north or east of Dallas tx!
RaymieDubbs
Novice
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2017 11:19 am

Re: H.R. 2903 is up to 83 co-sponsors...

Post by RaymieDubbs »

So nothing in the bill about distilling specifically but is there a possibility TTB will be less funded? I was just on their website and they have a banner at the top specifically talking about the tax act. Less funding = less heat from the TTB?
User avatar
LWTCS
Site Mod
Posts: 12847
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:04 pm
Location: North Palm Beach

Re: H.R. 2903 is up to 83 co-sponsors...

Post by LWTCS »

RaymieDubbs wrote:So nothing in the bill about distilling specifically but is there a possibility TTB will be less funded? I was just on their website and they have a banner at the top specifically talking about the tax act. Less funding = less heat from the TTB?
Thats a plausible statement.
Trample the injured and hurdle the dead.
User avatar
Bushman
Admin
Posts: 18005
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 5:29 am
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: H.R. 2903 is up to 83 co-sponsors...

Post by Bushman »

Interesting thought!
User avatar
rgreen2002
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 1309
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 2:57 pm
Location: Northeastern USA

Re: H.R. 2903 is up to 83 co-sponsors...

Post by rgreen2002 »

RaymieDubbs wrote:So nothing in the bill about distilling specifically but is there a possibility TTB will be less funded? I was just on their website and they have a banner at the top specifically talking about the tax act. Less funding = less heat from the TTB?
Soooo our best chance at home distilling in peace is government apathy...? I'll take it! :mrgreen:
HD Glossary - Open this
A little spoon feeding *For New & Novice Distillers - start here
BEST WAY TO GET ANSWERS FROM HOME DISTILLER
"In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is."
Post Reply