Anyone Else Notice?

[Hank Reardon]

Did everyone all of a sudden realise what they were doing and rushed off to post nice things in other threads?

Come on, it was a cool conversation

Not quite yet, I'm here. And, I'm not in a politically correct frame of mind.... shocker.

[jb-texshine]

Did everyone all of a sudden realise what they were doing and rushed off to post nice things in other threads?

Come on, it was a cool conversation

Naa,just going back and forth .

[xyz123]

Did everyone all of a sudden realise what they were doing and rushed off to post nice things in other threads?

Come on, it was a cool conversation

Not quite yet, I'm here. And, I'm not in a politically correct frame of mind.... shocker.

There is a politically correct frame of mind?, mind you politics are discouraged, read the rules re: them.

How can one not be political in an environment that has a political agenda, hypothetically of course?

In order to say anything one would have to be true neutral, do you have to post through a column of at least 1.2 mtrs? With a prescribed HETP?

How can a person not talk in a political way if they are a product of the political nature of the place they are talking in?

Oh, does one have to suscribe to the politics that are the end all and be all of the surroundings they find themselves in. In which case, how can one then be true to ones self and actually explore the world, hypothetically?

[Hank Reardon]

Did everyone all of a sudden realise what they were doing and rushed off to post nice things in other threads?

Come on, it was a cool conversation

Not quite yet, I'm here. And, I'm not in a politically correct frame of mind.... shocker.

There is a politically correct frame of mind?, mind you politics are discouraged, read the rules re: them.

How can one not be political in an environment that has a political agenda, hypothetically of course?

In order to say anything one would have to be true neutral, do you have to post through a column of at least 1.2 mtrs? With a prescribed HETP?

How can a person not talk in a political way if they are a product of the political nature of the place they are talking in?

Oops. you've gone one too far.

Hypothetically, you fall under the same group of the aforementioned. Good luck with baiting folks with this drivel. Try the local pub where they think you are some sort of socratean disciple.

You take both sides, use clever tactics of derision and loose association, and somehow figure you are the guy. You are not someone I support, nor are your weak-minded ideas.

[xyz123]

So you are then implying you know my ideas?

Please, elaborate, it would seem that you are now more politically correct than you vaunted you were earlier.

[Swedish Pride]

actually going back to re read that thread brought me to an interestign thread about fermentation controll, something I have to work on bettering
http://homedistiller.org/forum/viewtopi ... =1&t=42602

[xyz123]

actually going back to re read that thread brought me to an interestign thread about fermentation controll, something I have to work on bettering
http://homedistiller.org/forum/viewtopi ... =1&t=42602

That depends what you are making.....

If you are making a Rum/Bourbon/Whiskey, you want that quick fermented profile....... Have a look at the ferment times of the big boys.

[Hank Reardon]

So you are then implying you know my ideas?

Please, elaborate, it would seem that you are now more politically correct than you vaunted you were earlier.

No, not politically correct. Nor politically motivated. However, you are. I think you PM'd me your maiden handle in this thread, and it is in the list of folks that have become <desirable.
'
Anyway, you do your thing and bait as many as you can. I'm not in the game for cheap affiliations that drive a wedge. I'm in it for folks who have helped me become a better version of myself in this craft. Those are folks like Crow, Butch, Tater, NCHooch, Woodshed, Pint, bentstick, Ujesse, and others. While I may disagree with incremental choices they make, it does not mean I am a friend of a nuclear bomber.

Your affiliation is about devolution, destruction, and whatever other feeble thoughts flow through your brain.

[Swedish Pride]

actually going back to re read that thread brought me to an interestign thread about fermentation controll, something I have to work on bettering
http://homedistiller.org/forum/viewtopi ... =1&t=42602

That depends what you are making.....

If you are making a Rum/Bourbon/Whiskey, you want that quick fermented profile....... Have a look at the ferment times of the big boys.

Still I've no control at all in place, big variations in temp for me, from 35c pitch to 20c at the end of the fermentation

[thecroweater]

Let's get one thing very clear here, nobody causes anyone to get removed. That can only be caused by ones own actions end of story. Point two I'm reading over and over about 2 lost members but only read about one. From what I've read the other has a few weeks "time out" in read only. If he doesn't return that will be solely his choice . I'm not too comfortable in discussing the other member as he is not here to defend his actions and I have no idea if or when he will ever have that oppertunity. All I can say is admin posted that he had been cautioned and put in read only repeatedly and admin had come to the conclusion that the action taken was in the best interest of the forum. I can't see much value in pissing and moaning about this over and over as if this changes it would be a matter between the said member and admin not any other Tom Dick and Harry

[xyz123]

So you are then implying you know my ideas?

Please, elaborate, it would seem that you are now more politically correct than you vaunted you were earlier.

No, not politically correct. Nor politically motivated. However, you are. I think you PM'd me your maiden handle in this thread, and it is in the list of folks that have become <desirable.
'
Anyway, you do your thing and bait as many as you can. I'm not in the game for cheap affiliations that drive a wedge. I'm in it for folks who have helped me become a better version of myself in this craft. Those are folks like Crow, Butch, Tater, NCHooch, Woodshed, Pint, bentstick, Ujesse, and others. While I may disagree with incremental choices they make, it does not mean I am a friend of a nuclear bomber.

Your affiliation is about devolution, destruction, and whatever other feeble thoughts flow through your brain.

Cool, I am good with that, yes, you are right, I disclosed to you that I am Inglishill.

The thing that you fail to understand is that I have always had the best of interests of this messageboard at heart.

It seems, that the authorities are beginning to see that.

Thing is, I can always come back, if you read the various different personas I have had you will notice, bar giving RAD shit, and Odin, or the whakamole group, all I do is try to help people out.

I should get banned for this, again, but that does not mean I will not come back, which I will, forever, until Tater capitulates and lets me have my username back, as I told him I would abide by his rules........

The latest move by the management only reinforces what I have been saying for so long.

Hey Tataer, let me back and I will tow your line, I like your site and I respect what you have here, and I have tried to bury that bone many a time.

[Hank Reardon]

Let's get one thing very clear here, nobody causes anyone to get removed. That can only be caused by ones own actions end of story. Point two I'm reading over and over about 2 lost members but only read about one. From what I've read the other has a few weeks "time out" in read only. If he doesn't return that will be solely his choice . I'm not too comfortable in discussing the other member as he is not here to defend his actions and I have no idea if or when he will ever have that oppertunity. All I can say is admin posted that he had been cautioned and put in read only repeatedly and admin had come to the conclusion that the action taken was in the best interest of the forum. I can't see much value in pissing and moaning about this over and over as if this changes it would be a matter between the said member and admin not any other Tom Dick and Harry

We can agree to disagree. I saw some trolling that went on beyond the thread where the choice was made. My point was to express my displeasure with the calibration of discipline publicly disclosed. It is obvious that the "fight" was staged, regardless of the reaction. It is obvious the protagonists are among us, and that is the issue.

If you disagree with my assessment, you can always call me out, and I'm happy to discuss the facts as I see them.

[Tater]

No Inglishill. 123xyz you will banned again , However you now have the honor of being banned more then then any another troll.Hank if ya don't like way forums are run go to Inglishill site he a admin on his NZ distilling site.Thats right a admin from another distilling site trolls here .The month in read only for still stirring stands as well as forever for rad.Wasn't anyone but themselves that got them banned.Still stirring want to return thats up to him.I do see what your saying hank .Reckin as you have less then a year here and Ive been around since 2002 I might know little more then you on what goes on over time.

[ShineonCrazyDiamond]

Ha. Busy week. Couldn't help but think of this

[WIski]

Noone is perfect. The last perfect sole to walk the earth was crucified. Good people make mistakes even those that know better and have been warned. Certain personalities have a propensity to get pulled into situations that under normal circumstances they would deduce it not reasonable or valuable. Evil minded intelligent ones know these things and bait these personalities out for their own gain and satisfaction. Weeding out the truly bad is the difficult part. I hope the good one returns..........