Is splashing in an LM slant-plate bottom plate a "problem"?
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 11:47 am
I've read that in a slant plate LM still (boka style) having the slant plates too far apart can cause excessive vertical drop from the top plate to the bottom resulting in "splashing". This makes sense. Of course, conversely if the plate separation is too close then you get a bottleneck in the vapor path... which is of course, bad.
But what I'm wondering is, "Is excessive gap/drop and potential splashing necessarily a BAD thing?" I mean, if any of the collected distillate splashes out of the bottom slant plate, it just falls down the column increasing the reflux ratio. How is this a bad thing? In fact, the only situation in which I can think this might be a problem is when running a boka in "potstill" mode for maximum takeoff rate - you wouldn't want unintended reflux falling back down the column.
Anyways, if splashing is actually a concern in slant plate column designs, could the top plate be recontoured to direct flow to the sidewall where they could channel down the sidewalls of the column intil the bottom plate intercepts the flow? Or maybe the pagoda/cup-and-tee LM design is better than the slant plate. Just some a thoughts.
But what I'm wondering is, "Is excessive gap/drop and potential splashing necessarily a BAD thing?" I mean, if any of the collected distillate splashes out of the bottom slant plate, it just falls down the column increasing the reflux ratio. How is this a bad thing? In fact, the only situation in which I can think this might be a problem is when running a boka in "potstill" mode for maximum takeoff rate - you wouldn't want unintended reflux falling back down the column.
Anyways, if splashing is actually a concern in slant plate column designs, could the top plate be recontoured to direct flow to the sidewall where they could channel down the sidewalls of the column intil the bottom plate intercepts the flow? Or maybe the pagoda/cup-and-tee LM design is better than the slant plate. Just some a thoughts.