But sshhhht it's a secret

Moderator: Site Moderator
Yup, I remember that one as well. The solder had not properly flowed between the flange and the pipe. And I have seen your posts and your jig, viewed many of your builds for tips! There are a few here, you one of them, that explains things so clearly.cranky wrote:I'm a cheap bastard and refuse to buy ferrules (or much of anything) which is why I have tried so many different methods. I don't want to discourage you from making your own. I use every type I have made although I have had a few failures which is why I mention it. I would support the column anyway because somebody, I forget who, had a failure of the SS to copper ferrule connection and their column fell over. Annealing and hammering a flange was actually quite easy once I made a sort of jig out of plywood for doing it. If you look at my goofy things thread on page 11 you can see what I did.moosemilk wrote:Maybe i'll just purchase some ferrules in that case. The stainless ones are not too pricey and will probably look great with the copper pipe. Thank you also!cranky wrote: I can say, I have used just about every method I can think of to make flanges. I have used wire, soldered a plate on, cut slits to make forming a flange with pliers easy and a proper hammered flange. I find that not forming a one piece flange can work but is weak and will fail if too much of a side load is put on it. I support mine from an eye bolt in the ceiling so it isn't a big issue but a proper hammered flange is by far the strongest and has less chance of leaking and failure.
I don't always succeed but I certainly trymoosemilk wrote:There are a few here, you one of them, that explains things so clearly.
Why would you make it bigger than needed to be? It's just a trap to keep vapor from going up the downcomer, hence it has to go through the fluid bed of your choosing. I am majorly in favor of the large inline thumper under the column to hold all of the liberated alcohol.raketemensch wrote:What's the current theory on the j-trap?
From what I understand, it's basically the heaviest, most-water-bearing stuff that end up in it.
So why not make it larger? I'm making mine with some 1" tube over 3/4" tube, and I can make it as deep as I'd like. Once I realized that, I started thinking... Why don't people make them huge, to trap as much of the least-wanted elements as possible?
You mean like these:raketemensch wrote:I'd like to use something heavier duty, and I'd *really* like to find some quick disconnects.
I'm confused about what you mean here, i.e. - "close up the dephleg"...I thought that was your CM reflux condenser, and typically they are always open to the vapor path. The defleg is "in-line" with the vapor path, right?raketemensch wrote:1) ...
2) ...
3) ...
4) Close up the dephleg and reflux for another 5-10 minutes
5) Open up the dephleg a little and start collecting into 300ml jars
6) ...
Yeah, that bit is confusing, I'll go edit it for posterity.still_stirrin wrote:I'm confused about what you mean here, i.e. - "close up the dephleg"...I thought that was your CM reflux condenser, and typically they are always open to the vapor path. The defleg is "in-line" with the vapor path, right?raketemensch wrote:1) ...
2) ...
3) ...
4) Close up the dephleg and reflux for another 5-10 minutes
5) Open up the dephleg a little and start collecting into 300ml jars
6) ...
Same thing when you say, "open up the dephleg". Are you, or are you not simply regulating the water flow into/out of the condenser to regulate the reflux ratio?
Can you explain a little better what your are doing? What....are you closing and opening? Surely, you don't have a valve in the vapor path do you?
ss