What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Many like to post about a first successful ferment (or first all grain mash), or first still built/bought or first good run of the still. Tell us about all of these great times here.
Pics are VERY welcome, we drool over pretty copper 8)

Moderator: Site Moderator

BoomTown
Distiller
Posts: 1498
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 7:41 am
Location: Virgina

What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by BoomTown »

First, let me say thanks for being here. This looks like a great forum and I'm looking forward to learning from you all. I hope you be patient with me and my silly nubi questions.

We are about to run our first batch.

We'll be using a basic (8lbs) corn/(3/4lb)barley mash +23L H2O and a commercial packet of whiskey yeast. No sugar added. Our still has a refactoring column, but will but running unchecked through the beer run, with no packing. We'll run about 46L of beer mash, and then a separate run of the output.

We'll have no feints to add because this will be our first ever run. We're hoping to capture a traditional 'bourbon' flavor in the output from the 2nd run. But I have no knowledge of what actually contributes the flavor I'm looking for, is it the corn, the barley, or the yeast?

Are there any steps I can make to assure I'll have a whiskey that tastes like a whiskey when we are done? :eh:

Thanks in advance for any advise or input you offer.
“…Let’s do this one more time....”
User avatar
Odin
Master of Distillation
Posts: 6844
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:20 am
Location: Three feet below sea level

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by Odin »

Boom,

Did you read about makin' an all grain? Mashing, sparging, the lot?

If not, and you are making your first steps into home distilling ... maybe there are easier ways to start as compared to an all grainer?

Odin.
"Great art is created only through diligent and painstaking effort to perfect and polish oneself." by Buddhist filosofer Daisaku Ikeda.
mash rookie
Angel's Share
Angel's Share
Posts: 2228
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 8:20 am
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by mash rookie »

Good bourbon flavor is achieved using backset. Even if you are doing all grain and enjoying success converting I suggest reading the UJSSM recipe. It is a no cook sugar head recipe but is very helpful explaining the use of backset.



http://homedistiller.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=725
ProChargedHarley03
Bootlegger
Posts: 133
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 2:03 pm

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by ProChargedHarley03 »

Boom!!

Mash and Odin both have good points!!
I have done a number of UJSSM runs and it is a
Very easy none cook mash!!! I do use whiskey yeast
And I let it age on heavy charred white oak chips!!! It has a great
Flavor,a cross between knob creek with a hint of rum, I love
this stuff!!!! Now I have the Uncle Jessie's down, this summer
I will be moving up to the all grain bill!!! One last this boom, I was a
Big fan of Jack D, and wanted to make something just like it, after drinking a few
Bottles of aged uncle Jessie's and developing a taste for it, I don't even want
To drink Jack anymore!!!!! Until now we could only drink what we could buy,
That is how we develop a taste for whiskey, once you start drinking you're own
Stuff you will be all smiles!!! Good luck, have fun and be safe!!!
Last edited by ProChargedHarley03 on Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
HolyBear
Distiller
Posts: 1600
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 3:23 am
Location: Prolly diggin through Dnders posts

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by HolyBear »

Well, ... whiskey's one thing, Bourbon's anothern, still scotch is yet another... time is somethin that ingredients can't replicate......
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin
whiskeytripping
Swill Maker
Posts: 382
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 2:12 pm

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by whiskeytripping »

Boomtown have you made your vinegar run and sacrificial run yet? And unless we are missing a lot of information in between, you might need to read over the beginners forums more before starting your first run. Make sure you do your cleaning runs and sacrificial runs first. And if you haven't done that, do some more reading for beginners. Like I said, you might have already done this and there's just a lot of information in between you left out. Also, try the UJSSM recipe if this is your first. Because your first couple of batches you might not be impressed with (like me :mrgreen: ) going with a all grain is more difficult and a lot more work (and wasted materials if you mess it up).

There's a lot to learn here, the process of distilling is easy, but being safe and not hurting yourself is a different story. Welcome :thumbup:
MuleKicker
retired
Posts: 3111
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 2:14 pm
Location: If I told you, I'd have to Kill You.

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by MuleKicker »

I say welcome, welcome boomtown.... Pick a habit, we got plenty to go around... :thumbup:

Your not going to get a perfect bourbon on your first run. I have been doing this a while now, and I still cant say I am completely satisfied. Every run is different, and every run I learn something new. People can sit here and say, do this... dont do that.. .Until you truly experience it, you wont learn. :) Good luck, I like bourbon.
-Control Freak-
AKA MulekickerHDbrownNose
BoomTown
Distiller
Posts: 1498
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 7:41 am
Location: Virgina

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by BoomTown »

Thanks for all the comments and advice guys.

I've now made a couple of trial runs, one that included using an all grain mash, and one was a Uncle Jesse mash. Used Black Turbo Yeast. Mixed results, I'm using a copper pot, and have made a condenser by inserting 15" of 1/2 soft copper tubing into a 1" vinyl tube and circulating water from the bottom to the top. This seems to be working pretty efficiently. I set the copper pot into a larger kettle, fill the space between with water and heat it on a hotplate. Seems to take a while to start, runs pretty slowly, but it doesn't scorch or burn anything in the copper pot. I've made a little 8" x 1.5" head column, with 4 little copper plates spaced about 1.5 inches apart as an attempt at making a Refactoring Column, and the output is running at about 85% abv. with head temp at 180F. Oh yeah, no plastic between the pot and the collection jar, only copper, with a glass catch bottle. What I got out was pretty stout for drinking so I cut back to 80 proof using distilled water from the store, and put it into little 1 liter barrels. After 3 days, this tastes fairly good, but it's heavy on the corn flavor - not like the store bought bourbons I like. I'm hoping for a more traditional/commercial like flavor.

Still not achieved quite what I'm hoping for though.
“…Let’s do this one more time....”
User avatar
Odin
Master of Distillation
Posts: 6844
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:20 am
Location: Three feet below sea level

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by Odin »

When you are after a taste rich product like a bourbon or whisky or UJ, a fast fermenting Turbo may not be the best yeast to use ...

A slower, low ABV ferment will give more taste in general.

Odin.
"Great art is created only through diligent and painstaking effort to perfect and polish oneself." by Buddhist filosofer Daisaku Ikeda.
BoomTown
Distiller
Posts: 1498
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 7:41 am
Location: Virgina

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by BoomTown »

Odin,

Can you recommend a yeast package?
“…Let’s do this one more time....”
frozenthunderbolt
Distiller
Posts: 1417
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2011 3:01 am
Location: North island of New Zealand

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by frozenthunderbolt »

For a burbon you could try a good ale yeast, or even just use bakers yeast so long as you dont stress it by aiming for too higher initial ABV
Where has all the rum gone? . . .

Every new member should read this before doing anything else:
Usge
retired
Posts: 3243
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 8:22 am

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by Usge »

After the fact...you'll need to age/flavor it on burned/charred oak. That's what gives whiskey it's color and a lot of the character/taste. All whiskey comes out white (whitedog) and it doesn't taste like the finished product you are used to. That comes from aging it in charred oak barrels for many years. Part of learning is to learn what it needs to taste/smell like going in....so you get what you want coming out. It's not going to taste like "bourbon" off the still. If your whitedog cut is over 120 proof...water it down or use some single run mash to proof it down to around 120 proof. Get some charred or toasted oak cubes or sticks and age your bourbon in a glass jar..given it a shake and letting it air once in a while. It should turn darker within a couple days. Let it go a few weeks. Then, just keep aging as long as you can stand it :)
BoomTown
Distiller
Posts: 1498
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 7:41 am
Location: Virgina

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by BoomTown »

Boom here, still worried about my taste. Made some stuff last month, cut it back to 110, added some toasted oak chips, and set it outside on the 25th of last month. Just tasted it, and I'm not happy. It's very harsh.

The mash was 50% corn, 25% Rye, and 25% Barley....but it is seems very harsh to me now....

Any thoughts about how I can take the bite out of this? I'm tempted to re distill it, but not sure if that would solve my problem.

boom
“…Let’s do this one more time....”
Dnderhead
Angel's Share
Angel's Share
Posts: 13666
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 8:07 pm
Location: up north

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by Dnderhead »

""I'm not happy. It's very harsh.""
did you make cuts? the less you going to age the better cuts you will need.
Usge
retired
Posts: 3243
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 8:22 am

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by Usge »

gotta be careful with that heads cut...particularly if you are distilling at higher proof (higher separation). That tends to concentrate the nasties that make up heads/tails and makes them harder to blend in. Sometimes...you end up with stinging/chemical heads...then a couple of dry/astringent jars in the middle...then really nasty tails. It's hard to cut anything out of that and mix it together to make it work. Try proofing your still charge down with wash rather than watering it down after the fact. Start with 15-20% still charge...so that your distilled cut comes out at lower proofs rather than starting with 40-45% still charge ..collecting at higher proof avg and having to water it way down. If that doesn't work...try this....start with a pot full of mash/wash and run it low and slow. Collect in equal lots and line them up. You should notice that its much smoother right off the bat (because it's lower proof). Some people prefer it that way. (single run). Subjective and matter of personal taste.

Dnder double runs like that (ie, runs low wines like that— off at lower (drinking/aging) proof). But, you'd have to get him to explain how he does it. My lowwines always came out the same 30-35% regardless of what I started with. The only difference would be how much I got back...ie., if I started with 5% mash beer I'd get back about 1/2 gallon of 30-35%. If I started with 10%..I'd get back a gallon of 30-35%. I believe this was mainly due to the fact that my stove-top burner was limited as to it's power. I could only run the heat so hard. So my strip runs were what they were and always came out about the same. If I could have run them faster/harder with more heat ...I might have been able to vary that more. But, that would just be a guess on my part.

I did have a batch of rather harsh, astringent whiskey that I made...that I cleaned up by mixing/diluting it down with single run mash. That brought it around nicely, added a grain sweetness and fullness to it... and took away the harsh/astringent note. I would add...that you also need to give it some time to age/smooth out. However, if you find it doesn't change (ie., the harshness) and it just tastes like the same harshness oaked...you probably missed your heads cut. (or just had a bad run). It happens.
BoomTown
Distiller
Posts: 1498
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 7:41 am
Location: Virgina

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by BoomTown »

Thanks Usage,

I took the stuff that was harsh, and added it into the backwash of a batch I'd just run, shut the still off, and let it steep for 12 hours.

Then I ran it off into 300ml jars, until I got most of it back. I tossed the first 300ml as Feints, and kept the rest. The last 400ml started to have a little 'tails' type taste, but not very strong. The harshness is considerably lessened, and it has a much sweeter, more 'whisky' (scotch like) flavor, though a trifle sweet. I was aiming at a Bourbon like flavor, but at least now it's drinkable.

It ran out starting at about 140p, and ended at about 35 proof. After checking each little jar, I combined them all, and cut the whole volume back to 94 proof. Have set it into a 2L cask, and put that in a baggie to limit the angels share. Will check it again in 30 days, but expect it to be much better than the first go of it. Much improved.

Thank you. It's off to work I go, hi ho, hi ho, back to the mash room we go....BTW the batch that I made to create the backwash turned out just fine. Looks like I'll have a good supply to tap come election night!

Boom
“…Let’s do this one more time....”
BoomTown
Distiller
Posts: 1498
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 7:41 am
Location: Virgina

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by BoomTown »

Hi folks, want to say thanks for the past advise. It's been very helpful. So it is with some hesitation about making a pest of myself that I come looking for more advice.

I posted earlier about the sharpness of the tastes that I'd been getting, and that problem is now better understood, and resolved. In addition, I've bought a grain mill, and that has had big impact on the taste of output for me. Also, I've started using a clearing solution that contains Diatomaceous Earth and Alginate at the end of fermentation before I rack out the beer wash. The wash going into the still now is much cleaner, and the taste of the output of the run is 100% better. I attribute that to the disolved solids and suspended yeasts are not present as much, so not contributing background flavors. These things combined have taken away the 'bite' that I'd been getting.

But now the challenge is, how to amplify the potential of the mash. I'm now kibbling all the whole grains (RYE and Barley) to about the same grind as the cracked corn, I think that's resulting in better sugar conversion (though still can't clear the starch test with iodine like I read about.) I'm extending the cooking time (assuming there may be some affect of higher altitude that isn't quite brought up in the reading I've been doing).

Which brings us to this weeks challenge. I'm still getting an Original Gravity reading of 1030 range. I'm striving for an SG of 1065. So on my last batch, I finally added sugar to the mash to lift the OG for 1034 to 1065. I'd really like to get to 1065 with the grains alone. QUESTION: How is that possible?

Any help you offer is greatly appreciated.

Regards,

Boom
“…Let’s do this one more time....”
Usge
retired
Posts: 3243
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 8:22 am

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by Usge »

BoomTown wrote: Which brings us to this weeks challenge. I'm still getting an Original Gravity reading of 1030 range. I'm striving for an SG of 1065. So on my last batch, I finally added sugar to the mash to lift the OG for 1034 to 1065. I'd really like to get to 1065 with the grains alone. QUESTION: How is that possible?
Boom
Given your grain/water recipe is adequate and your yeast is healthy, It's possible through better efficiency in your mash process. There are so many variables..it usually takes some practice to get the most out of it. There are lots of suggestions, methods, advice on this subject in the mashing/fermentation forum. Personally I've found field corn a tough nut to crack. It usually absorbs a LOT of water if you try to soak it, and just cooking it straight through and mashing it doesn't usually get the full potential of starches out of it. So, some sort of pre-soaking method prior to cooking worked better but you have to adjust the water along the way. Dnder has lots of experience with this (as do some other members of the forum). Basically, you need to treat field corn like cooking dried beans. But, how much starch you get out of your grain, is going to determine how much is available to convert to sugars. So, this is one important aspect of the process....getting your grains properly gelantized.

Another aspect/variable would be the mashing temp range you use. If it's too thick (consistency)...it's not going to convert as well. So, sometimes...pre-malting makes sense. Different grains have different issues..ie., Rye tends to be very gelatinous and sometimes requires "gluten rests" at various temps to keep it from turning into to "snot". So, temp is another variable here that can make a difference.

My personal experience: There are many here with much more experience than I have mashing all sorts of grain...but my own personal experience having done a bit, is that I never was able to achieve over 1.040 or so using cracked corn. And I used several different corn sources just to be sure it wasn't the corn and several different methods. It was definitely "me". The best result I've gotten has been using flaked corn (pre-gelanitinized) and using a version of NChooch's NC Bourbon recipe. I documented my experiment here: http://homedistiller.org/forum/viewtopi ... =3&t=23475 I can consistently get back around 5.5 gals at 1.062-1.065 range with this method. (repeated many times). The drawback to the method is ...straining the wort off at the end is labor intensive and requires squeezing the bag. Only the first 1/2 of it will drain off..after that..you are left lifting and squeezing the bag until you get the rest. But, it's the best results I've personally been able to achieve.

rtalbigr who has lots of mashing experience has a detailed step-by-step no boil method here http://homedistiller.org/forum/viewtopi ... =3&t=24312 And of course we have our own resident Dnderpedia who has a lifetime of experience...probably forgot more than most of us will ever know. (just look up any of Dnder's posts on the subject). There are many others here who have successful mashing methods that work for them achieving the results you are looking for. But, if you ask most people...what changed that got them there.....it's mostly "practice". There are so many variables...it's hard enough to just get through the basic entire process. Once you get that down...you start refining it by studying up on different variables. As you refine the process...you'll figure out the things that you need to tune to get the most out of what you are doing.

But, I would also say...there is nothing wrong with a 1.030-1.040 range. Particularly for your first few times!! It will get better as your learn more, practice more. More importantly, it doesn't pay to get greedy here. The biggest chunk of problems we read about everyday...are people trying to push ferments too hard..which never results in good things. Quality over quantity. A 1.030 to 1.045 properly mashed is MUCH preferable to a higher SG that tastes like crap. Lower SG's will stress your yeast less, giving healthy good tasting ferments that will translate into good tasting whiskey. Higher OG grain bills...means more grain to water..and this is what complicates the mashing process as well.

Lastly, the purpose of the starch test with iodine is not to clear the liquid. (maybe I'm misreading what you wrote—"though still can't clear the starch test with iodine like I read about.". You have to "start" with a clear sample of liquid off the top of your mash. If you get "any" grains or matter in it...it will throw the test off and the iodine will read starch and turn dark. If your mash does not have a pool of clear liquid on the top at the end of your mashing process...then something else is wrong. You should be able to easily scoop a small spoon full of clear liquid from the top. Once you have that...just a tiny drop of iodine in it...will tell the tale. If it stays orange/red ...you are good! If it turns dark (black) then you still have starches. Now, if you still have starches from your mash process...you can leave it longer ...and see if it comes around. If it doesn't...then you've got other issues earlier in the process to look at as to why you aren't getting more full conversion of starches to sugars.

As I said before...I'm no expert. But, hopefully this will get you pointed in the right direction. There are plenty of members here who have a LOT of experience with getting the most out of mashing, etc. I would definitely move your queries over to the mashing/fermentation forum where you'll find plenty of reading, methods, and conversation on the topic. And keep practicing. :thumbup:
BoomTown
Distiller
Posts: 1498
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 7:41 am
Location: Virgina

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by BoomTown »

Thanks Usage, looks like it's back to the HD library....

Boom
“…Let’s do this one more time....”
fooznfool
Novice
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:56 pm

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by fooznfool »

Usge - THANKS!!! Great post. I was struggling with the same issue last night. I did an AG 5lb flake maze, 2lb two row. DIdnt think I was converting well. Kept failing the iodine test. I had liquid at the top of the mash but I would stir first then pull a small sample and then fail the test. When I tested the top liquid only (no stir) it passed. On to the fermenter!! Thanks again...amazing what you will find if you search and read. :clap:
Distilling is like good sex!! Slow, leaves you with that good feeling, and makes the neighbors wonder what the heck is going on that time of the morning!
Usge
retired
Posts: 3243
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 8:22 am

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by Usge »

Ur welcome! Yep...dont' stir it up before testing. Glad it worked out!
BoomTown
Distiller
Posts: 1498
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 7:41 am
Location: Virgina

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by BoomTown »

All,

Again, want to say thanks to all of you that share your advise and expertise.

My quest for the taste I'm looking fore has taken another giant step forward, and it has to do with the simplest thing. I think I made the mistake that many others new to this hobby have made, that of being too impatient. While pouring over the (get the pun?) postings in many layers of this site, I kept seeing references to letting the mash 'go dry' and probably still don't quite understand that, :| but also some people were careful to include that they had let the mash 'clear' for a couple of days. :roll:

I dropped back to punt, and ordered some "Sparkolloid Powder" from Hillbilly Stills several weeks back. And of course, I screwed up the first cycle of using it - didn't allow enough time for the 'clearing' activity to complete its cycle, and ran that batch after 24 hours (the label says 24-48 hours). The result was such an improvement in taste, that I decided to allow the full 48 hours on the next application. I was amazed at the difference in the appearance of the mash after the 48 hours. :esurprised: While it wasn't totally 'clear', it was obviously much cleaner than even the earlier cycle. And then I poured all into Lil Pauncho (that's what I call my still because by the time he's all wrapped up in his HotWater Heater blankets, and the $8 cotten blanket from Mexico, all he needs is a Sombrero and he looks like he's taking a siesta by the wall). The batch was about 20 L, and I was surprised at how much quicker Puncho's run started. Apparently, removing the suspended solids allowed the chemical separation to happen quicker (45 min vrs 65 min)- maybe because it is less dense as a mass? Or I had a higher ABV than last time?

But time-to-boil aside, the real improvement is in the taste of the hearts right out of Pauncho. The heads ran out quicker, and the tails started later, and the Hearts approached the 'back of the tongue liquorice' taste I'm hoping for. It isn't perfect yet, but it is the best I've gotten to so far. :thumbup: I consolidated the hearts (55% abv) to a 1/2 gal glass jug, added about 2 TBL spoons of Medium Toast French Oak Chips, and set the jug out on a corner of the porch. The color is coming on quickly, and while it's only about 48 hours old, it makes my mouth water every time I glance over there. I'm going to try to let it steep there until at least Thanksgiving, before I sample it, but I'm very encouraged. Will I end up with something that tastes like bourbon? :eh:

This is a very challenging hobby, and it sure seems a lot tougher to make Good stuff than my Uncle Columbus led me to believe back in the 50's. But thanks to you guys, much of that knowledge seems to be being preserved, and you make it available. Thanks again folks, and I'll touch this thread again after Thanksgiving to let you know how this actually turns out.
“…Let’s do this one more time....”
fooznfool
Novice
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:56 pm

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by fooznfool »

BoomTown wrote: I consolidated the hearts (55% abv) to a 1/2 gal glass jug, I'm going to try to let it steep there until at least Thanksgiving, before I sample it, but I'm very encouraged. Will I end up with something that tastes like bourbon? :eh:
Boom, I am MUCH newer to this than you and I am sure the folks with the knowledge will chime in. All I have read says that you could let it set there in the glass jug for ten years and it wont age a bit. Aging only happens in the proper oak barrels. It draw the liquid in then back out and traps the nasties sorta speak. I might be wrong, but thats the info I have read....thats why mine disappears so fast... :P
Distilling is like good sex!! Slow, leaves you with that good feeling, and makes the neighbors wonder what the heck is going on that time of the morning!
Dnderhead
Angel's Share
Angel's Share
Posts: 13666
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 8:07 pm
Location: up north

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by Dnderhead »

""Aging only happens in the proper oak "
thats only part,many chemical reactions happaning all at once,some alcohols are changing to other alcohols, some alcohols react with acids making esters,,many of these things can be done in a laboratory but there's is a problem its all mixed.if say you take butyric acid and have it react with methyl,,it will taste like apple.now in a lab setting the two whould be mixed heated? and a catalyst added then the reaction whould be almost immediate.if all was separate it work but its a mix..so it dont work that way.
BoomTown
Distiller
Posts: 1498
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 7:41 am
Location: Virgina

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by BoomTown »

Hello all,

Sorry to keep pestering you 'ol timers' but :? ....I've moved the goal posts fover here. Maybe setting the bar a little higher? I've been striving to make a bourbon, and I believe I've made some significant progress....at least I've a couple of gallons of some pretty aceptable drinking stuff...(of course I'm talking about putting it into my VW, of course I am....) but....it aint quite there yet.

I've been a Blanton's fan (when I buy a bottle for just ME) and Maker's Mark fan when I'm buy across the bar for years. What's been missing from my own stuff so far is that faint 'liquorish' back taste that emerges after you swollow. OK, I know - I've still got most of it on Oak, and it hasn't been that long, so there is plenty of time for it to oak/age and it Might get there but, -- Now I'm thinking :!: about what some of the OTs are calling this 'vanella' taste, though I think of itas more liqurish.

At any rate, just came back from the package store, where I guess I finally got round to reading the fine print on my Blanton's bottle and discovered a mention of the use of wheat. Gets me to thinking, what will I come up with if I modify my recipe (have been using 2 parts Corn, 1 part Barley, 1 part Rye) to something like :wtf: 2 parts Corn, 1 wheat, and 1 part Rye? Keep in mind too that my goal is to avoid using sugar if I can get a high enough ABV in an AG mash.

Has anyone tinkered with that grain bill as a AG mash before? If so who, I'll search out his posts. Also, I'm locked in on this now, so where could I buy some malted wheat berries?

Boom
“…Let’s do this one more time....”
frozenthunderbolt
Distiller
Posts: 1417
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2011 3:01 am
Location: North island of New Zealand

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by frozenthunderbolt »

I'de think something like 1.5 corn 2 6row barley malt .5rye and 1 Wheat. You gunna need the larger ammount of good barley to get conversion i wudda thought, less perhaps if you also malted your wheat.
Where has all the rum gone? . . .

Every new member should read this before doing anything else:
mash rookie
Angel's Share
Angel's Share
Posts: 2228
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 8:20 am
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by mash rookie »

Wheat and rye are commonly used in grain bills. Most Canadian whiskeys have a heavy blend of rye. I am not a big wheat fan but many like it. It is why I don't make sweet feed. I could pick it out on a distillery tour sample at Woodinville Whiskey Co. Although it is made in Washington they call their whiskey “Bourbon”

http://www.woodinvillewhiskeyco.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
BoomTown
Distiller
Posts: 1498
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 7:41 am
Location: Virgina

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by BoomTown »

Well here you go. :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Over the past 5 months, we've run this same bill of grains about a dozen times. Processing variables have been the way we packed the still head, sometimes opting to run without packing (resulted in ABV of about 40% most of the time) and then an assortment of still packing approaches based on adding rubble copper in various ways. The last run, we had 7 horizontal plates fitted to allow the H2O to drain back down the column after being filtered through some copper mesh, with the horizontal plates spaced about 2" apart, allowing a 1/2 piece of copper venting the gasses from the horizonatal plate below up and into the next champers at about 1.25" against a solid cap that forced the vapors down through the copper mesh to about 3/4" before it could continue to rise. Output of Fients ran out at 175p ABV but dropped off to 165p ABV when it started running the hearts. The hearts ran out to about 60p ABV, yielding 2.75 qts before the tails tastes began to appear. I kept the output in separate jars till the tails were running strongly, at about 35% ABV, they still taste pretty good. After 35%, I let the still run till the output volume dropped off, and shut Lil Pauncho down. ABV of the tails is about 40p.

All in all, I'm very pleased with what I've learned during this series of cycles using the 50/25/25 + 1.5lbs of malted barley, Red Star yiest, and 5gal batches. I've often added sugar to raise to OG of the mash to 1065 after the mash conversion stage, before I toss the yeast. I've even grown to like the taste of the 'white dog' to the point that I am right now sipping a couple of ounces over ice. Looking at what's left of the output, I've a couple of 1/2 gal jugs, and 5 little 1 L oak barrels, and a few 750ml bottles that I've collected from the past 3 months work. I plan to wait 90 days from now to check the oaked output.

I'm feel like I'm ready now to move forward to an AG with the goals of achieving 10% ABV in the mash, without using sugar.

You guys have been great coaches, and I'm looking forward to the new challenges.

Thanks for your interest. :D :D

Boom.
“…Let’s do this one more time....”
BoomTown
Distiller
Posts: 1498
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 7:41 am
Location: Virgina

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by BoomTown »

OK guys, I'm back....!

Let's bore down on this taste thing, please. I've been tinkering with all this now for well over a year, and have decided to rephrase the question.

I'm getting predictable result coming back from my little 3 gallon oak barrels, but not satisfactory results.

The liquor seems to me to have a 'hot' palate...and I've been led to believe that has something to do with having added sugar, and not having had it have enough time on Oak.
Originally, I attributed this to using an aluminum pot ( OK OK, I adjusted..) now using a SS pot, and much more well understood head, and aging process.

But I'm still tripping over this 'hot' impact, rather than a predicable 'smooth' mouth...

Any observations you may offer will be welcome.

Boom
“…Let’s do this one more time....”
Usge
retired
Posts: 3243
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 8:22 am

Re: What about the 'flavor' or 'taste' I'm looking for?

Post by Usge »

Boomer, hard to say. Could be a lot of things. I've experienced the same thing myself from time-to-time...so you aren't alone. Try to approach it methodically...changing only one thing at a time till you discover the culprit.

Some things to check:

Obviously your cuts would be the first thing to play with. Don't cut right off the still. If you are single running your cuts may be in a different place depending upon how much reflux you are using. And any given recipe may taste better through a certain proof range than not. So, you have to experiment a bit on each one till you find the sweet spot for what you like. Some people luck into it first few tries and quickly get things dialed in. Others, including myself, spend a lot more time before getting there.

Fermentation issues would have to be number 1 place to check. Because this is where you actually "create" your alc. Alteration of temps and/or process or anything that can stress yeast can cause it to go sideways. Sometimes it's really noticeable (like bad smell, or a funk growing in it). But, sometimes it's not. It looks ok, smells ok, but has produced some by-products that just states aweful or burn like the dickens when you distill it up. For burning/stinging in the mouth, ethyl acetate is probably a good candidate. It has a boiling point very close to ethanol, and as a result is hard to separate cleanly. If you get a ferment that produces an abundance of it for some reason...your stuff gonna burn and stang and no amount of distilling will get rid of it entirely. I would shoot for a target range of around 6-8%.

If you recycle feints (including heads) they can sometimes cause some burning/prickly nastiness. If you are gonna recycle something, recycle the tails. But, I usually don't cycle them more than once. The key here is if you notice a difference between your sweet/clean runs (ie., without feints added) and your runs where you add them. If you sort your ferment and believe the problem lies elsewhere...you might try changing up your method a bit to see if you can uncover some clues. If you are single running and jacking the proof, try letting it out and double running it (water it down to around 30% for the 2nd run if it's not already). Try varying the proof of your still charge. Try varying how fast or slow you run it. Sometimes you'll find a particular recipe likes to start out maybe a bit lower in proof through the whole range. That can smooth things out sometimes. So, your cut, and the flavors that form it, will sort of hit different proof ranges...can sometimes smooth out some rough spots that come up when you push some parts of the run too high proof. Otherwise, you got to go all the way up to clean it out. And if you notice...sometimes, depending on recipe/ferment..even if you drop the proof a few points from as high as you can get it...you start to get more burn/offflavors, etc. than you otherwise would get from just the ethanol. So, this is where your ferment is important (ie., what's in it).

You might try backing off the reflux a bit and running it off so that it comes off in a bit lower proof range till you find the proofs that hit the right notes through your recipe. Then remember it. And aim for the next time. Once you can get some sort of repeatable results...make some further adjustments/tweaking. Dnder used to tell me...if you aren't sure which way to go.....go big in either direction. See what happens. Then go big in the other direction...and see the result. This is the only way to know where each direction is "headed". Then you might have a better understanding of which way to tweak when you are looking for something particular.

Hope those ramblings make some sense.
Post Reply