Some linguistics for non-linguists

Little or nothing to do with distillation.

Moderator: Site Moderator

User avatar
HDNB
Site Mod
Posts: 7360
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 10:04 am
Location: the f-f-fu frozen north

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by HDNB »

there is all kinds of localisms in canada. one of the most common is the ending of a sentence with eh? (pronounced hey?) it means the same thing as a brit or an aus saying "yeah?" at the end of theirs....do you agree with my statement? yeah?

some of the most confusing ones come from Newfoundland and other points east in canada, like "how's your feet an ears?" the meaning is obvious; it's friggin cold there too, so literally is anything at risk of freezing off at the moment? or in a warm house meaning the same, "is everything good in your world?"
the rest of Canada uses something along the lines of "Howzit goin' eh?"

this one confounds me....in newfienese (what we teasingly call our friend's linguistics from the "rock") they say "where ya to?" and that apparently means "Where are you from" (what town, are you a bayman or a townie?)
Newfoundland has the most colorful language and accent of all of Canada by a long measure. You'll know one when you meet one. They are also fundamentally some of the best humans you'll meet too.
I finally quit drinking for good.

now i drink for evil.
Eire Whiskey

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by Eire Whiskey »

Weird. I would have thought reading "where ya to" would mean where ya going, or where ya off to, where are you going, etc.
What always got me was pop and soda in the US.
Having traveled to several countries and all over the US, I barely notice the differences in English, except Chinglish, it's all goofed up. You'd think while they are stealing everyone elses tech, they would also grab some Engish language books. Chinglish is as bad as ebonics.
User avatar
Twisted Brick
Master of Distillation
Posts: 3771
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 4:54 pm
Location: Craigh Na Dun

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by Twisted Brick »

Eire Whiskey wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2020 7:34 am Weird. I would have thought reading "where ya to" would mean where ya going, or where ya off to, where are you going, etc.

Many years back, I used to watch a cajun cooking show on tv hosted by an entertaining guy (Justin Wilson) who said this frequently during his demonstrations, and innocently picked it up. Same kinda (southern?) thing, starting a sentence off in one tense, but finishing it in the past tense

"So, what I'm gonna did..."
HDNB wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2020 6:53 am some of the most confusing ones come from Newfoundland and other points east in canada, like "how's your feet an ears?" the meaning is obvious; it's friggin cold there too, so literally is anything at risk of freezing off at the moment? or in a warm house meaning the same, "is everything good in your world?"
the rest of Canada uses something along the lines of "Howzit goin' eh?"
The guys getting together to have a beer just ask "how's it hangin'?"
“Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite, and furthermore, always carry a small snake.”

- W.C. Fields

My EZ Solder Shotgun
My Steam Rig and Manometer
User avatar
Boozewaves
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 231
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2017 6:16 am
Location: Wales , UK , 3rd planet , milky way

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by Boozewaves »

VLAGAVULVIN wrote: Wed Dec 18, 2019 9:38 am May I address a bit strange question to the native BE, AE, CE, NZE and other native speakers, please? :egeek:

"Jane's house, that we visited yesterday, is in terrible state" — what's wrong/odd in this expression from your own point of view?

First / intuitive / average opinions are highly appreciated.

Thank y'all..
I studied sciences and languages in my non native language and i'm thick as fuck, the differrence is how much you want to learn , proof is in the pudding . at the end of the day you will come out on top if you are determined to learn , persistence pays .
Become a distiller : start here viewtopic.php?t=52975
User avatar
Yonder
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 832
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2017 1:53 pm
Location: Best State in the Union!

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by Yonder »

”Many years back, I used to watch a cajun cooking show on tv hosted by an entertaining guy (Justin Wilson“

Damn me, I used ta love that ole man. Even bought one a his books on cooking. Remember one day he grabbed the wrong spice, realized what he’d done and tossed it aside sayin’ “Take yourself outta here an’ don’t brought you back!” Then went on cooking.
Double, Double, toil and trouble. Fire Burn and pot still bubble.
User avatar
Twisted Brick
Master of Distillation
Posts: 3771
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 4:54 pm
Location: Craigh Na Dun

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by Twisted Brick »

Yeah, he's one of the reasons to this day I will never turn down a plate of spicy jambalaya or bowl of gumbo.
“Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite, and furthermore, always carry a small snake.”

- W.C. Fields

My EZ Solder Shotgun
My Steam Rig and Manometer
User avatar
VLAGAVULVIN
Distiller
Posts: 1457
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2018 4:52 am
Location: Western Urals

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by VLAGAVULVIN »

Eire Whiskey wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2020 7:34 am Weird. I would have thought reading "where ya to" would mean where ya going, or where ya off to, where are you going, etc.
What always got me was pop and soda in the US.
It's more or less like "where [are] ya [about] to [go back]?". But it's just my guess, eh? Here in Russia, the northern frost also pushes us to use more narrow vowels, "chopped" expressions and so on. The Russian South would still try opening his mouth wide while the North could finish the entire story.

Twisted Brick wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2020 8:33 am "So, what I'm gonna did..."
May I interpret it as "so, what am I going to have done..."? :)

Boozewaves wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2020 2:44 pm I studied sciences and languages in my non native language and i'm thick as fuck, the differrence is how much you want to learn , proof is in the pudding . at the end of the day you will come out on top if you are determined to learn , persistence pays .
Sounds moar like slang, but the most of it is still rather clear so, I'mma pick some stuff up, innocently all of a sudden 8)

har druckit för mycket
Eire Whiskey

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by Eire Whiskey »

I like to speak plain English, but living in the South I do have the Southern accent. My English has been influenced from countries I have been too. My mom would tell you I don't have a Southern accent. She says I sound British, but mainly because after 9 years in England with the military, and living with the Brits I picked up some of their words. A Brit would never think I had an English accent. lol
I think due to the lack of somewhat uneducated and lazy people I have to be around drives their opinion on where I am from. lol
Ebonics is just pure laziness on the part of the user.
Even on this forum with English speakers there are misunderstandings due to variations in usage and local meanings.
User avatar
HDNB
Site Mod
Posts: 7360
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 10:04 am
Location: the f-f-fu frozen north

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by HDNB »

I always find a bit of humour in the american "i'm going to go ahead" i've even heard them say a few times i'm gonna go ahead and go ahead.

at that point i think they must work for uncle sam in the department of redundancy department.

couple of years back during a seminar, the guy was gonna go ahead and go back over some of the topics that were soon-to-be the standard procedure.

nothin' odd about that there, that he went and dun did that, now is there?
I finally quit drinking for good.

now i drink for evil.
User avatar
Bushman
Admin
Posts: 17988
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 5:29 am
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by Bushman »

Why is bra singular yet scissors is plural? This thread reminded me of the redneck translator thread that was going around the forum a few years ago.
User avatar
Twisted Brick
Master of Distillation
Posts: 3771
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 4:54 pm
Location: Craigh Na Dun

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by Twisted Brick »

HDNB wrote: Sat Mar 07, 2020 7:08 am I always find a bit of humour in the american "i'm going to go ahead" i've even heard them say a few times i'm gonna go ahead and go ahead.
Yup. We Americans love that saying. As in "I'm gonna go ahead and get behind you..."

Redundant "I'm gonna go ahead" type statements can be clever. Take the tv reporter interviewing a row of hopeless fitness candidates on on their weight loss plans when a guy answers:

"Yes, I'm thinking about seriously considering doing a marathon...." Hmmm.
“Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite, and furthermore, always carry a small snake.”

- W.C. Fields

My EZ Solder Shotgun
My Steam Rig and Manometer
User avatar
HDNB
Site Mod
Posts: 7360
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 10:04 am
Location: the f-f-fu frozen north

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by HDNB »

Twisted Brick wrote: Sat Mar 07, 2020 8:34 am "I'm gonna go ahead and get behind you..."
i'm feeling not just a wee bit uncomfortable.
I finally quit drinking for good.

now i drink for evil.
User avatar
VLAGAVULVIN
Distiller
Posts: 1457
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2018 4:52 am
Location: Western Urals

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by VLAGAVULVIN »

Hehe, that 'gonna' is gonna tend a bit modal but so far, we are canning to can some laugh at this thang ;)

In Russian, bra is also singular and scissors are plural... but people is and money are.

What's interesting for me of the above: "there is all kinds of localisms in Canada" (and not "are"). Or smth. like "there are the bottles that we found" (not which or those). And the most odd thing for the people who learnt some British English at the Soviet school well is usage "this" instead of "it" in cases like "I know not so much of this". In Russian, we do use "this" and not "it" but it was making the worst lapse to say "I know this" in English lesson from the point of the teacher's view.

har druckit för mycket
User avatar
HDNB
Site Mod
Posts: 7360
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 10:04 am
Location: the f-f-fu frozen north

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by HDNB »

laziness or casualness or speed.

the difference in talking to your friends or speaking with a business associate. talking to and speaking with are the same thing; brits would almost for sure use the Queen's english in business...it was a pleasure speaking with you today, sir. Goodbye. (or "it was a pleasure speaking with you today James. Cheers " if they feel casual)

on the phone with a friend, a Canadian may (or might) say "yeah, good talkin' to ya Jimmy", and hang up without signing off. in business, it would likely be "Thanks for the help, have a good one."

here is something interesting: when calling a business that answers "hello, xyz company this is Jimmy?" a Canadian will always ask EVERYTIME: How ya doin'? Or Hi Jimmy, howzit going? or How are you today?
it must be different in the USA, when i call there (and do that out of habit) there is always a short pause on the other end while the guy rolls his eyes and thinks to himself..."another Canadian" it seems when making a business call in the states one is supposed to jump right into the task at hand without exchanging pleasantries.
"hello, xyz company this is Jimmy?"
Hi Jimmy, i need a new 1" ball valve.. can ya go ahead and help me out with that?
I finally quit drinking for good.

now i drink for evil.
User avatar
Twisted Brick
Master of Distillation
Posts: 3771
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 4:54 pm
Location: Craigh Na Dun

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by Twisted Brick »

HDNB wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2020 6:53 am
the rest of Canada uses something along the lines of "Howzit goin' eh?"
Opposite of the Italian speaking with his hands as he says: "Ah, that woman, she has beautiful legs, no?"
VLAGAVULVIN wrote: Sat Mar 07, 2020 9:18 am
What's interesting for me of the above: "there is all kinds of localisms in Canada" (and not "are").
Yeah, this drives me nuts about European/Australian sports announcers when they stuff like: "China are regrouping their defense to stop the Russians". To me, it should be "China is regrouping"...

HDNB wrote: Sat Mar 07, 2020 7:08 am
couple of years back during a seminar, the guy was gonna go ahead and go back over some of the topics that were soon-to-be the standard procedure.
See? It's not just an American thing...
“Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite, and furthermore, always carry a small snake.”

- W.C. Fields

My EZ Solder Shotgun
My Steam Rig and Manometer
The Baker
Master of Distillation
Posts: 4659
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 4:48 am
Location: Northern Victoria, Australia

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by The Baker »

Couple years back would be an Americanism, not commonly used in Australia.
A couple of years back is fine, probably anywhere.
Soon-to-be sounds fine.

And purely for interest:
If an American speaks of a woman's fanny, he means her rump, backside, rear...
But if an Australian does he means her, er, snatch/ external sexual equipment...!

Geoff
The Baker
User avatar
VLAGAVULVIN
Distiller
Posts: 1457
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2018 4:52 am
Location: Western Urals

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by VLAGAVULVIN »

Twisted Brick wrote: Sat Mar 07, 2020 10:32 am See? It's not just an American thing...
At least, still we can see of there. Okay, that's the way the languages is changing :wink:

The Baker wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2020 5:35 pm But if an Australian does he means her, er, snatch/ external sexual equipment...!
:mrgreen: Haha, in Russian, we'd say she's pizdataya, formally literally — ehm,,, cuntable!

har druckit för mycket
cob
Master of Distillation
Posts: 2691
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 4:38 pm
Location: little puffs of dust where my feet used to be

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by cob »

"soon come"
be water my friend
User avatar
contrahead
Trainee
Posts: 909
Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2013 3:43 pm
Location: Southwest

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by contrahead »

While reading an old paper-backed Western novel recently, I encountered the word “puncheon”. Determination to discover the definition of puncheon or “puncheon floor” the next day, eventually led me astray to be distracted by yet another topic. One YouTube led to another... Kilts.

(A puncheon floor is a wooden floor that's nice and flat, perhaps sanded and/or tongue and grove. “Puncheon Floor” or “Bullfrog on a Puncheon Floor” was also the name of a once very popular square dance tune in the 1800s).

To state that “No True Scotsman wears under-britches”, might be true. However No True Scotsman itself is a name for a noteworthy fallacy of logic in the discipline of philosophy.

Anyway: music videos inadvertently led to this informative video - How to fold a Scottish plaid.

When I e-mailed the link of the kilt video to an acquaintance (who's approaching 90 now- my parent's generation and he drinks expensive Scotch) he then replied with this next video...

The Scotsman
Omnia mea mecum porto
The Baker
Master of Distillation
Posts: 4659
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 4:48 am
Location: Northern Victoria, Australia

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by The Baker »

It was a barrel, too.

'The puncheon was a British unit for beer, wines and spirits.[1] It was also an American unit of capacity for wine.[2]

Historically, the puncheon has been defined somewhere between 70 to 120 imperial gallons (318 to 546 litres; 84.1 to 144 US gallons).[1]'

from Wikipedia

Geoff
The Baker
User avatar
VLAGAVULVIN
Distiller
Posts: 1457
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2018 4:52 am
Location: Western Urals

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by VLAGAVULVIN »

A vid just for lulz ;)


har druckit för mycket
tombombadil
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 540
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 2:55 pm

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by tombombadil »

It makes me think the house is in a state named terrible.
User avatar
VLAGAVULVIN
Distiller
Posts: 1457
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2018 4:52 am
Location: Western Urals

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by VLAGAVULVIN »

tombombadil wrote: Fri May 08, 2020 3:45 pm It makes me think the house is in a state named terrible.
State like territory?

har druckit för mycket
tombombadil
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 540
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 2:55 pm

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by tombombadil »

Ya, similar to "she lives in gator country" or "that restaurant is in north port city". where gator is a country, or north port is a city. I would wonder if there's a state named terrible. Like, "do you want to vacation in Florida or Terrible?"
User avatar
contrahead
Trainee
Posts: 909
Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2013 3:43 pm
Location: Southwest

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by contrahead »

english-language2.jpg
Omnia mea mecum porto
User avatar
VLAGAVULVIN
Distiller
Posts: 1457
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2018 4:52 am
Location: Western Urals

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by VLAGAVULVIN »

tombombadil wrote: Sun May 10, 2020 11:24 am Ya, similar to "she lives in gator country" or "that restaurant is in north port city". where gator is a country, or north port is a city. I would wonder if there's a state named terrible. Like, "do you want to vacation in Florida or Terrible?"
So, these are the proper names, like Gator and NorthPort (and not adjectives to "country" and "city")... hope, I got you right, thank you.

P.S. Yeah, that "ghoti's creative respelling" rules for a couple of centuries but still nobody cares of the English spelling reform. And that's not so bad "as is", in fact.

har druckit för mycket
User avatar
VLAGAVULVIN
Distiller
Posts: 1457
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2018 4:52 am
Location: Western Urals

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by VLAGAVULVIN »

Hey native speakers, may I ask you if you ever heard of "seeing" a film instead of "watching" it? Is it acceptable to see the movie in meaning of "going out to watch it" in contrast to sitting on a home sofa for the same reason? Thanx.

har druckit för mycket
seabass
Rumrunner
Posts: 626
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:08 am

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by seabass »

"Seeing" a movie implies going out to see a movie. I don't think it's proper to say you're seeing a movie if you're at home. You watch movies at home but you can watch or see a movie at the theater.
User avatar
VLAGAVULVIN
Distiller
Posts: 1457
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2018 4:52 am
Location: Western Urals

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by VLAGAVULVIN »

Thank you, Seabass!
seabass wrote: Tue Jun 09, 2020 10:21 pm You watch movies at home but you can watch or see a movie at the theater.
So, talking about that theater... seeing means definitely act of watching, not going out (as necessity of walking or driving), right?

har druckit för mycket
The Baker
Master of Distillation
Posts: 4659
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 4:48 am
Location: Northern Victoria, Australia

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Post by The Baker »

VLAGAVULVIN wrote: Tue Jun 09, 2020 9:29 pm Hey native speakers, may I ask you if you ever heard of "seeing" a film instead of "watching" it? Is it acceptable to see the movie in meaning of "going out to watch it" in contrast to sitting on a home sofa for the same reason? Thanx.
Well I first went to the movies BEFORE we had television.

As to the other I think either is probably acceptable.

Geoff
The Baker
Post Reply