Texas judge rules home distilling ban UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Discussion and plans for legalizing our hobby.

Moderator: Site Moderator

User avatar
bluefish_dist
Distiller
Posts: 1503
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2015 10:13 am
Location: Eastern Ia

Re: Texas judge rules home distilling ban UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Post by bluefish_dist »

Having had my license, just being able to have the still at your home and having to get a license makes it a no go for me. Reporting is a pain and unless you are good with numbers, you really need one of the ttb reporting programs.

For me the preferred outcome would be to have either up to X sized still or so many gallons of wash per year legal like home brew. A less desirable outcome, but still ok would be a home license where you pay taxes quarterly or yearly. At $2.70 a proof gallon, who really cares about paying the taxes of that’s what it takes to be legal.
Formerly
Dsp-CO-20051
AlZilla
Novice
Posts: 82
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2018 4:20 pm

Re: Texas judge rules home distilling ban UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Post by AlZilla »

Requiring a license or anything else would do nothing to stop people who want to make and sell bootleg liquor.
User avatar
6 Row Joe
Trainee
Posts: 767
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:16 pm

Re: Texas judge rules home distilling ban UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Post by 6 Row Joe »

bluefish_dist wrote: Tue Aug 13, 2024 3:15 pm Having had my license, just being able to have the still at your home and having to get a license makes it a no go for me. Reporting is a pain and unless you are good with numbers, you really need one of the ttb reporting programs.

For me the preferred outcome would be to have either up to X sized still or so many gallons of wash per year legal like home brew. A less desirable outcome, but still ok would be a home license where you pay taxes quarterly or yearly. At $2.70 a proof gallon, who really cares about paying the taxes of that’s what it takes to be legal.
I like the way you think.
I don't drink alcohol, I drink distilled spirits.
Therefore I'm not a alcoholic, I'm spiritual.
User avatar
Yonder
Trainee
Posts: 933
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2017 1:53 pm
Location: Best State in the Union!

Re: Texas judge rules home distilling ban UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Post by Yonder »

Herein lies the problem. Money and influence. The organization has both. There are currently over 700 jobs in Texas that require a state permission. The established business community is all in for restricting competition and their lobbying pays politicians to help. You think our hobby will play out differently? You have another think coming. Sorry to be a downer but I’ve fought this monster before.
Double, Double, toil and trouble. Fire Burn and pot still bubble.
User avatar
Twisted Brick
Master of Distillation
Posts: 4093
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 4:54 pm
Location: Craigh Na Dun

Re: Texas judge rules home distilling ban UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Post by Twisted Brick »

bluefish_dist wrote: Tue Aug 13, 2024 3:15 pm
For me the preferred outcome would be to have either up to X sized still or so many gallons of wash per year legal like home brew. A less desirable outcome, but still ok would be a home license where you pay taxes quarterly or yearly. At $2.70 a proof gallon, who really cares about paying the taxes of that’s what it takes to be legal.
The idea of taxing everyday citizens for creating a product strictly for personal use is abhorrent. Concentrate enforcement of penalties for selling but leave the hobbyists alone. Since day one homebrewers and winemakers have remained untaxed. What justification exists to implement taxation on homedistillers?

This outcome amounts to extortion, where an act is deemed illegal, but if the violator is willing to pay money to continue his 'illicit' acts, the government will look the other way. As unreasonable as the concept of instituting a 'per proof-gallon tax' for hobbyists is, collecting it would appear, just like prohibiting homedistilling, highly impractical.

US states' increasing embrace of homedistilling legalization is positive, and slowly making inroads. Perhaps the latest federal ruling will help move the ball at the state level.
“Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite, and furthermore, always carry a small snake.”

- W.C. Fields

My EZ Solder Shotgun
My Steam Rig and Manometer
Bolverk
Posts: 1509
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2023 7:44 pm
Location: NC

Re: Texas judge rules home distilling ban UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Post by Bolverk »

Twisted Brick wrote: Wed Aug 14, 2024 10:00 am
The idea of taxing everyday citizens for creating a product strictly for personal use is abhorrent. Concentrate enforcement of penalties for selling but leave the hobbyists alone. Since day one homebrewers and winemakers have remained untaxed. What justification exists to implement taxation on homedistillers?

This outcome amounts to extortion, where an act is deemed illegal, but if the violator is willing to pay money to continue his 'illicit' acts, the government will look the other way. As unreasonable as the concept of instituting a 'per proof-gallon tax' for hobbyists is, collecting it would appear, just like prohibiting homedistilling, highly impractical.
Hear F'ing hear!
There are two types of people in this world.
1. Those that can extrapolate from incomplete information.
User avatar
Saltbush Bill
Site Mod
Posts: 10364
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 2:13 am
Location: Northern NSW Australia

Re: Texas judge rules home distilling ban UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Post by Saltbush Bill »

Well said TB.....some good points made.
User avatar
acfixer69
Global moderator
Posts: 5121
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 3:34 pm
Location: CT USA

Re: Texas judge rules home distilling ban UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Post by acfixer69 »

Paying Fed income taxes on the social security money I receive, which was taxed as a payroll tax, then taxed again to buy a grain bill at the store, then pay fee's and taxes on fuels to run the still and tax me for personnel consumption on home new make. Fuck that.
User avatar
LWTCS
Site Mod
Posts: 12965
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:04 pm
Location: Treasure Coast

Re: Texas judge rules home distilling ban UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Post by LWTCS »

acfixer69 wrote: Wed Aug 14, 2024 3:50 pm Paying Fed income taxes on the social security money I receive, which was taxed as a payroll tax, then taxed again to buy a grain bill at the store, then pay fee's and taxes on fuels to run the still and tax me for personnel consumption on home new make. Fuck that.
100%
Trample the injured and hurdle the dead.
AlZilla
Novice
Posts: 82
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2018 4:20 pm

Re: Texas judge rules home distilling ban UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Post by AlZilla »

Well, the government appealed. Don't ya love your government waging war on you with your own money?

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/ta ... government

The above lnk now seems to be behind a paywall. Sorry.
Here's the Notice of Appeal:
Attachments
gov.uscourts.txnd.384014.51.0.pdf
(147.9 KiB) Downloaded 114 times
wscywabbit
Novice
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2023 9:29 am

Re: Texas judge rules home distilling ban UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Post by wscywabbit »

Well this was to be expected. The first hurdle is done. Move onto the 5th Circuit court. Assuming they uphold the lower court's decision, the ATF will appeal again. Then it will hopefully go to the Supreme court and be put to bed for good. One step at a time. I do believe that it will come out in our favor in the end, it will just take time. At the very least, I think it may become "up to the purvue of the states" and not within the jurisdiction of federal ABC's.
User avatar
Yummyrum
Global moderator
Posts: 8602
Joined: Sat Jul 06, 2013 2:23 am
Location: Fraser Coast QLD Aussie

Re: Texas judge rules home distilling ban UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Post by Yummyrum »

The whole thing misses the point in my opinion .
If it is OK to produce x amount of wine and beer a year tax free fir personal consumption , why should one then be taxed when that same alcohol is distilled .

That I believe is the ridiculous point that a Judge in New Zealand realised.
User avatar
LWTCS
Site Mod
Posts: 12965
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:04 pm
Location: Treasure Coast

Re: Texas judge rules home distilling ban UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Post by LWTCS »

.........
Attachments
IMG_20240816_202703.jpg
Trample the injured and hurdle the dead.
User avatar
acfixer69
Global moderator
Posts: 5121
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 3:34 pm
Location: CT USA

Re: Texas judge rules home distilling ban UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Post by acfixer69 »

LWTCS wrote: Fri Aug 16, 2024 4:27 pm.........
And in the end If there is any thing left Toys, Cars, Property to give your children. They tax them on the inheritance. That said in a non political speaking tone mind you.
AlZilla
Novice
Posts: 82
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2018 4:20 pm

Re: Texas judge rules home distilling ban UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Post by AlZilla »

Yummyrum wrote: Fri Aug 16, 2024 1:36 pm The whole thing misses the point in my opinion .
If it is OK to produce x amount of wine and beer a year tax free fir personal consumption , why should one then be taxed when that same alcohol is distilled .

That I believe is the ridiculous point that a Judge in New Zealand realised.
Unless congress acts and legalizes home distillation, it's going to take long, painful and expensive litigation. Being appealed now means this case will be another year or two crawling through the appellate courts. Then another appeal to the US Supreme Court, maybe. Then another year or two horsing around there. Not to mention a flood of cash.

Even then, as you say it's not unshackling home distillation. It's just creating a felony shell game.

It might be a small step in the right direction, or it might be a case of poking the sleeping bear.
User avatar
kiwi Bruce
Distiller
Posts: 2400
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Transplanted Kiwi living in the States

Re: Texas judge rules home distilling ban UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Post by kiwi Bruce »

Don't these agencies run on a budget? The ATF and it's appendiges must be crapping their resources on defending the Second Amendment cases. Do they have anything left in the tank to fight the home distilling ruling? And speaking of the 2A the 9th district court (just 3 hours ago {9:30 now}) ruled the the ban on fully automatic weapons is unconstitutional. This will cause a full blown "crap" hurricane, not just a storm. The ATF and it's appendiges will spend whatever it takes to fight this! ! ! :clap: :lol:
(It breaks my heart, but) I've finally decided my future lies
Beyond the yellow brick road...from Elton John
User avatar
Yonder
Trainee
Posts: 933
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2017 1:53 pm
Location: Best State in the Union!

Re: Texas judge rules home distilling ban UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Post by Yonder »

The 5th circuit is a good one. Hope for the best.
Double, Double, toil and trouble. Fire Burn and pot still bubble.
User avatar
kiwi Bruce
Distiller
Posts: 2400
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Transplanted Kiwi living in the States

Re: Texas judge rules home distilling ban UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Post by kiwi Bruce »

Yonder wrote: Thu Aug 22, 2024 9:08 pm The 5th circuit is a good one. Hope for the best.
Was it the 5th circuit ?...I got my courts mixed up! :crazy:
(It breaks my heart, but) I've finally decided my future lies
Beyond the yellow brick road...from Elton John
The Booze Pipe
Rumrunner
Posts: 623
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2015 5:00 pm
Location: PNW

Re: Texas judge rules home distilling ban UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Post by The Booze Pipe »

Death to (Federal) taxes
13.5g/50L keg
modular 3" pot/VM copper&stainless w/offset gin head
26g 4" stripping still
5500watts of fury
User avatar
kiwi Bruce
Distiller
Posts: 2400
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Transplanted Kiwi living in the States

Re: Texas judge rules home distilling ban UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Post by kiwi Bruce »

wscywabbit wrote: Fri Aug 30, 2024 6:26 am As of the time that Clawhammer created that video, there hadn't been an appeal yet. They posted that on July 29th and the appeal was filed August 14th...


The Federal Government DIDN'T file an appeal yet, according to Carl from Clawhammer Supply...watch

Ok then...I'm full of crap, sorry all!
Last edited by kiwi Bruce on Fri Aug 30, 2024 8:06 am, edited 2 times in total.
(It breaks my heart, but) I've finally decided my future lies
Beyond the yellow brick road...from Elton John
wscywabbit
Novice
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2023 9:29 am

Re: Texas judge rules home distilling ban UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Post by wscywabbit »

As of the time that Clawhammer created that video, there hadn't been an appeal yet. They posted that on July 29th and the appeal was filed August 14th...
Bolverk
Posts: 1509
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2023 7:44 pm
Location: NC

Re: Texas judge rules home distilling ban UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Post by Bolverk »

Per the HDA today

"The government did file today we are still gathering more information and should have a blog within the next day or two."

Updates coming soon hopefully
There are two types of people in this world.
1. Those that can extrapolate from incomplete information.
Bolverk
Posts: 1509
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2023 7:44 pm
Location: NC

Re: Texas judge rules home distilling ban UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Post by Bolverk »

Per the HDA today

We are a little tardy in getting this information to you, but still work to keep you updated on everything going on with the HDA.

On October 28 the Department of Justice (DOJ) filed its merit brief for their argument against the original ruling back in June, when Judge Mark Pittman ruled in favor of the Hobby Distillers Association (for more on that ruling see our previous post here).  The government was given 14 days to file an emergency appeal and keep the stay on the ruling in place, but declined to do so.  As a result, when the 14 day period ended it made it possible for HDA members to obtain a permit to distill in their home (all other requirements for the permit were unchanged).

Although the government did not immediately appeal the decision it did not preclude them from being able to file an appeal.  They did so on October 28, and now our case will head to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.  The time for the appeals process is unknown, however, it is very important to note that while the appeal process is ongoing HDA members are still able to obtain a permit for distilling at home.  You still must meet all regular requirements in order for your permit to be approved, such as maintaining specific locks on doors, etc.  What has been removed through the original ruling is the location requirement, which precluded one from having a distillery in their home.  It is also worth reminding you that you must be a HDA member in order to be covered by the ruling.

How this will play out is obviously to be determined, but rest assured that we will be working to keep you updated as information becomes available.
There are two types of people in this world.
1. Those that can extrapolate from incomplete information.
User avatar
Twisted Brick
Master of Distillation
Posts: 4093
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 4:54 pm
Location: Craigh Na Dun

Re: Texas judge rules home distilling ban UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Post by Twisted Brick »

Thanks for the update, Bolverk.
“Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite, and furthermore, always carry a small snake.”

- W.C. Fields

My EZ Solder Shotgun
My Steam Rig and Manometer
Post Reply