Ultrasonic Lab Trials
Moderator: Site Moderator
Re: Ultrasonic Lab Trials
I have not done anything with the actual fermentation but have experimented a lot with infusion of different flavors and using wood sticks and chips for flavor enhancement with positive results.
Re: Ultrasonic Lab Trials
I think I will experiment with an cheap ultrasonic fog maker.
Something like this 12v transducer on ebay:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Ultrasonic-Mist ... 58b2fec40a" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
Something like this 12v transducer on ebay:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Ultrasonic-Mist ... 58b2fec40a" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
Last edited by francis on Sat Jun 13, 2015 1:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Goodbye.
Re: Ultrasonic Lab Trials
The pictures and graphs indicate that, but they don't say what the time period of the full cycle is, unless I missed it.RandyMarshCT wrote:francis, this is VERY interesting! The 20% duty cycle seems to be the threshold.
Goodbye.
- humbledore
- Trainee
- Posts: 898
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 1:12 pm
- Location: The third coast
Re: Ultrasonic Lab Trials
HDPE chemical resistance charts: https://www.thermoscientific.com/conten ... 20480~.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
Goodbye.
- Odin
- Master of Distillation
- Posts: 6844
- Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:20 am
- Location: Three feet below sea level
Re: Ultrasonic Lab Trials
I rather see you buy something out of SS all the way. Like this:
http://www.ultrasoonreiniger.com/emag-emmi-30hc.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
Regards, Odin.
http://www.ultrasoonreiniger.com/emag-emmi-30hc.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
Regards, Odin.
"Great art is created only through diligent and painstaking effort to perfect and polish oneself." by Buddhist filosofer Daisaku Ikeda.
Re: Ultrasonic Lab Trials
You can buy them a lot cheaper on ebay below is a 1/2 gallon + (2L) similar to mine for $82.00, you can also get a 6L for $100.00 more.Odin wrote:I rather see you buy something out of SS all the way. Like this:
http://www.ultrasoonreiniger.com/emag-emmi-30hc.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
Regards, Odin.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Stainless-Steel ... 0637021944" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
Re: Ultrasonic Lab Trials
Bushman wrote:You can buy them a lot cheaper on ebay below is a 1/2 gallon + (2L) similar to mine for $82.00, you can also get a 6L for $100.00 more.Odin wrote:I rather see you buy something out of SS all the way. Like this:
http://www.ultrasoonreiniger.com/emag-emmi-30hc.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
Regards, Odin.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Stainless-Steel ... 0637021944" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
Nice. Thanks for the link. Ok you guys convinced me the ultrasonic fogger would not really work (not 20W per liter). I'll get a 2L ultrasonic cleaner. How long do you treat it for? I notice most of these units have a 30 min timer.
Goodbye.
Re: Ultrasonic Lab Trials
I give it 3 10 minute baths with a 15-20 min rest in between.
- Odin
- Master of Distillation
- Posts: 6844
- Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:20 am
- Location: Three feet below sea level
Re: Ultrasonic Lab Trials
Same procedure here. Adding oxygen even helps improve results.
Odin.
Odin.
"Great art is created only through diligent and painstaking effort to perfect and polish oneself." by Buddhist filosofer Daisaku Ikeda.
Re: Ultrasonic Lab Trials
Odin wrote:Same procedure here. Adding oxygen even helps improve results.
Odin.
Has anyone here tried adding a bit of hydrogen peroxide to accelerate aging ?
Goodbye.
- kiwi Bruce
- Distiller
- Posts: 2400
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:38 pm
- Location: Transplanted Kiwi living in the States
Re: Ultrasonic Lab Trials
It's a brave new world boys and girls. I think we are seeing a new window of opportunity opening before our eyes. A new class of Beijing capitalists is emerging, with a desire for western cigarettes and a thirst Western spirits, and it's a market that is only going to get bigger. Commercially available, fast maturation for the spirits industry is the obvious answer. It's exciting to see everyone's input and the progression of ideas. I hope some of you think of taking this into the commercial arena, after all, there is a dragon to feed! Kiwi Bruce
(It breaks my heart, but) I've finally decided my future lies
Beyond the yellow brick road...from Elton John
Beyond the yellow brick road...from Elton John
Re: Ultrasonic Lab Trials
I've used an airstone on a liter of heads that had a strong smell, of what I assumed was acetone. But it was very probably ethyl acetate. After bubbling for a day in a cool garage volume down by 5% and acetone smell greatly reduced, but still detectable. I may try ozone, as I have an ozone bubbler. This came off a turbo wash, before I knew any better.
Goodbye.
Re: Ultrasonic Lab Trials
5% seems like a lot. It might be that introducing air into the distillate was causing the production of ethyl acetate at the same time that it was airing some of it out. A possible solution would be to raise the pH to counter the production of ethyl acetate but the drawback would be that you would loose some/many of the esters wanted in a flavored distillate, if that is what you are after.francis wrote:I've used an airstone on a liter of heads that had a strong smell, of what I assumed was acetone. But it was very probably ethyl acetate. After bubbling for a day in a cool garage volume down by 5% and acetone smell greatly reduced, but still detectable.
This is something that I have wanted to try but don't have the generator. The same problem/solution above would come into play.I may try ozone, as I have an ozone bubbler.
Re: Ultrasonic Lab Trials
Yes, it's introducing a ton of air into the distillate I did try sodium bicarbonate, after my stripping run, not on the jar of the second pass distillate, which was 80%.Bagasso wrote: 5% seems like a lot. It might be that introducing air into the distillate was causing the production of ethyl acetate at the same time that it was airing some of it out. A possible solution would be to raise the pH to counter the production of ethyl acetate but the drawback would be that you would loose some/many of the esters wanted in a flavored distillate, if that is what you are after.
This is something that I have wanted to try but don't have the generator. The same problem/solution above would come into play.
Ozone bubblers are < $20 on ebay or ali express. I use one for treating sprouts when they are done:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/200mg-hr-Fruits ... 3cea903948" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
http://www.aliexpress.com/item/Free-Shi ... 30415.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
Goodbye.
Re: Ultrasonic Lab Trials
Any bicarb used in low wines wouldn't come over on the spirit run.francis wrote:Yes, it's introducing a ton of air into the distillate I did try sodium bicarbonate, after my stripping run, not on the jar of the second pass distillate, which was 80%.
Thanks, I have seen them but since I don't really have any other use for one I am on the lookout for positive results before deciding.Ozone bubblers are < $20 on ebay or ali express.
Re: Ultrasonic Lab Trials
Well I'll be dammed . . . it really works !
I did order a 2L SS unit, but in the meantime I looked for my ultrasonic fogger. But could not find it.
But I did find an ultrasonic mister / humidifier, that you screw on to a water bottle and plugs into a USB port. It outputs 2W.
I just set the cap on the ground and set a mason jar of some fresh distillate with some fruit from a can on it.
I had two jars, filled each to the same level (1/3) with lychees and syrup from a can, and the rest the fresh distillate. Same volume for both jars.
So one jar on the mister and one off. Since it's only 2W, I let it run for 24 hours.
I can smell low concentrations of ethyl acetate (acetone smell) easily.
The jar on the mister is noticeably clearer (interesting because you would expect vibration to maintain turbidity).
The acetone smell is very faint. It's very smooth, sweet tasting.
The jar off the mister is more cloudy and still has sharp acetone smell.
Temperature is the same, ambient 20C. The difference in smell is very noticeable after 24 hours.
Now trying hydrogen peroxide (1/4 tsp of 3% hydrogen peroxide in the quart mason jar of alcohol) plus the cap mister . . .
I did order a 2L SS unit, but in the meantime I looked for my ultrasonic fogger. But could not find it.
But I did find an ultrasonic mister / humidifier, that you screw on to a water bottle and plugs into a USB port. It outputs 2W.
I just set the cap on the ground and set a mason jar of some fresh distillate with some fruit from a can on it.
I had two jars, filled each to the same level (1/3) with lychees and syrup from a can, and the rest the fresh distillate. Same volume for both jars.
So one jar on the mister and one off. Since it's only 2W, I let it run for 24 hours.
I can smell low concentrations of ethyl acetate (acetone smell) easily.
The jar on the mister is noticeably clearer (interesting because you would expect vibration to maintain turbidity).
The acetone smell is very faint. It's very smooth, sweet tasting.
The jar off the mister is more cloudy and still has sharp acetone smell.
Temperature is the same, ambient 20C. The difference in smell is very noticeable after 24 hours.
Now trying hydrogen peroxide (1/4 tsp of 3% hydrogen peroxide in the quart mason jar of alcohol) plus the cap mister . . .
Goodbye.
Re: Ultrasonic Lab Trials
You can make an ultrasound treatment device for about half the price of the ones on ebay.
I don't need the heater. I want to treat the distillate at room temperature or below for a longer time.
So I just need a driver board and a transducer. Epoxy the transducer to the bottom of a thin stainless steel mixing bowl from the dollar store and off you go.
100W 40kHz power driver: http://www.ebay.com/itm/100W-40KHz-Ultr ... 2800eb9d89" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
60W 40kHz transducer: http://www.ebay.com/itm/1-60W-40KHz-Ult ... 3aaa187e00" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
I don't need the heater. I want to treat the distillate at room temperature or below for a longer time.
So I just need a driver board and a transducer. Epoxy the transducer to the bottom of a thin stainless steel mixing bowl from the dollar store and off you go.
100W 40kHz power driver: http://www.ebay.com/itm/100W-40KHz-Ultr ... 2800eb9d89" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
60W 40kHz transducer: http://www.ebay.com/itm/1-60W-40KHz-Ult ... 3aaa187e00" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
Goodbye.
- freshwaterjellyfish
- Swill Maker
- Posts: 216
- Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 2:46 pm
- Location: Ontario CANADA
Re: Ultrasonic Lab Trials
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1EH6atYydBc" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
Man goes to doctor. Says he's depressed , feels alone in a cruel world. Doctor says, "Treatments simple. The great clown Pagliacci is in town tonight. That should pick you up." Man bursts into tears."But doctor. I am Pagliacci."
Re: Ultrasonic Lab Trials
Am I missing something?
From the results the microwaved material appears to be superior.
Removal of all ethyl acetate without concentrating the higher alcohols, presumably by not evaporating as much ethanol.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave_chemistry" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
Sometimes use this at work, can get reactions to occur at fairly low temperatures compared to conventional heating.
From the results the microwaved material appears to be superior.
Removal of all ethyl acetate without concentrating the higher alcohols, presumably by not evaporating as much ethanol.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave_chemistry" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
Sometimes use this at work, can get reactions to occur at fairly low temperatures compared to conventional heating.
Re: Ultrasonic Lab Trials
I found this: MICROWAVE CHEMISTRY — AN APPROACH TO THE ASSESSMENT OF CHEMICAL REACTION HAZARDSjohnnyv wrote:Sometimes use this at work, can get reactions to occur at fairly low temperatures compared to conventional heating.
Seems like things shift quite a bit in a MW. On page 6 there is an interesting table that shows that under something they call microwave conditions things have the following boiling points:
Solvent °C Water 104 Dimethylformamide 170 Acetonitrile 107 Methanol 84 Ethanol 103 Acetone 81 Dichloromethane 55 Tetrahydrofuran 81 Ethyl acetate 95 Propan-2-ol 100
Re: Ultrasonic Lab Trials
That is a good paper!
Household microwaves are at a frequency that penetrates water, less efficient but used so food is heated more evenly rather than just heating on the outside.
It is possible that some of these polar solvents are absorbing the energy more easily and getting preferentially heated.
Also water has a very high specific heat compared to most solvents, usually around twice the energy required to raise its temperature.
Household microwaves are at a frequency that penetrates water, less efficient but used so food is heated more evenly rather than just heating on the outside.
It is possible that some of these polar solvents are absorbing the energy more easily and getting preferentially heated.
Also water has a very high specific heat compared to most solvents, usually around twice the energy required to raise its temperature.
Re: Ultrasonic Lab Trials
I had just given it a quick glance and that table jumped out at me. Looking at the paper slowly I see that it has very limited application to distilling. Seems like they are focusing on single solvents in a microwave.johnnyv wrote:It is possible that some of these polar solvents are absorbing the energy more easily and getting preferentially heated.
Also water has a very high specific heat compared to most solvents, usually around twice the energy required to raise its temperature.
Still the most significant bit is the shift in boiling point for ethanol from 79°C to 103°C. While methanol, acetone and ethyl acetate shift to 84°C, 81°C and 95°C respectively. Even propan-2-ol sneaks in under ethanol at 100°C. So in theory you should be able to drive off these 4 congeners (maybe even others that just were not on that list) a lot easier due to the shifts in BPs.
The one thing that is of concern, and it is the reason the table of BPs is in there, is superheating.
Say you take a liter of low wines and heat in a MW to 102°C. In theory you will have gotten rid of a fair amount of the congeners mentioned above but as soon as you disturb or add something to the liquid both the water and the ethanol are going to want to boil off instantly.
I took 125ml of wine and heated up to around 92°C and when I dropped my thermometer probe in I got a bit of a surge from the wine. Nothing dangerous (probably because it wasn't to far over the bp of etho and still below water) but it was still a reminder of what to take into consideration.
Might look further into it and start a thread instead of further derailing this one.
Last edited by Bagasso on Wed Apr 12, 2017 5:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Ultrasonic Lab Trials
As a member who distress ages azeotrope using hot water as opposed to the microwave method, I'm following this thread very keenly.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk