Page 18 of 18
Re: H.R. 2903 is up to 83 co-sponsors...
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2017 8:40 am
by SouthTexasShine
I saw that the tax law that was just signed included a lot of what HR 2903 included. Was any of the home distilling language included?
https://whiskycast.com/distillers-cheer ... m-changes/
Re: H.R. 2903 is up to 83 co-sponsors...
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 5:20 am
by rgreen2002
Doesn't look like it:
S.236 - Craft Beverage Modernization and Tax Reform Act of 2017 . This is a copy of the Craft Beverage Modernization and Tax Reform Act of 2017 that the article mentioned was "folded in". It had nothing regarding home distilling. I still think the way to go is at the individual state level. Considering we had reps from multiple states it seems more feasible. IMHO.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87125/871253ae3f8698571f2cd4235ce26a4340a3ea8b" alt="Mr. Green :mrgreen:"
Re: H.R. 2903 is up to 83 co-sponsors...
Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2017 10:43 pm
by Bearded-and-Bored
I just read about it too.
http://www.myrecordjournal.com/News/Sta ... taxes.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
If I had a brewery or distillery I'd be over the moon about the new tax rules, but right now I'm pretty deflated. I just did a quick read through of the new tax bill's relevant sections (pages 520-531). No mention of home distilling, but notably the rules regarding home brewing and wine making are very clearly in there. Here's the link if you want to check it out.
https://www.congress.gov/115/crpt/hrpt4 ... rpt466.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow Looks like they left us out entirely. There was an awful lot of paper shuffling going on, so it could have been slipped in there easily, but without someone to remind them (or push them) to add it at the last minute it just got left out...again. Without the lobbyist to shoe horn it into someone's additions nobody was going to just do us the favor.
I hope I'm wrong, but it seems like this was another missed opportunity. It just looked like chaos from the outside, so it is a complete surprise to me that they got the language from the Craft Beverage Modernization and Tax Reform Act added in the first place. Unless we get a miracle in the form of a late addition during the "fixes" they plan to make next year I think we're back at square one. I should stop posting when I'm depressed. Sorry guys.
Re: H.R. 2903 is up to 83 co-sponsors...
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2017 2:38 pm
by jb-texshine
Wheres Rick or Tom at with a update.u
Re: H.R. 2903 is up to 83 co-sponsors...
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2017 12:26 pm
by RaymieDubbs
So nothing in the bill about distilling specifically but is there a possibility TTB will be less funded? I was just on their website and they have a banner at the top specifically talking about the tax act. Less funding = less heat from the TTB?
Re: H.R. 2903 is up to 83 co-sponsors...
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:59 am
by LWTCS
RaymieDubbs wrote:So nothing in the bill about distilling specifically but is there a possibility TTB will be less funded? I was just on their website and they have a banner at the top specifically talking about the tax act. Less funding = less heat from the TTB?
Thats a plausible statement.
Re: H.R. 2903 is up to 83 co-sponsors...
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:24 am
by Bushman
Interesting thought!
Re: H.R. 2903 is up to 83 co-sponsors...
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2018 12:54 pm
by rgreen2002
RaymieDubbs wrote:So nothing in the bill about distilling specifically but is there a possibility TTB will be less funded? I was just on their website and they have a banner at the top specifically talking about the tax act. Less funding = less heat from the TTB?
Soooo our best chance at home distilling in peace is government apathy...? I'll take it!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87125/871253ae3f8698571f2cd4235ce26a4340a3ea8b" alt="Mr. Green :mrgreen:"