Two step maturation process experiment
Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2024 2:43 pm
Hi, I make whiskey at home, and whilst I do enjoy drinking the new make, I’m mostly interested in producing an aged product.
I’ve tried glass with chips, dominos and spirals and for the most part I don’t feel like it results in a final product that I want to drink. Having said that one of my batches that rested on a combination of lightly toasted seasoned oak dominos + Jack Daniel’s barrel chips for about 2 years was drinkable. I also have a number of Badmo barrels, the oldest of which I filled in August ’22 (about 19 months ago at this point) and I feel like the product in the Badmos is streets ahead of the product in glass - albeit not quite ready to drink yet. I keep my Badmo barrels in an uninsulated ceiling cavity to take advantage of the big daily temperature swings in helping the maturation process along. My assumption is that the temperature swings exaggerate the pressure differential between the inside of the barrel and the environment, thus accelerating both extraction and gas turnover (and oxygenation) in the barrel via the porous barrel head. I also assume that the high temperatures on sunny days speed up the chemical reactions taking place in the barrel. So I’m happy with the progress of my barrelled product. However, I have a limited number of Badmos, so they represent the key constraint in my production system. To compensate I’m also maturing product in beer kegs on various oak pieces including light and medium toasted dominoes, barrel chips & toasted, charred staves from Badmo. My intention is that this part forms the 1st step in a 2 part process, which I consider to be the “extraction” step. The idea being that when a Badmo barrel becomes free I’ll decanted from one of the kegs into the now-second-use Badmo barrel for an “oxygenation” step of probably 12-24 months, which will be the second step in the process. I have a relatively high level of confidence in this plan, but I’m also considering variation of step 1 to help speed the whole process along. Here’s what I’m planning.
Each keg is 19l, currently my kegs have approximately 18l of product (including the oak) and 1l of headspace. When I taste the product from the kegs I’m pretty happy with the flavour from the extraction but can tell that the effects of oxygen (and time) are lagging. I have a hypothesis that if I can induce evaporation through the exchange of air in the keg at a rate similar to that experienced in full sized barrels, that by proxy, I’ll achieve at least some of the benefits of oxidation/micro-oxidisation in the keg. Working on the assumption that standard oak barrels lose somewhere in the region of 2-5% of their volume per annum via evaporation (with humidity determining whether more ethanol or more water is lost in the process).
So I’m planing on initially targeting at 1.5ml daily rate of evaporation for my kegs, which approximates the full size barrel evaporation when scaled. The mechanism for this is to be by forcing compressed air (clean air via a hand pump) through the dip tube (and possibly through an aeration stone attached to the dip tube). I’d initially do this daily and would release the pressure via the PRV each day before adding a perhaps a litre or so of air (to begin with). The way I’d dial in to my evaporation target is by weighing the keg weekly, looking for a drop of approximately 10.5 grams per week and adjusting the air turnover around that target. Prior to staring this I’ll take about a litre of product out of the keg so that I can conduct periodic side-by-side tasting to see whether or not my hypothesis is proving out.
Keen to know if anyone has done similar experiments or whether someone can spot flaws in the rationale underpinning this experiment.
I’ve tried glass with chips, dominos and spirals and for the most part I don’t feel like it results in a final product that I want to drink. Having said that one of my batches that rested on a combination of lightly toasted seasoned oak dominos + Jack Daniel’s barrel chips for about 2 years was drinkable. I also have a number of Badmo barrels, the oldest of which I filled in August ’22 (about 19 months ago at this point) and I feel like the product in the Badmos is streets ahead of the product in glass - albeit not quite ready to drink yet. I keep my Badmo barrels in an uninsulated ceiling cavity to take advantage of the big daily temperature swings in helping the maturation process along. My assumption is that the temperature swings exaggerate the pressure differential between the inside of the barrel and the environment, thus accelerating both extraction and gas turnover (and oxygenation) in the barrel via the porous barrel head. I also assume that the high temperatures on sunny days speed up the chemical reactions taking place in the barrel. So I’m happy with the progress of my barrelled product. However, I have a limited number of Badmos, so they represent the key constraint in my production system. To compensate I’m also maturing product in beer kegs on various oak pieces including light and medium toasted dominoes, barrel chips & toasted, charred staves from Badmo. My intention is that this part forms the 1st step in a 2 part process, which I consider to be the “extraction” step. The idea being that when a Badmo barrel becomes free I’ll decanted from one of the kegs into the now-second-use Badmo barrel for an “oxygenation” step of probably 12-24 months, which will be the second step in the process. I have a relatively high level of confidence in this plan, but I’m also considering variation of step 1 to help speed the whole process along. Here’s what I’m planning.
Each keg is 19l, currently my kegs have approximately 18l of product (including the oak) and 1l of headspace. When I taste the product from the kegs I’m pretty happy with the flavour from the extraction but can tell that the effects of oxygen (and time) are lagging. I have a hypothesis that if I can induce evaporation through the exchange of air in the keg at a rate similar to that experienced in full sized barrels, that by proxy, I’ll achieve at least some of the benefits of oxidation/micro-oxidisation in the keg. Working on the assumption that standard oak barrels lose somewhere in the region of 2-5% of their volume per annum via evaporation (with humidity determining whether more ethanol or more water is lost in the process).
So I’m planing on initially targeting at 1.5ml daily rate of evaporation for my kegs, which approximates the full size barrel evaporation when scaled. The mechanism for this is to be by forcing compressed air (clean air via a hand pump) through the dip tube (and possibly through an aeration stone attached to the dip tube). I’d initially do this daily and would release the pressure via the PRV each day before adding a perhaps a litre or so of air (to begin with). The way I’d dial in to my evaporation target is by weighing the keg weekly, looking for a drop of approximately 10.5 grams per week and adjusting the air turnover around that target. Prior to staring this I’ll take about a litre of product out of the keg so that I can conduct periodic side-by-side tasting to see whether or not my hypothesis is proving out.
Keen to know if anyone has done similar experiments or whether someone can spot flaws in the rationale underpinning this experiment.