your example of fuel is sorely misguided. temp plays a part in the cracking process...but they are called cat- crackers not fuel distillers -since cut and pastes demonstrate one's google prowess here:
In petrochemistry, petroleum geology and organic chemistry, cracking is the process whereby complex organic molecules such as kerogens or long-chain hydrocarbons are broken down into simpler molecules such as light hydrocarbons, by the breaking of carbon-carbon bonds in the precursors. The rate of cracking and the end products are strongly dependent on the temperature and presence of catalysts. Cracking is the breakdown of a large alkane into smaller, more useful alkenes. Simply put, hydrocarbon cracking is the process of breaking a long-chain of hydrocarbons into short ones. This process requires high temperatures.[1]
More loosely, outside the field of petroleum chemistry, the term "cracking" is used to describe any type of splitting of molecules under the influence of heat, catalysts and solvents, such as in processes of destructive distillation or pyrolysis.
(wow, i see why that works, do seem smarter to you guys? i feel smarter already. mmm...pyrolysis. I'm gonna use this at the next party, the chicks will dig it!)
part of the petro chemical plant's mandate would be operational efficiency. turning the 128MM Btu furnace off and on a 100 times a second is going to be the last thing on their minds. the only useful info there is they do draw from different trays. on a 10 story stack.
the istill example is ill informed. you don't write the code for Odin, so which temp he monitors on a
continuous bases is not likely anything to do with setting a temperature to boil at and waiting for 10 hours for the last drop of acetone to leak out, moving the temp to 195 and waiting another 28 hours for the last drop of hearts to finally break free. i mean really, do you see a pro distiller taking 10 days to distil a 5000L charge???
I don't want to speak to his process (i don't write the code either) but there is a difference in "based on continuous temperature measurements...." and using a PID to control the temperature of the boil.
it's still about the right tool for the job. if you are making beer and you want to hold a temp on your mash, a PID would work well,
arguably a PID could be used for distilling (if, practically speaking) you set the temp above the boil so stays "on" but why use a tool to do that, which was obviously designed for something else, does it not make sense to use the tool that is designed to stay "on"?...and if you are touting the misguided "hold 172* until all the methanol is out" idea, i would call that evapouration, not distillation.
since we are the "home distillers" site, not the "home evaporators" site. i don't see the sense in pursuing this particular PID idea as a way to benefit the membership.
since it's about bending language...you say hold boil temp...i say evaporation.
show us a build, show us data. show us time to go with the temps, show us of the operational efficiency and improvement of quality. I'm weary of the analogous google searches to make the language more palatable.
It's time to move from theorizing, show the hypothesis. Build an experiment, make it duplicatable so it can be peer reviewed. let's see the data.
I finally quit drinking for good.
now i drink for evil.