Pot Still build in progress, need a little advise.
Moderator: Site Moderator
-
- Novice
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 10:19 am
Pot Still build in progress, need a little advise.
Well you guys convinced me to build a pot still so i can make some good whiskey and brandy. I went to the scrap yard and got all the NEW copper i need. total came out to $14 for (1) 2"x28", (2) 1"X26", (2) 1/2"X30". Not bad at all. I am building mine as close as i can to the one posted in this thread:
http://homedistiller.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3852
I have come up with 2 different plans:
1.
OR
2.
Questions:
1. Which looks like the better design?
2. Would you make any changes to either?
3. Is it really worth it to double the vapor pipe to 1" then reduce it to 1/2" for the water jacket?
thanks for all your input
-Moonshine Mike
http://homedistiller.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3852
I have come up with 2 different plans:
1.
OR
2.
Questions:
1. Which looks like the better design?
2. Would you make any changes to either?
3. Is it really worth it to double the vapor pipe to 1" then reduce it to 1/2" for the water jacket?
thanks for all your input
-Moonshine Mike
pot still
Both plans look ok to me,but ive built a few leibeg condencers,and I think
that one will be a water hog.I made mine with 3/4in inside 1in,then reduced it to 1/2 on the collection end. also leave the 2in reducer unsoldered so you can clean it better,and put a scrubber or two in there,depending on what your running.Use teflon tape at the unsoldered joint,and it wont leak vapor.
wineo
that one will be a water hog.I made mine with 3/4in inside 1in,then reduced it to 1/2 on the collection end. also leave the 2in reducer unsoldered so you can clean it better,and put a scrubber or two in there,depending on what your running.Use teflon tape at the unsoldered joint,and it wont leak vapor.
wineo
-
- Novice
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 10:19 am
Re: pot still
Good thinking Wineo, updated plan #2, which is the one im going to build unless anyone else has ideas on how to make it better.wineo wrote:Both plans look ok to me,but ive built a few leibeg condencers,and I think
that one will be a water hog.I made mine with 3/4in inside 1in,then reduced it to 1/2 on the collection end. also leave the 2in reducer unsoldered so you can clean it better,and put a scrubber or two in there,depending on what your running.Use teflon tape at the unsoldered joint,and it wont leak vapor.
wineo
-Moonshine Mike
Seems good for me too... Both condensers would work. I've a 2" column, 16" tall and it works pretty good. More than 16" would produce reflux... Mine gives first drips at 80%vol : enough, maybe too much!
I'm french speaking!
Boiler : 50 L (13 gal) beer keg, gas heated.
Reflux : 104 cm (41 inches) column 54 mm (2 inches) diameter withh SS scrubbers packing.
Potstill : 40 cm (15 inches) column 54 mm (2 inches) diameter without packing.
Boiler : 50 L (13 gal) beer keg, gas heated.
Reflux : 104 cm (41 inches) column 54 mm (2 inches) diameter withh SS scrubbers packing.
Potstill : 40 cm (15 inches) column 54 mm (2 inches) diameter without packing.
-
- Novice
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 10:19 am
lookin good
Looks very good.lots of cooling capicity.
wineo
wineo
Looks good....it really is amazing how simple it is to get started in this hobby. It might have been a bit more difficult in the pre-internet days.....I owe home distiller. org a lot.
It is most absurdly said, in popular language, of any man, that he is disguised in liquor; for, on the contrary, most men are disguised by sobriety. ~Thomas de Quincy, Confessions of an English Opium-Eater, 1856
-
- Bootlegger
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:04 am
What size are the various lines? It looks like you went from 2" to 1" and then reduced to either 3/4" or 1/2" as you went into the liebig, which has a 1" jacket, but I'm not sure. I like how you stuck the reducer into the tee at the top of the liebig - it looks real clean. How long is the condenser?
-
- Trainee
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 11:57 am
- Location: 1000 acre farm, Ohio
I'm sorry, did you say that the cold water comes in from the top? Most condenser designs have the cold inlet running in from the bottom of the condenser to induce a little thing called a counter current.MikeyT wrote:I turned my water inlet, outlet lines downward. Cold water goes in at the top. I'm using a 2 gpm Little Giant pump.
If I am misreading your post, disregard this entirely.
If two fluids (which may be defined as either liquid or gas) are separated by a semi permeable membrane, (in this case, copper) and they are flowing in opposite directions, the desired trait (in this case, heat) will transfer from the richer one to the poorer one more efficiently than if the fluids were flowing in the same direction.
What this means is that if the cold water is flowing upwards (from the inlet closest to the collection point) instead of down, you will use a lesser volume of water to cool the same amount of vapor, thereby making your condenser more efficient. This is incredibly valuable in stripping runs as you are forcing more vapor to condense in the same amount of time.
Making the water flow uphill may be a challenge if your circulation system is gravity powered. (Using a coolant reservoir above the condenser to create flow.)
However, since I see that you are using a pump, this should be no problem.
Aside from all that, very nice looking condenser.
"If you can't dazzle them with brilliance... baffle them with bullshit."
"Don't steal. The government hates competition."
"Believe none of what you hear, and only half of what you see"
20lt small pot still, working on keg
"Don't steal. The government hates competition."
"Believe none of what you hear, and only half of what you see"
20lt small pot still, working on keg
-
- Novice
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 10:19 am
Well, you made a believer out of me! I switched the hoses and tested the temps. The distillate is now running 3° cooler. Before it was 4° hotter than the water in the circulation tub. Now it's just 1° hotter. I don't think I quite understand the thermodynamics involved here, but the test definitely shows an improvement! Thanks!
Having 2 mash's fermenting, I'm distilling some water today.
Having 2 mash's fermenting, I'm distilling some water today.
Checked in one of my old thermodynamics books. The answer is average temperature differential. You want to have the maximum temperature differential you can get for as long as you can get it. Opposing flow will give you maximum average temperature differential. More temperature differential, more better.PUGIDOGS wrote:BW, This goes against all logical thinking but hey, if it works better that way I am going to run it up hill.
Pugi
I hadn't really given it much thought but it sure works!
-
- Master of Distillation
- Posts: 3086
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 11:40 am
- Location: Texas
-
- Trainee
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 11:57 am
- Location: 1000 acre farm, Ohio
I'm no perfesser in thermodynamics, but I read through my stillin' source books thoroughly. The Compleat Distiller mentions that liebig condensers are more efficient when the cooling water is run in the opposite direction of the vapor, but, unlike everything else, it does not mention why.
I wanted to find out, so I was trolling around on Wikerpedier one day, trying to look up something on the Stirling Cycle Engine, when I stumbled upon it.
Don't ya just love the internet?
An analogy can illustrate this point.
In jousting, it's easier for one knight to hit the other if they are running at each other. It's much harder if they are running in the same direction.
I wanted to find out, so I was trolling around on Wikerpedier one day, trying to look up something on the Stirling Cycle Engine, when I stumbled upon it.
Don't ya just love the internet?
An analogy can illustrate this point.
In jousting, it's easier for one knight to hit the other if they are running at each other. It's much harder if they are running in the same direction.
"If you can't dazzle them with brilliance... baffle them with bullshit."
"Don't steal. The government hates competition."
"Believe none of what you hear, and only half of what you see"
20lt small pot still, working on keg
"Don't steal. The government hates competition."
"Believe none of what you hear, and only half of what you see"
20lt small pot still, working on keg
-
- Angel's Share
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:47 pm
- Location: desert mountains of the west
and if you run it from bottom to top it'll push out the air bubble and entirely fill the water jacket. if you accidentally run it top to bottom the water can "fall out" without having to fill the void.
in a glass condensor it's easy to see and i've seen this happen dozens of times when i taught organic lab. if the condensor doesn't fill there's not going to be much heat transfer.
and like everyone said, you want the counterflow to maximize the gradient.
in a glass condensor it's easy to see and i've seen this happen dozens of times when i taught organic lab. if the condensor doesn't fill there's not going to be much heat transfer.
and like everyone said, you want the counterflow to maximize the gradient.
That's why I got to wondering about what direction it should flow. With the 1st way I had it hooked up, I was getting bubbles for the 1st 15 minutes. That got me wondering about heat transfer efficiency. Just never had taken the time to reverse the flow. Now, when I turn the pump on, it bubbles for a few seconds and that's it.schnell wrote:and if you run it from bottom to top it'll push out the air bubble and entirely fill the water jacket. if you accidentally run it top to bottom the water can "fall out" without having to fill the void.
in a glass condensor it's easy to see and i've seen this happen dozens of times when i taught organic lab. if the condensor doesn't fill there's not going to be much heat transfer.
and like everyone said, you want the counterflow to maximize the gradient.