what fashion?mash rookie wrote:NcHooch wrote:MR, I think you're over-estimating the amount, and/or movement of water on the bottom plate.mash rookie wrote:
NC The down comer is needed on the bottom plate to allow water to return to the boiler. The trap is necessary to keep raw vapor from bypassing the plate. Flutes do a great job of removing water. Although there is not enough plates typically to allow a complete equilibrium where fractions find there sweet spot the down comer system does allow water to work its way back down when refluxing.
If what you're saying is correct, or necessary , then a 3 plate flute with no downcomer on the bottom plate wouldn't produce 90% from fores to tails
Just stating NC that is the purpose of the design. I may be over estimating the amount of water in raw vapor. Have you run your still in this fashion? Without severe flooding? Refluxed enough you could probably make 90% with two plates. Running without a down comer I think would slow you down. Please share what you learned. We have found that flutes are quite affective at separating alcohol from water and produce 90% relatively easy but not separate fractions. 3,4,5 plates probably tastes the same with similar smearing. My guess is slight difference in speed. Maybe not though. Speed is pretty much determined by diameter.
I typically run a 3" flute by getting it up to temp , and stacking the plates with full reflux ...I always need to reduce power by about 50% during that time.
once I've bubbled (all) the plates for 20 minutes I start reducing the coolant to the dephlag....slowly. I try and take the first 250 ml out slowly .
then I'll keep gradually reducing the cooling to the dephlag until I get a rapid drip (just shy of a stream) and then leave it there the entire run (sometimes adding more heat as the wash gets weaker). Eventually the bottom plate(s) will get depleted and the proof will start dropping ... at that point you're pretty much finished and then I just collect the tails and shut it down .
My 4-plate flute has a downcomer on the bottom plate (with a trap) .
The two 3-plate bugles I made had no downcomer on the bottom plate.
All three seem to work the same .... There's no smearing, no flooding, and I can tell quite easily while running when the cuts start and stop. Don't get me wrong tho, I'm not making a neutral, I tend to think you'd need 6 of more plates for a reasonable neutral.
Anyway, that's why I question the downcomer on the bottom. I'd be surprised if the liquid being returned to the boiler by the bottom downcomer wasn't 100 proof. ...And if that's the case , wouldn't you rather slowly drive that alcohol up the column through the other plates?, versus letting it drain back into the boiler and constantly recirculating? My final thought, I think there's always going to be some liquid returned to the boiler either through the perforations, or between the plates and the column (wall)...if you're running it so hard that there isn't a small amount running back down, it's likely that a downcomer would be defeated by the pressure difference , and won't work anyway.
thoughts?