I don't think that bit was addressed at you either. At any rate, keep trying to post and see what happensARK ANGEL wrote: I will gladly comply with the read only status, see you in 30 days everyone, and many thanks.
Peter.
![Smile :-)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Moderator: Site Moderator
I don't think that bit was addressed at you either. At any rate, keep trying to post and see what happensARK ANGEL wrote: I will gladly comply with the read only status, see you in 30 days everyone, and many thanks.
Peter.
Yep, on those too, had no idea they affected cognition.NZChris wrote:That describes me and some of my friends when taking a lot of statins, well, any amount really, it's just the degree that differs.ARK ANGEL wrote:I do have a cognitive reading disorder, usually repetitive re reading fills the blanks but not always, I classically miss things that are obvious, ....
Point taken.thecroweater wrote:This is a big world wide forum with great diversiity . For that reason it pays to read things from all angles before taking offence when possibly none is inferred, we all have many varied ways of communicating. Going off half arsed can escalate a problem that was not there to start with.
Yep, I see what you mean, I was just expecting at least something like that for going a bit overboard, but, I'd cop it sweet regardless.Mikey-moo wrote:I don't think that bit was addressed at you either. At any rate, keep trying to post and see what happensARK ANGEL wrote: I will gladly comply with the read only status, see you in 30 days everyone, and many thanks.
Peter.
????? The above, and previous garbage he had thrown @ Rad and Still Stirring, sums up the OP really, at least for me.I honestly thought I was dealing with an authoritative member and that was how the forum was run, I figured I had no recourse and was not going to just walk away under those circumstances, so thinking I had nothing to lose, I let fly with swearing and personal attacks.