triple distilling questions
Moderator: Site Moderator
-
- Novice
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 11:39 am
- Location: netherlands (limburg)
triple distilling questions
could any of the whiskey experts tell me what the effekt/reason off triple distilling is?
and how to do?
1e and 2e as usual, dillute to say 40% and go again?
collect normal?
thanks in advance....
and how to do?
1e and 2e as usual, dillute to say 40% and go again?
collect normal?
thanks in advance....
if you don't want to do time,
don't do a crime!
and as a finishing touch,
god created the dutch.
don't do a crime!
and as a finishing touch,
god created the dutch.
Im no expert but when I triple distille its to bring up proof.1st run I catch it all second Ill catch some foreshot and little of the heads but no tails.3rd run I make as carefull cuts as I can catching down to 80 proof.Every pass through the still lessens flavor.But when starting out with a low proof mash or wash Its not as much as you would think.Im sure others do it to get as high proof booze as they can .Irish whiskey is tripled distilled. From what Ive heard it has to be to be called irish wiskey.
I use a pot still.Sometimes with a thumper
-
- Trainee
- Posts: 787
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 8:38 am
- Location: great white north
Pretty much ditto on what Tater said. If I tripple distill a whiskey or a rum I take a litlle bit of foreshots only off the first 2 runs. The last run I will cut out the heads and tails. I think the you will make a better product with 3 distills simply because you do get out more of the low volitiles (stuff that comes off before 172°F- the vapour point of ethanol) But by the time you get to the third round there are very little of these low temp. volitles left. Like Tater said careful cuts are the key. The heads you can be generous with if your not sure, but on the tails end you wanna take enough to give you good flavor but not too much to give your spirit a (moonshiney) taste. My nose is my most trusted instrument for the tails cut. Rub a bit on your hands (make sure you rinse em with clean water first to get rid of any soap smell or anything else) Flap your hands around like a bird till it dries up and then smell your hands, if it has a nice whiskey/rum smell keep going, when your left with a skankey wet dog kinda smell make the cut.
This is how I go about making cuts... but I ain't no expert either.
This is how I go about making cuts... but I ain't no expert either.
Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he will sit in a boat all day and drink beer.
-
- Master of Distillation
- Posts: 3086
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 11:40 am
- Location: Texas
I do what UR described. Catch a little in my hand and rub it all around and smell. Makes it easy to discern different flavors.
Whether to dilute? Most of the time no. If you have electric elements then you may have to. If you do run a big batch of hi proof, be sure you have no leaks, be sure your condensor is up for the job, and don't walk away from your still. Things happen a lot faster.
Whether to dilute? Most of the time no. If you have electric elements then you may have to. If you do run a big batch of hi proof, be sure you have no leaks, be sure your condensor is up for the job, and don't walk away from your still. Things happen a lot faster.
-
- Novice
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 11:39 am
- Location: netherlands (limburg)
okay guys;
so i'm a small scaler i have to make some more batches to fill my boiler to go for triple distilling.
making a second (smaller) still is an option to.
it seems to me the best way to go for me is to collect in small jars and try U.R.s way of cutting afterwards.
i think when i do it during distilling i'm going to be to late to make the right cut.
my nose aint that good at it...stil learning.
before the third run, dillute down a bit?
i read on main site somewhere: dont cook high proof alc.
after second distill i normally have about 60-65 %abv.
would it be nesseceary to dillute?
i want to keep the roof in its place
i use propane for heating.
so i'm a small scaler i have to make some more batches to fill my boiler to go for triple distilling.
making a second (smaller) still is an option to.
it seems to me the best way to go for me is to collect in small jars and try U.R.s way of cutting afterwards.
i think when i do it during distilling i'm going to be to late to make the right cut.
my nose aint that good at it...stil learning.
before the third run, dillute down a bit?
i read on main site somewhere: dont cook high proof alc.
after second distill i normally have about 60-65 %abv.
would it be nesseceary to dillute?
i want to keep the roof in its place
i use propane for heating.
if you don't want to do time,
don't do a crime!
and as a finishing touch,
god created the dutch.
don't do a crime!
and as a finishing touch,
god created the dutch.
when making vodka (in a pot still), I actually think it is much better to cut the results of your 2nd distill with water. It helps to water down, and remove flavor.
However, for whisky's , the same thing will happen. You will water down, and wash out some of the flavor. I would only add water if you absolutely had to. I usually only double distill my flavored drinks (right at 65% ABV after all cuts have been done). However, I might try triple distilling on my next set (have 20 gallons of low wines right now to play with.)
For flavored drink, I think this is one reason why using gas vs using elec is key. Allows you to run without worry about boiling your element "dry" and burning it up.
H.
However, for whisky's , the same thing will happen. You will water down, and wash out some of the flavor. I would only add water if you absolutely had to. I usually only double distill my flavored drinks (right at 65% ABV after all cuts have been done). However, I might try triple distilling on my next set (have 20 gallons of low wines right now to play with.)
For flavored drink, I think this is one reason why using gas vs using elec is key. Allows you to run without worry about boiling your element "dry" and burning it up.
H.
Truth be told, I've always though triple distilliing is a way that commercial distillers "sexy" up the fact that they need to run more times in order to get a drinkable product. I don't make vodka -- I make whiskey (UJSM variations), brandies, and calvados.
That said, I have to admit I've never triple distilled, as I end up with, from first runs, 750 ml of fine stuff from my 4 liter runs (experimental recipes and such) and about 2.25 liters of fine 40 % from my copper alembic (20 liter boiler) 15 liter runs -- this is final, dilluted product. I'm almost always running a wash of about 12% (this is a number that I love, obviously because of my wine background). Only the calvados is made from a low alc. wash -- 5-6 percent.
When I collect enough heads and tails from the first runs, I distill a second time and end up with even more fine stuff (though I can't say which is better, the first or the second run). THe heads and tails from the second run go back into the carboy that I use to collect heads and tails from other second runs... (1 carboy for grain, 1 carboy for fruit, 1 carboy for calvados).
Thus, I'm never really doing a true third distillation. I figure, if I'm happy with the product I'm getting out of my first and second runs, why bother triple distilling?
I think that if you're careful with your cuts, you're going to get a fine product without having to triple distill.
However, this thread has gotten me thinking -- maybe I should try it....
Aidas
That said, I have to admit I've never triple distilled, as I end up with, from first runs, 750 ml of fine stuff from my 4 liter runs (experimental recipes and such) and about 2.25 liters of fine 40 % from my copper alembic (20 liter boiler) 15 liter runs -- this is final, dilluted product. I'm almost always running a wash of about 12% (this is a number that I love, obviously because of my wine background). Only the calvados is made from a low alc. wash -- 5-6 percent.
When I collect enough heads and tails from the first runs, I distill a second time and end up with even more fine stuff (though I can't say which is better, the first or the second run). THe heads and tails from the second run go back into the carboy that I use to collect heads and tails from other second runs... (1 carboy for grain, 1 carboy for fruit, 1 carboy for calvados).
Thus, I'm never really doing a true third distillation. I figure, if I'm happy with the product I'm getting out of my first and second runs, why bother triple distilling?
I think that if you're careful with your cuts, you're going to get a fine product without having to triple distill.
However, this thread has gotten me thinking -- maybe I should try it....
Aidas
First of all, use a hydrometer, so that you know when you ought to be starting the sniff test (like at about 60% abv for whiskey). Second of all, use two small collection jars, in addition to the main storage container. One collection jar could in fact be the hydrometer vessel, unless you're using a parrot's beak. Needless to say, nothing goes into the main bin until it has passed the sniff test. But before doing that, compare the two collection jars. Once the later one starts to smell raunchier than the earlier one, you're done. Comparing two samples is a lot easier than sniffing one sample and wondering whether or not you can detect marginal tails, based upon some memory of the aroma.="dutch@home". i think when i do it during distilling i'm going to be to late to make the right cut.
my nose aint that good at it...stil learning.
-
- Rumrunner
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 2:52 pm
- Location: Canada
muckanic
That is great advise. Tring to remember a previous smell is hard, at least for me. If you've got something to compare to it makes it a lot easier.Comparing two samples is a lot easier than sniffing one sample and wondering whether or not you can detect marginal tails, based upon some memory of the aroma.
... I say God bless you, I don't say bless you ... I am not the Lord, I can't do that ...
Dane Cook
Dane Cook
-
- Rumrunner
- Posts: 732
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:42 am
- Location: Nth coast NSW
-
- Novice
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 11:50 am
I'm with hornedrhodent take a lot of small bottles and smell each one, it will make it alot easier to tell when to make the cuts. When you identify the the tails, try and rub a little on your palm and smell, eventually you will be able to detect the tails coming over without having to use so many bottles.
alcohol kills brain cells......but only the weak ones!!!!
-
- Novice
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 5:02 am
Well over christmas I had too much time on my hands and about 6.5 gallons of about 150 proof stripping run liquor. I loaded up my keg with just tap water to know it down to 100 proof and fired up my high capacity column with copper mesh. It took me about two 4 hour runs but I got about 3 gallons of really good stuff. I kept the extremely generous heads and tails seperate to distill in my next stripped run.
But anyway back to my third distillation. I took the 3 gallons and knocked it down to 100 proof and over two 5 hour runs got some really clean stuff probably my best (yes I cleaned my copper between runs).
This stuff is wicked diluted to about 95 proof, almost odorless and EXTREMELY neutral almost no "flavor".
My doantion and or friend liquor I always run twice and filter but this 3 run stuff is my secret stash when no one is about.
But in summation this is a fun little project if you have enough time and a big enough still to make it worth you time.
Later,
Madscientist
But anyway back to my third distillation. I took the 3 gallons and knocked it down to 100 proof and over two 5 hour runs got some really clean stuff probably my best (yes I cleaned my copper between runs).
This stuff is wicked diluted to about 95 proof, almost odorless and EXTREMELY neutral almost no "flavor".
My doantion and or friend liquor I always run twice and filter but this 3 run stuff is my secret stash when no one is about.
But in summation this is a fun little project if you have enough time and a big enough still to make it worth you time.
Later,
Madscientist