Small Batch Proofing

Other discussions for folks new to the wonderful craft of home distilling.

Moderator: Site Moderator

WestCoast
Novice
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2014 4:02 pm

Re: Small Batch Proofing

Post by WestCoast »

Prairiepiss wrote:
1) Is there as minimum batch size for an alcoholmeter to be effective, or am i making a false assumption?
As ling as you can get enough to fill your test cylinder. So your hydrometer will float.
If you can't float a hydrometer. You need to make a bigger batch. Because you wouldn't be able to make good cuts. If your not getting enough to test with a hydrometer.

A parrot on a 3 gallon boka would be worthless. Assuming its giving you 90%+ ABV.
2 gal at 10% would be around 1.6 pints of 100% ABV. So around 1.8 pints of product.just enough for a part to smear the crap out of. No mater what size it was.

Truthfully I would be working more about increasing the boiler and batch sizes. The trying to figure out how to test the small amount you get now.

While i would like to go bigger, space and $$ have me restricted to my current size. I am hoping that running a "parakeet" in line will help give me some idea of whats going on with minimal smearing.

-WC-
WestCoast
Novice
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2014 4:02 pm

Re: Small Batch Proofing

Post by WestCoast »

Prairiepiss wrote:
A parrot on a 3 gallon boka would be worthless. Assuming its giving you 90%+ ABV.
2 gal at 10% would be around 1.6 pints of 100% ABV. So around 1.8 pints of product.just enough for a part to smear the crap out of. No mater what size it was.
I made a run this week, and have to agree with your assessment. I started with 5 gallons at 8%, worked that down to 3/4 gallon at 25%, and then ended up with 1 cup of final drinkable product at 80%. That said, i think i still managed to smear my cuts and ended up with some off flavors. So i think to run anything off the boka, i will need to start doubling or even tripling up my batches (2+ gallons of low wines), just to smooth out my cuts. I am going to have to figure out a more cost affective way to make a vodka. All that said, if i tune down the boka for a rum or whiskey then a parrot could be very useful.

-WC-
Hound Dog
Master of Distillation
Posts: 3002
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2013 4:45 pm
Location: Hounds Hollow, VA

Re: Small Batch Proofing

Post by Hound Dog »

bigger boiler.... :shh:
LM Still Operating Instructions
Cranky's New Distiller's Advice
Using Google Search

Drinking Rum before noon makes you a Pirate not an alcoholic.
User avatar
T-Pee
Master of Distillation
Posts: 4355
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:20 pm
Location: The wilds of rural California

Re: Small Batch Proofing

Post by T-Pee »

Hound Dog wrote:bigger boiler.... :shh:
:esurprised:

tp
WestCoast
Novice
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2014 4:02 pm

Re: Small Batch Proofing

Post by WestCoast »

T-Pee wrote:
Hound Dog wrote:bigger boiler.... :shh:
:esurprised:
tp
OUCH! I got burned.

-WC-

(corrected for improper use of quoting)
Last edited by WestCoast on Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
T-Pee
Master of Distillation
Posts: 4355
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:20 pm
Location: The wilds of rural California

Re: Small Batch Proofing

Post by T-Pee »

WestCoast wrote:
T-Pee wrote:
Hound Dog wrote:bigger boiler.... :shh:
:esurprised:
OUCH! I got burned.
tp
If you're gonna quote me, quote me accurately, k? :problem:

tp
WestCoast
Novice
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2014 4:02 pm

Re: Small Batch Proofing

Post by WestCoast »

Weird, not really sure how that happened.

Sorry, no offense was meant.

-WC-


Figured out what i did wrong. Wrote inside of the quoted HTML code. My bad. Live and learn.
User avatar
T-Pee
Master of Distillation
Posts: 4355
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:20 pm
Location: The wilds of rural California

Re: Small Batch Proofing

Post by T-Pee »

No worries. I'm not into hunting people down for an html mistake. :wink:

tp
User avatar
BigSwede
Rumrunner
Posts: 674
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 10:36 am

Re: Small Batch Proofing

Post by BigSwede »

From another thread...
NZChris wrote:You thought wrong. Try putting some samples of your spirits on your refractometer and you'll see what I mean. You could make a conversion chart, but I would guess the alcohol would eventually wreck the cover. They might be cheap to replace now, I've never checked.
NZChris, have you made any progress on your Laser Parrot?

I read the site you linked... fascinating stuff. I couldn't resist and ordered 3 acrylic hollow prisms off the internet. They were dirt cheap at $3 each. There are also hollow glass prisms available for about $10 U.S.

I'm going to mess with this a bit as well. The concept is cool as hell. Distillate drains into prism, overflows into collection, and all the while the laser angle lets you know the proof while refracting onto a white backing board or similar.
User avatar
Jimbo
retired
Posts: 8423
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:19 pm
Location: Down the road a piece.

Re: Small Batch Proofing

Post by Jimbo »

Swede,

Acrylic 'crazes' with contact to ethanol. It will fill with tons of little cracks and become very brittle then shatter in your hand with very little pressure. Shoulda sprung for a glass one.
In theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice there is.
My Bourbon and Single Malt recipes. Apple Stuff and Electric Conversion
User avatar
BigSwede
Rumrunner
Posts: 674
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 10:36 am

Re: Small Batch Proofing

Post by BigSwede »

Jimbo wrote:Swede,

Acrylic 'crazes' with contact to ethanol. It will fill with tons of little cracks and become very brittle then shatter in your hand with very little pressure. Shoulda sprung for a glass one.
Darn... thanks for the head's up. I'm only out a few $$.

I do have a couple lasers and a bottle of commercial 95 proof ethanol. Maybe I can at least verify that a rig can be set up and yes indeed we get refraction obvious enough to track with a white wall chart or similar.
heartcut
Master of Distillation
Posts: 2781
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 9:31 am
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: Small Batch Proofing

Post by heartcut »

Swede, did you find a hollow glass prism that was just glass, or maybe bound with teflon? I looked and only found hollow glass prisms that were a bunch of flat pieces bound together with plastic- probably not ethanol friendly. This is a cool idea.
heartcut

We are all here on earth to help others; what on earth the others are here for I don't know.

W. H. Auden
User avatar
NZChris
Master of Distillation
Posts: 13732
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2013 2:42 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: Small Batch Proofing

Post by NZChris »

Acrylic is ok for proving to yourself that the concept works, but I wouldn't go building a laser parrot out of it.

I know the concept works and how it works, and that a home brewed version is feasible, but I don't need one and even if I did have one, I would still be relying on my nose, tongue and fingers at any critical points if doing cuts on the fly.
User avatar
BigSwede
Rumrunner
Posts: 674
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 10:36 am

Re: Small Batch Proofing

Post by BigSwede »

heartcut wrote:Swede, did you find a hollow glass prism that was just glass, or maybe bound with teflon? I looked and only found hollow glass prisms that were a bunch of flat pieces bound together with plastic- probably not ethanol friendly. This is a cool idea.
A Google search of "hollow glass prism" reveals just ONE type of prism that is put together somewhere, probably in Asia, for use in science classes and the like. It's not expensive, looks kind of clunky, and is probably just three glass plates glued together with optical cement - just guessing there - and doesn't look to be something a guy could use for production. But for experimenting, proof of concept, yes.

There MUST be something decent out there, but I couldn't find it.

Does it have to be a prism shape? We're not looking to make a pretty rainbow, just trying to bend a beam of light. Refraction takes place at the junction between air and a liquid, like the classic "pencil in a glass of water" trick. Maybe it would work with a nice optically clean rectangular vessel if you hit it with the laser at a correct angle.

NZChris - understand completely what you are saying, but I'm a bit of a geek with science, and this sort of thing is just for fun.
heartcut
Master of Distillation
Posts: 2781
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 9:31 am
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: Small Batch Proofing

Post by heartcut »

Perfume bottles might just come in a shape with approximately 90 degrees between two faces, and the high dollar ones tend to be optically clean just for looks.
heartcut

We are all here on earth to help others; what on earth the others are here for I don't know.

W. H. Auden
User avatar
BigSwede
Rumrunner
Posts: 674
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 10:36 am

Re: Small Batch Proofing

Post by BigSwede »

heartcut wrote:Perfume bottles might just come in a shape with approximately 90 degrees between two faces, and the high dollar ones tend to be optically clean just for looks.
Time to raid the Wife's side of the bathroom!

If she doesn't have one, I can shop for one and simply claim "birthday gift." :wink:

One thing I'm dying to try - I have a lapping machine that is used to sharpen carbide tooling. It uses diamond laps to cut, and some of the wheels are fine enough to turn a piece of steel into a mirror. Should be able to grind glass with ease. The trick is going to be taking it beyond experimental/prototype, and turning it into something more than an experimental gadget.
User avatar
Jimbo
retired
Posts: 8423
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:19 pm
Location: Down the road a piece.

Re: Small Batch Proofing

Post by Jimbo »

Get her some nice perfume for xmas, when she asks why her Chanel #5 came in an old plastic medicine bottle tell her ..... I dunno what to tell her,.... youll have to come up with something good here.
In theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice there is.
My Bourbon and Single Malt recipes. Apple Stuff and Electric Conversion
User avatar
NZChris
Master of Distillation
Posts: 13732
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2013 2:42 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: Small Batch Proofing

Post by NZChris »

The laser only has to pass through two faces. If the third side was copper, it could incorporate the mounts and collector funnel.

The parrot could leak a bit. It only has to maintain a level above the laser.

I could knock something up using sheet glass and the copper foil in my stained glass toolbox.
User avatar
BigSwede
Rumrunner
Posts: 674
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 10:36 am

Re: Small Batch Proofing

Post by BigSwede »

Acrylic prisms came in. With chemist daughter attending, we did some simple experiments.

The laser was fixed in a vise, and the prism was also fixed. Laser on, we marked the dot on the wall which was roughly four feet away. Next, filled it with water. Laser on, wow! The dot moved a good 18" on the wall, a huge jump and more than I expected.

Water out, 95% ABW in. Laser on. Hmm, yes the target dot moved, but only by about 1/2 inch from the water dot. So H2O to 95% EtOH caused movement, but only slight.

We need some way to "amplify" the dot movement. Either the target needs to be 30 feet away (not practical) or somehow with optics or mirrors, the slight displacement must become more visible on a printed chart or graph. Not knowing jack about optics, I'm shelving this for now, but I can confirm that yes it's definitely possible.

I just like the thought of glancing at a wall chart and seeing a bright laser spot moving crisply across a graph of 0% to 95% EtOH. I think it'd be cool.
LBHD
Bootlegger
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 1:52 pm

Re: Small Batch Proofing

Post by LBHD »

The depth of the liquid could also affect the distance the beam is refracted- could get a bigger prism? Although it still wont move too much as water and alcohol are very similar density --

Air is something like 1.25 kg/m3, water is 1000 kg/m3, ethanol is ~800 kg/m3.

So the 18" jump is for a 800:1 ratio of density. The ethanol/water ratio is only 8:10.

I like the idea of mirrors making your target farther, but i would worry about shooting my eye out!

edit:

Also, the angle of entry can make a big difference too - try and maximize the amount of liquid your beam is going through?
Last edited by LBHD on Mon May 12, 2014 6:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Jimbo
retired
Posts: 8423
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:19 pm
Location: Down the road a piece.

Re: Small Batch Proofing

Post by Jimbo »

BigSwede wrote:
I just like the thought of glancing at a wall chart and seeing a bright laser spot moving crisply across a graph of 0% to 95% EtOH. I think it'd be cool.
Hell yes, that'd be very cool. Line up all 3 prisms side by side, so the laser has to travel through them all?
In theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice there is.
My Bourbon and Single Malt recipes. Apple Stuff and Electric Conversion
User avatar
BigSwede
Rumrunner
Posts: 674
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 10:36 am

Re: Small Batch Proofing

Post by BigSwede »

We tried more experiments yesterday. My statement of only 1/2" movement was incorrect. With some fiddling, we got a good 10" movement between water and ethanol with a target 6 feet away. I unleashed my daughter and let her mess with it in detail. She mixed up a number of samples, varying alcohol, and we tried them all.

What we found was apparently non-linear. The spots on the wall looked like this, where

A = pure ethanol
B = 75%
C = 50%
D = 25%
E = pure water

A-----------------B--------C----D--E

Which is actually good because the area of interest (A to B) is expanded.

But... repeatability was difficult, results not consistent, and I'd chalk it up completely to cheap crappy plastic prisms and a poor setup in terms of rigidity. And the target was 6 feet away.

I think it'd work fine with a non-prism shape. The critical thing is the laser has to hit at a certain angle, and outside of that, it doesn't work well.

Jimbo - we tried it, and it has huge potential, each prism is like a transistor, boosting the initial output. Got to make a better setup.

LBHD - I'm not sure the amount of liquid the beam travels through changes the angle. The shift happens at the point where the laser enters the container.

More to come, but we really need to find an optical glass container of accuracy. These plastic prisms suck.
User avatar
Jimbo
retired
Posts: 8423
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:19 pm
Location: Down the road a piece.

Re: Small Batch Proofing

Post by Jimbo »

haha cool. did they start developing cracks and getting brittle yet?
In theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice there is.
My Bourbon and Single Malt recipes. Apple Stuff and Electric Conversion
User avatar
BigSwede
Rumrunner
Posts: 674
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 10:36 am

Re: Small Batch Proofing

Post by BigSwede »

Not yet... but the ethanol is cool. I'm sure hotter ethanol would hose them big time. Plus, acrylic in a real still would violate the "no plastics" rule in a big way.

Oh yes, forgot to mention, fores would probably melt them into a puddle! Acetone-like solvents and acrylic, NOT good! :ebiggrin:
Last edited by BigSwede on Tue May 13, 2014 11:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Jimbo
retired
Posts: 8423
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:19 pm
Location: Down the road a piece.

Re: Small Batch Proofing

Post by Jimbo »

I used a piece of acrylic racking cane as a wine thief a few times to pull samples of 62% whiskey out of a barrel. The plastic tube developed these weird cracks (crazing) and then shattered into several pieces when I set it softly on the table once. Ive since bought a glass wine (whiskey) thief. :mrgreen:
In theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice there is.
My Bourbon and Single Malt recipes. Apple Stuff and Electric Conversion
Post Reply