3' Column vs Pot Still
Moderator: Site Moderator
-
- Novice
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2018 8:25 pm
3' Column vs Pot Still
I've been using a 3' column without packing for whiskey/rum/bourbon for a while and can't complain about the results. But then, I don't really have anything to compare it to.
Do you think a short neck would give better results? Am I missing flavor with this 3' column?
Do you think a short neck would give better results? Am I missing flavor with this 3' column?
Re: 3' Column vs Pot Still
Does the column have a reflux condenser? If it does, there might be some difference. If it doesn't it's just a pot still with a tall riser, and the results will probably be the same as with a shorter neck.
Cheers,
Berserk
He who stumbles around in darkness with a stick is blind.
But he who sticks out in darkness is fluorescent!
Berserk
He who stumbles around in darkness with a stick is blind.
But he who sticks out in darkness is fluorescent!
Re: 3' Column vs Pot Still
It isn't really a column. All it does is raise the inlet of the condenser to a suitable height for the outlet to run into your collection jar. Call it a riser or a gooseneck, and I'm sure there are other terms as well, but don't let the newbies and Youtubers confuse you with the columns used with reflux condensers that actually do some work.
Re: 3' Column vs Pot Still
A column with only the output, so no reflux condenser is exactly like a pot-still, you will have the same product. There may be passive reflux in the column walls due to contact with ambient air (if not isolated) but it is very low, negligible.
- Saltbush Bill
- Site Mod
- Posts: 10377
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 2:13 am
- Location: Northern NSW Australia
Re: 3' Column vs Pot Still
If I understand what you mean, in this case the reflux coil will also act as a chiller of the product but no reflux therefore like a pot still.Saltbush Bill wrote: ↑Tue Nov 03, 2020 3:45 amHow is a boka with no packing ....but needs a reflux condencer to work any different to a pot still? What comes out the spout will be exactly the same.
-
- Novice
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2018 8:25 pm
Re: 3' Column vs Pot Still
Thanks for the answers all. I had initially planned to add a condenser, but never cared for neutrals. Will leave it as is.
Re: 3' Column vs Pot Still
I often do pot runs with a tall empty riser 3 or 4 feet tall (not for any good reason other than those are the lengths I have laying around). I believe there is some small benefit. Passive reflux or less entrainment? IDK but I like it better than when I've run with just inches of riser.
- still_stirrin
- Master of Distillation
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2014 7:01 am
- Location: where the buffalo roam, and the deer & antelope play
Re: 3' Column vs Pot Still
Zap...sure there is...you don’t have to bend over to change jars!
My LM/VM & Potstill: My build thread
My Cadco hotplate modification thread: Hotplate Build
My stock pot gin still: stock pot potstill
My 5-grain Bourbon recipe: Special K
My Cadco hotplate modification thread: Hotplate Build
My stock pot gin still: stock pot potstill
My 5-grain Bourbon recipe: Special K
- BlueSasquatch
- Swill Maker
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2020 6:00 am
- Location: Midwest
Re: 3' Column vs Pot Still
I would imagine the taller the riser the harder it is for the still to puke?
"In the silence of the study one can discuss theories, but only in practice one becomes an artist" - Meunier