Structured Packing

Distillation methods and improvements.

Moderator: Site Moderator

Post Reply
eljefe3126
Novice
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2022 8:41 pm

Structured Packing

Post by eljefe3126 »

In the chemical industry, this is what they call structured packing. It's layers of metal gauze (or plate), crimped into v-shaped corrugations at an angle to vertical of 45-60 degrees. Then each layer is placed back-to-back with the previous layer, so that droplets can bounce left or right as they descend like pinballs in a pachinko machine. The round bands have tabs that intercept droplets clinging to the wall of the column and redirect them to the interior where the packing is.

Has anyone here experimented with this stuff? It seems like it would be easy to make if one just had a means of corrugating strips of metal gauze.
image.png
OtisT
Master of Distillation
Posts: 3179
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 11:59 am
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Structured Packing

Post by OtisT »

I went looking to buy something like this years back, something I could slip whole into a column, but I could not find anything small enough for hobby size columns. It was all industrial size stuff. I wish you better luck than I had in my search.
Otis’ Pot and Thumper, Dimroth Condenser: Pot-n-Thumper/Dimroth
Learning to Toast: Toasting Wood
Polishing Spirits with Fruitwood: Fruitwood
Badmotivator’s Barrels: Badmo Barrels
StillerBoy
Master of Distillation
Posts: 3387
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 6:27 pm
Location: Ontario

Re: Structured Packing

Post by StillerBoy »

I'm of the view there's to much open space, plus the band with the tabs really serve nothing, as the distillate will just follow the inside the band instead of the column.. waste of time and funds compared to some other packing doing a good job for the hobbyist..

Packing need to have the least amount of open space between the them for it to work at maximum efficient..

Mars
" I know quite certainly that I myself have no special talent. Curiosity, Obsession and dogged endurance, combined with self-criticism, have brought me to my knowledge and understanding "

– Albert Einstein
User avatar
shadylane
Master of Distillation
Posts: 10363
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:54 pm
Location: Hiding In the Boiler room of the Insane asylum

Re: Structured Packing

Post by shadylane »

StillerBoy wrote: Sat Oct 01, 2022 10:22 am
Packing need to have the least amount of open space between the them for it to work at maximum efficient..
I disagree.

"Packing materials must meet a few requirements to perform effectively. They must not interact chemically with the fluids being packed. They must be strong but lightweight. They must contain enough passageways that the liquid material can flow through without obstructing the liquid or causing drops in pressure. They must also allow for the proper amount of contact between liquid and gas."


https://www.machengineering.com/random- ... d-packing/
User avatar
Saltbush Bill
Site Mod
Posts: 9675
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 2:13 am
Location: Northern NSW Australia

Re: Structured Packing

Post by Saltbush Bill »

Nice link Shady , some interesting reading.
User avatar
Stonecutter
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 1911
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2021 2:40 pm
Location: Somewhere within the Milkyway

Re: Structured Packing

Post by Stonecutter »

Saltbush Bill wrote: Sat Oct 01, 2022 6:12 pm Nice link Shady , some interesting reading.
+1
Just took a brief look. It reads easy enough.


Shady I like that quote from the link
shadylane wrote: Sat Oct 01, 2022 10:38 am without obstructing the liquid or causing drops in pressure. They must also allow for the proper amount of contact between liquid and gas."


https://www.machengineering.com/random- ... d-packing/
To focus on a single variable in order to maximize efficiency would be folly.

First you’ve got the critical selection of packing material.

And Pressure drop and liquid obstruction are intertwined with the “open space” within the column.

It gets so easy to simplify a relatively complex function like reflux because so much experimentation has been documented here already.
Freedom had been hunted round the globe; reason was considered as rebellion; and the slavery of fear had made men afraid to think. But such is the irresistible nature of truth, that all it asks, and all it wants, is the liberty of appearing.
-Thomas Paine
StillerBoy
Master of Distillation
Posts: 3387
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 6:27 pm
Location: Ontario

Re: Structured Packing

Post by StillerBoy »

Stonecutter wrote: Sat Oct 01, 2022 7:32 pm It gets so easy to simplify a relatively complex function like reflux because so much experimentation has been documented here already.
What is a "relatively complex function like reflux" mean to the hobbyist..

Refuxing is a simple activity.. it's balancing the power used with the take off rate in relation to the packing used for the highest ABV possible.. different packing material require different setting or dialing in, providing different take off rate and ABV levels..

To simplify it at the hobbyist level means the usage of a packing that provide the maximum ABV with the lease power usage and maximum take off rate in the lease amount time..

The two packing that provide such, that provide such for the hobbyist, is lava rocks of the right sizing and SSP.. yeah there are other material that "work" as packing material but are not nearly as good as those mention..

Do or take the time to do such, and determine for one self, we are hobbyist first and not working to match what professionals are doing, which in large part is what the article was written for..

Mars
" I know quite certainly that I myself have no special talent. Curiosity, Obsession and dogged endurance, combined with self-criticism, have brought me to my knowledge and understanding "

– Albert Einstein
User avatar
Stonecutter
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 1911
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2021 2:40 pm
Location: Somewhere within the Milkyway

Re: Structured Packing

Post by Stonecutter »

StillerBoy wrote: Sat Oct 01, 2022 10:22 am
Packing need to have the least amount of open space between the them for it to work at maximum efficient..

Mars

StillerBoy wrote: Sun Oct 02, 2022 1:39 pm Refuxing is a simple activity..

To simplify it at the hobbyist level means the usage of a packing that provide the maximum ABV with the lease power usage and maximum take off rate in the lease amount time..


Do or take the time to do such, and determine for one self, we are hobbyist first and not working to match what professionals are doing, which in large part is what the article was written for..

Mars
So which is it? Power usage and takeoff rate or space between packing?
Freedom had been hunted round the globe; reason was considered as rebellion; and the slavery of fear had made men afraid to think. But such is the irresistible nature of truth, that all it asks, and all it wants, is the liberty of appearing.
-Thomas Paine
User avatar
shadylane
Master of Distillation
Posts: 10363
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:54 pm
Location: Hiding In the Boiler room of the Insane asylum

Re: Structured Packing

Post by shadylane »

StillerBoy wrote: Sat Oct 01, 2022 10:22 am
the band with the tabs really serve nothing, as the distillate will just follow the inside the band instead of the column.. .

Mars
I disagree about the bands and tabs being useless.
Once upon a time folks were using centering rings to do the same job.
But everyone was using rings that were too big and causing localized flooding.
StillerBoy
Master of Distillation
Posts: 3387
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 6:27 pm
Location: Ontario

Re: Structured Packing

Post by StillerBoy »

Stonecutter wrote: Sun Oct 02, 2022 1:49 pm So which is it? Power usage and takeoff rate or space between packing?
I can see being inexperience can cause one to question.. time will develop experience, then it will all come together..

Mars
" I know quite certainly that I myself have no special talent. Curiosity, Obsession and dogged endurance, combined with self-criticism, have brought me to my knowledge and understanding "

– Albert Einstein
User avatar
Salt Must Flow
Distiller
Posts: 1921
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2022 2:06 pm
Location: Wuhan China (Novel Coronavirus Laboratory)

Re: Structured Packing

Post by Salt Must Flow »

I'd say, unless someone has tried it and reports back then it's all just speculation. Doesn't that make sense? Even if one person tried it, it's just anecdotal evidence. Considering the cost of structured packing, I'd just use Lava Rock and/or make my own SPP like StillerBoy said.

Who knows ... maybe some company will start up and make laser sintered 3D printed structured packing out of stainless and copper for a reasonable price with performance data to back it up. Wouldn't that be cool.
StillerBoy
Master of Distillation
Posts: 3387
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 6:27 pm
Location: Ontario

Re: Structured Packing

Post by StillerBoy »

shadylane wrote: Sun Oct 02, 2022 2:34 pm I disagree about the bands and tabs being useless.
Once upon a time folks were using centering rings to do the same job.
But everyone was using rings that were too big and causing localized flooding.
Yeah they were ideas from inexperienced hobbyist with no consideration, and over time the idea fell by the roadway, but there are still a few inexperienced who belief they do good..

Any attempt at making the returning distillate to travel down the center by using tabs or centering rings, no matter what size used, is a total waste of effort..

Distillate will take the easiest path down, and centering ring just disrupt for a few mm only and create some lost of performance.. and the other reason is that boiler and column are never truly level, and the distillate will always travel to the off angle side.. something that is never talked about, being on level went refluxing..

Mars
" I know quite certainly that I myself have no special talent. Curiosity, Obsession and dogged endurance, combined with self-criticism, have brought me to my knowledge and understanding "

– Albert Einstein
User avatar
Stonecutter
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 1911
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2021 2:40 pm
Location: Somewhere within the Milkyway

Re: Structured Packing

Post by Stonecutter »

StillerBoy wrote: Sun Oct 02, 2022 5:02 pm
Stonecutter wrote: Sun Oct 02, 2022 1:49 pm So which is it? Power usage and takeoff rate or space between packing?
I can see being inexperience can cause one to question.. time will develop experience, then it will all come together..

Mars
:lol:
Oh I see.

Well, I’m glad it makes so much sense to you StillerBoy. Maybe one day, I’ll be so knowledgeable that I’ll be able to chew my food twice just like you can. Then it will ALL come together.
Freedom had been hunted round the globe; reason was considered as rebellion; and the slavery of fear had made men afraid to think. But such is the irresistible nature of truth, that all it asks, and all it wants, is the liberty of appearing.
-Thomas Paine
User avatar
Salt Must Flow
Distiller
Posts: 1921
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2022 2:06 pm
Location: Wuhan China (Novel Coronavirus Laboratory)

Re: Structured Packing

Post by Salt Must Flow »

StillerBoy wrote: Sun Oct 02, 2022 5:30 pm
shadylane wrote: Sun Oct 02, 2022 2:34 pm I disagree about the bands and tabs being useless.
Once upon a time folks were using centering rings to do the same job.
But everyone was using rings that were too big and causing localized flooding.
Yeah they were ideas from inexperienced hobbyist with no consideration, and over time the idea fell by the roadway, but there are still a few inexperienced who belief they do good..

Any attempt at making the returning distillate to travel down the center by using tabs or centering rings, no matter what size used, is a total waste of effort..

Distillate will take the easiest path down, and centering ring just disrupt for a few mm only and create some lost of performance.. and the other reason is that boiler and column are never truly level, and the distillate will always travel to the off angle side.. something that is never talked about, being on level went refluxing..

Mars
I don't think the vast majority of home distillers uses multiple centering rings throughout their column these days. I personally use ONE just above my sight glass ONLY to keep the reflux falling through the center of my sight glass rather than it flowing against the glass. Flowing against the glass annoys the piss out of me. I want to see it falling through the center. Rather than just a reducing collar, I cut it and bent every petal at an opposite angle in attempt to reduce vapor restriction.

Centering Plate.jpg

As far as the the column being perfectly level, there was a thread here within a couple years ago where a guy deliberately tilted his column way off level and claimed to find no difference in performance. I still use a bubble level when I set up mine though. Why not right? I'll look for that link, but I can't find it right now.
Last edited by Salt Must Flow on Sun Oct 02, 2022 5:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Stonecutter
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 1911
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2021 2:40 pm
Location: Somewhere within the Milkyway

Re: Structured Packing

Post by Stonecutter »

I believe that was a Yummyrum experiment SMF
Freedom had been hunted round the globe; reason was considered as rebellion; and the slavery of fear had made men afraid to think. But such is the irresistible nature of truth, that all it asks, and all it wants, is the liberty of appearing.
-Thomas Paine
User avatar
Salt Must Flow
Distiller
Posts: 1921
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2022 2:06 pm
Location: Wuhan China (Novel Coronavirus Laboratory)

Re: Structured Packing

Post by Salt Must Flow »

Stonecutter wrote: Sun Oct 02, 2022 5:48 pm I believe that was a Yummyrum experiment SMF
Yeah I tried to find it, but can't find it right now.
User avatar
Yummyrum
Global moderator
Posts: 7653
Joined: Sat Jul 06, 2013 2:23 am
Location: Fraser Coast QLD Aussie

Re: Structured Packing

Post by Yummyrum »

Salt Must Flow wrote: Sun Oct 02, 2022 5:51 pm
Stonecutter wrote: Sun Oct 02, 2022 5:48 pm I believe that was a Yummyrum experiment SMF
Yeah I tried to find it, but can't find it right now.
This
viewtopic.php?p=7683367#p7683367
User avatar
Stonecutter
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 1911
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2021 2:40 pm
Location: Somewhere within the Milkyway

Re: Structured Packing

Post by Stonecutter »

StillerBoy wrote: Sat Oct 01, 2022 10:22 am I'm of the view there's to much open space, plus the band with the tabs really serve nothing, as the distillate will just follow the inside the band instead of the column.. waste of time and funds compared to some other packing doing a good job for the hobbyist..

Packing need to have the least amount of open space between the them for it to work at maximum efficient..

Mars

I know I’m ignorant and inexperienced but I wasn’t sure what this meant either.

Also,
StillerBoy wrote: Sun Oct 02, 2022 5:30 pm
Distillate will take the easiest path down, and centering ring just disrupt for a few mm only and create some lost of performance.. and the other reason is that boiler and column are never truly level, and the distillate will always travel to the off angle side.. something that is never talked about, being on level went refluxing..

Mars
StillerBoy wrote: Sun Oct 02, 2022 1:39 pm Do or take the time to do such, and determine for one self,

Mars
I’m really trying to follow along Mars. I’m very new to the hobby and I know you’ve been a member here for quite a while. Honestly, to me this reflux science seems rather complex and that there are still plenty of mediums to be experimented with. I’m not saying it will but, if the Structured Packing that the OP talked about can positively contribute to the wealth of knowledge within this forum it will only make it that much easier for the individual hobbyists to perfect their craft. Just because somebody can achieve 95% doesn’t mean they know the why. The contributions of past members can give the weekend warrior a false sense of understanding. I know I’m guilty of it.
Freedom had been hunted round the globe; reason was considered as rebellion; and the slavery of fear had made men afraid to think. But such is the irresistible nature of truth, that all it asks, and all it wants, is the liberty of appearing.
-Thomas Paine
eljefe3126
Novice
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2022 8:41 pm

Re: Structured Packing

Post by eljefe3126 »

I've now found a copy of Krell's Handbook of Laboratory Distillation (1982 edition). Figure 345, which has been reproduced in this forum several times, shows a HETP for SPP ranging from about 0.5 cm to about 3 cm. He also writes,
Helices of thin wire (Grosse-Oetringhaus) have an extremely high efficiencv. The author's experience shows that they can also deal with high loads. If such helices are to be resistant to corrosion they should he made of stainless steel (e.g. 18:8): furthermore, their manufacture to a constant length in sizes smaller than 2 mm is difficult. Their price is consequently high. On the other hand the efficiency of the small sizes (1.3-2 mm) is exceptional; an HETP of 1.0-1.6 cm can be obtained with them. The latter sizes are made of 0.15 -0.2 mm wire. For one litre of column space the number of rings required is approximately as follows:

2 mm 115,OOO
4 mm 12,600
20 mm 100

It was an obvious step also to make such helices of glass (Fenske helices). The writer carried out some tests on closely-wound glass spirals of 4~4x0.3 and 7 x 7 x 0.3 nun at atmospheric pressure with benzene-CCl, mixture and obtained the results shown in Table 71. They are available as both single and multi-turn helices.
Table 71 shows between 26 and 60 theoretical stages in a 1-meter column, which works out to an HETP of between 1.7 cm to 3.8 cm.

In the photo at the top of this thread, the two bundles of structured packing are made by Sulzer, and they advertise HETP of 3-10 cm for size DX (the big bundle) and 2-8 cm for size EX (the small bundle). The advantage of the structured packing is that it scales up without the HETP increasing, unlike most random packings. I suppose that might be of interest if you are planning on going toe-to-toe with Jack Daniels or Smirnov, but probably not at our scale.

I included the second paragraph about the glass helices because he calls them Fenske helices, and that seems to be what the industry calls our metal SPP. I can investigate what suppliers of will quote for "Fenske helices" if there is any interest.
StillerBoy
Master of Distillation
Posts: 3387
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 6:27 pm
Location: Ontario

Re: Structured Packing

Post by StillerBoy »

Unfortunately, valuable information such as column size and length are not mention in the copied..

So what was the column size that these Helices of thin wire used in.. as packing size efficiency is directly related to column size..

Mars
" I know quite certainly that I myself have no special talent. Curiosity, Obsession and dogged endurance, combined with self-criticism, have brought me to my knowledge and understanding "

– Albert Einstein
User avatar
Windy City
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 1177
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:52 pm
Location: Chicagoland

Re: Structured Packing

Post by Windy City »

eljefe3126 wrote: Sat Oct 01, 2022 7:45 am In the chemical industry, this is what they call structured packing. It's layers of metal gauze (or plate), crimped into v-shaped corrugations at an angle to vertical of 45-60 degrees. Then each layer is placed back-to-back with the previous layer, so that droplets can bounce left or right as they descend like pinballs in a pachinko machine. The round bands have tabs that intercept droplets clinging to the wall of the column and redirect them to the interior where the packing is.

Has anyone here experimented with this stuff? It seems like it would be easy to make if one just had a means of corrugating strips of metal gauze.

image.png
Do they offer this in 4” and any idea how much it is??
The liver is evil and must be punished
Cranky"s spoon feeding for new and novice distillers
http://homedistiller.org/forum/viewtopi ... 15&t=52975
User avatar
bunny
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 398
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2020 8:28 am

Re: Structured Packing

Post by bunny »

eljefe3126
Novice
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2022 8:41 pm

Re: Structured Packing

Post by eljefe3126 »

StillerBoy wrote: Tue Oct 04, 2022 1:23 pm Unfortunately, valuable information such as column size and length are not mention in the copied..

So what was the column size that these Helices of thin wire used in.. as packing size efficiency is directly related to column size..
Figure 345, which has appeared in this forum, is for a column of 24 mm diameter and 0.5 meters tall. Infinite reflux ratio.

And I see that I misread the title for Figure 351 and wrongly assumed that was Table 71. So, Figure 351 is for little cylinders (he calls them "rings") of bronze gauze, 3mm x 3mm. That's what has 26-60 stages per meter (HETP = 1.7-3.8 cm). Data was gathered in a 100 mm x 1 meter column.

Table 71 is for the glass "Fenske helices". They measured HETP = 5.2 - 6.1 cm for 4 mm spirals, and HETP = 5.4 - 8.0 cm for 7 mm spirals. Column was 30 mm diameter x 0.92 meters tall.

Sadly, no column size data for the wire "Fenske helices".
User avatar
workpress
Novice
Posts: 80
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 5:25 pm
Location: Kingsville

Re: Structured Packing

Post by workpress »

Having just glanced into this discussion if one wanted to make their own crimped material you could simply order a paint tube crimping tool and I assume it would do the job quite well

workpress
image.png
image.png (46.93 KiB) Viewed 656 times
tiramisu
Swill Maker
Posts: 489
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2018 3:03 pm

Re: Structured Packing

Post by tiramisu »

Interesting thread. With metal 3d printing offering copper and stainless options I expect you could design some pretty darn impressive reflux packing ... but it doesn't seem necessary and would probably be prohibitively expensive. Cool Enginerding though.
Post Reply