Page 1 of 6

Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 9:38 am
by VLAGAVULVIN
May I address a bit strange question to the native BE, AE, CE, NZE and other native speakers, please? :egeek:

"Jane's house, that we visited yesterday, is in terrible state" — what's wrong/odd in this expression from your own point of view?

First / intuitive / average opinions are highly appreciated.

Thank y'all..

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 12:01 pm
by Twisted Brick
Pardon my ignorance of BE, AE, CE, NZE (different country's form of English?)

The above expression is not odd, but is missing the following:

"Jane's house, that we visited yesterday, is in a terrible state" refers to the less-than-optimum condition (or state of affairs) that it is in.

Does that help?

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 12:17 pm
by Yummyrum
yes twisted , but it could also be taken that the state she lives in, is a terrible one. IE , if you hated bush fires , you might say Califonia is a terrible state .

Oh yes , the Enlish language is a complicated beast .

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 12:19 pm
by Saltbush Bill
The missing " a " would have been my pick also.
I was also going to point out that state could have two meanings....Yummy beat me there.

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 12:31 pm
by cayars
"Jane's house, that we visited yesterday, is in terrible state" seems fine to me just like:
Jane's house, that we visited yesterday, is in poor condition.

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 12:52 pm
by FLOB
To me, it reads like a direct translation to English from a different language like French or Spanish. So skipping the two meanings of state, the clause "that we visited yesterday" while grammatically correct isn't how it would most likely be written in the US.

We visited Jane's house yesterday and it is in a terrible state.

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 2:05 pm
by cayars
Which terrible state is it in? California, NY? The "a" may change the meaning of the sentence.
But don't listen to me. I'm the devil when it comes to grammar.

"We visited Jan's house yesterday and it sucks." :)

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 2:33 pm
by pope
I'm not a grammar teacher so I'd just say "We went to Jan's place yesterday, what a sh*thole." I know you've got a sense of humor so I can't tell if you're honestly asking or teasing, Vlaga!

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 3:44 pm
by The Baker
With a lot of expressions in English, and no doubt in other languages, there can often be more than one meaning. (Ambiguities).

Context is important.

Geoff

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 3:50 pm
by Kareltje
I am not allowed to answer this question as I am not an native speaker of English, but in my language it can be a normal question. Although a bit formal.
Interesting answers, though.

Posted at the same time as The Baker.
And indeed, several versions can be made.

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 4:22 pm
by shadylane
I can barely speak the language I was born to.
Anyone that's smart enough to speak more than one language
Has a leg up on me

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 5:15 pm
by cayars
shadylane wrote: Wed Dec 18, 2019 4:22 pm I can barely speak the language I was born to.
Anyone that's smart enough to speak more than one language
Has a leg up on me
Same!

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 5:23 pm
by shadylane
What I could never wrap my head around
Was the syntax difference

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 5:31 pm
by still_stirrin
There —> a place, somewhere....where?....”there”,

Their —> a possessive...who’s is it?...”their”,

They’re —> a contraction for “they are”.

All pronounced identically and often misused in linguistics, especially these forums.

Too —> excessive, or also...too much sugar, or I drank too much too!

Two —> a number...2

To —> a preposition...to do, to go, to you, to me...or a place as in “a place to go to”

Again, all pronounced the same and often misused on these forums.

Granted, not all members have been trained in our English grammer, but some of us who have been still misuse the language flagrantly.
ss

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 5:41 pm
by VLAGAVULVIN
Okay folks, you have really helped, my thanx to everyone!

"Jane's house, that we visited yesterday, is in terrible state"

So, we nailed "a" down and back,,, but how about "which" instead of "that"?

And how do you finally feel about the version like that: "The Jane's house, which we visited yesterday, is in a terrible state" ??

= thankee =
still_stirrin wrote: Wed Dec 18, 2019 5:31 pm in our English grammer
:shifty: a nice joke :shifty:

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 5:42 pm
by HDNB
my, vlagavulvin, you are a cunning linguist.

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 5:47 pm
by metalsmith
I am an engineer. English is my native tongue. I can’t comment unless you need heat transfer calculations.

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 5:48 pm
by VLAGAVULVIN
HDNB wrote: Wed Dec 18, 2019 5:42 pm my, vlagavulvin, you are a cunning linguist.
Lol, I am ))

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 5:51 pm
by VLAGAVULVIN
metalsmith wrote: Wed Dec 18, 2019 5:47 pm I am an engineer. English is my native tongue. I can’t comment unless you need heat transfer calculations.
Where did you grow up with your tongue, please?

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 7:02 pm
by The Baker
"The Jane's house, which we visited yesterday, is in a terrible state"

Jane's house means the house of Jane.

The Jane's house is not the house of Jane. The Jane is not the same as Jane. The Jane is something, dunno what, but it describes the ownership of the house or the kind of house. Like if I said, 'The Russian's house', maybe?

And I know who Jane is but I do not know who or what 'the Jane' is.Confusing?

Geoff

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 10:07 pm
by Yonder
Vlaga, using “which” would call for a comma, while using “that” does not. As if anyone really gave a rat’s ass.

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 10:56 pm
by VLAGAVULVIN
The Baker wrote: Wed Dec 18, 2019 7:02 pm And I know who Jane is but I do not know who or what 'the Jane' is.Confusing?
For me, it's not too confusing: 'The Russian's house' = the house of exactly that Russian person [which was contextually mentioned before]. Correct me?..
Yonder wrote: Wed Dec 18, 2019 10:07 pm Vlaga, using “which” would call for a comma, while using “that” does not. As if anyone really gave a rat’s ass.
So, is it the only difference that/which (damn!) you folks can sense for the present moment / in the modern time of English?

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:05 pm
by Twisted Brick
still_stirrin wrote: Wed Dec 18, 2019 5:31 pm There —> a place, somewhere....where?....”there”,

Their —> a possessive...who’s is it?...”their”,

They’re —> a contraction for “they are”.

No doubt, American English can be a challenge, but don't forget regional dialect (accent), potentially consistent with the diversity here on HD. Consider NASCAR owner Junior Johnson's post-race interview where he made the comment: "To know how we lost that race, all you have to do is look over they-ur at the tar's on that cow-ar." Yes, indeed.

OTOH, I forgot who (an old-timer like prairie piss or dnderhead) questioned it, but how did the Forum manage to butcher dephlegmator into deflag?

The Silliest Words in Whiskey

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:54 pm
by OtisT
The Baker wrote: Wed Dec 18, 2019 7:02 pm "The Jane's house, which we visited yesterday, is in a terrible state"

Jane's house means the house of Jane.

The Jane's house is not the house of Jane. The Jane is not the same as Jane. The Jane is something, dunno what, but it describes the ownership of the house or the kind of house. Like if I said, 'The Russian's house', maybe?

And I know who Jane is but I do not know who or what 'the Jane' is.Confusing?

Geoff
This could be the family’s last name so it would be proper to says it the way it was written. Like saying the smiths’ house, meaning a house belonging to a family with the last name of Smith.

Or possibly Jane is so famous she is known as “The Jane”, like The Rock.

Otis

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2019 12:12 am
by VLAGAVULVIN
OtisT wrote: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:54 pm Or possibly Jane is so famous she is known as “The Jane”, like The Rock.
Yepp: this is the James LaBrie that bla-bla-bla... :wink:

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2019 12:39 am
by Swedish Pride
HDNB wrote: Wed Dec 18, 2019 5:42 pm my, vlagavulvin, you are a cunning linguist.
wouldn't that be cunnilinguist ?

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2019 12:50 am
by VLAGAVULVIN
Let's keep it secret :shh:

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2019 2:38 pm
by shadylane
Twisted Brick wrote: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:05 pm No doubt, American English can be a challenge
That depends on the local accent and state of sobriety

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2019 4:09 pm
by The Baker
To speak American I hold my nose closed with my thumb and finger.
And pronounce every 't' within a word as a 'd'.

Geoff

Re: Some linguistics for non-linguists

Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2019 5:49 pm
by VLAGAVULVIN
The Baker wrote: Thu Dec 19, 2019 4:09 pm To speak American I hold my nose closed with my thumb and finger.
And pronounce every 't' within a word as a 'd'.
But then it's kinda non-rhotic South at best...