Page 1 of 1
Faux pas?
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:15 am
by kingearwig
For those of you pondering and now thinking about using a little "stash" in your wash, there are a few things that should be understood before you do. First, if Marijuana was to be used unprocessed (i.e. strait from your stash without any alteration other than separation, like you would do if you were going to use it to smoke), the water solubles in the unprocessed plant would dissolves in the brew, leading to a POWERFUL off-taste.
This is from the homedistiller.org site. Is it really against the rules to discuss this? This subject interests me greatly. And most of the stuff I discuss on this forum is illegal anyway
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:21 am
by new_moonshiner
I think Uncle Jessie already addressed this matter correct me if Im wrong but i think there is to be no talk of it what so ever on the forums..seems he said that not too long ago..
yeh
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:22 am
by Uncle Jesse
Read the rules.
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:23 am
by Aidas
Here's the pertinent one:
6. No discussions of illicit drugs, their extraction, manufacture or improvement. These forums are for discussing the creation and enjoyment of high quality spirits, not the promotion of mind altering substances.
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:28 am
by new_moonshiner
I have seen some of pint and wineo's stuff that could be considered mind altering substances but it was in liquid form . j/k
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:02 pm
by kingearwig
I just wanted to ask because the site and the forum are affiliated. I did read that rule and then when I read that quote on the site I felt compelled to question the rule.
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:10 pm
by HookLine
The are only two rules on this forum...
RULE 1: Uncle Jesse makes the rules.
RULE 2: When in doubt about a rule, see RULE 1.
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:35 pm
by new_moonshiner
lol good point hook.
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:03 pm
by Husker
kingearwig wrote:I just wanted to ask because the site and the forum are affiliated. I did read that rule and then when I read that quote on the site I felt compelled to question the rule.
The parent site, and the forums are affiliated in this way.
UJ owns the server.
Thus, UJ is the server host for the
http://homedistiller.org" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow site, but it is Tony's (not UJ's). The
http://homedistiller.org/forum" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow ARE UJ's. Both owning the server, and being forum owner of the content.
Thus, read rule #1 listed a couple posts above
H.