And 13% love? Or is that lbs in the mash?MichiganCornhusker wrote: I'm running one wheated 50/25/12 Corn/Wheat/Barley...

Moderator: Site Moderator
And 13% love? Or is that lbs in the mash?MichiganCornhusker wrote: I'm running one wheated 50/25/12 Corn/Wheat/Barley...
Ratios, but would work as #/batch too.Jimbo wrote:And 13% love? Or is that lbs in the mash?
I believe it's a matter of taste. I've found using a new barrel for bourbon is going to offer the best product. I think that using a barrel a second time works, but not near as well as a new barrel. The liquor has to sit in the barrel much longer the second time around, perhaps as long as two years versus a single year in a new barrel and in my opinion the flavor isn't as smooth and full bodied as a bourbon from a new barrel. Leaving your bourbon in the bottle for another year new or used barrel emphasizes that smoothness and flavor.MoonBreath wrote:So it seems most general consensuses are rite ..Used barrels with added wood adjunct is the way to go...
Sure, its always a matter of taste. But my findings here, which were surprising and compelled me to write the post was that the used barrel with added used wood produced a whiskey that was far smoother and far more full bodied than the new barrel, which was predictable and oaky. To be fair the used barrel whiskey sat twice as long in the barrel at 2 years, and the new barrel itself was of dubious quality from barrelsonline. The test is worth repeating, and will be with a better new barrel.DFitz wrote:I believe it's a matter of taste. I've found using a new barrel for bourbon is going to offer the best product. I think that using a barrel a second time works, but not near as well as a new barrel. The liquor has to sit in the barrel much longer the second time around, perhaps as long as two years versus a single year in a new barrel and in my opinion the flavor isn't as smooth and full bodied as a bourbon from a new barrel. Leaving your bourbon in the bottle for another year new or used barrel emphasizes that smoothness and flavor.MoonBreath wrote:So it seems most general consensuses are rite ..Used barrels with added wood adjunct is the way to go...
You say your sticks were used once. What did you soak them in before stuffing them in the barrel?Jimbo wrote: I think the key to the rich deep flavors was all the sticks I stuffed in there, ~20, cut from Jack staves and recharred. All the wood being used once, the fresh wood astringency was washed away and it was just a slow caramelization over 2 years.
buflowing wrote:I don't consider sticks cut from used barrel staves as being used sticks. I consider them half used, half new. The inner surface is certainly used, and the inner half of the side surfaces are partly used. The outer surface and outer half of the sides I consider unused.
I do similar with french oak barrel sticks before I use them with sherry for Malt Whisky.buflowing wrote:A trick I like to use for all my new sticks is to boil in water for 5 minutes before use. I toast before and char after. I don't recall who first suggested this, but I find it helpful to remove some of the tannins and "roughness".
looks like someone's done his homework.Jimbo wrote: I have a bottle of Jim Beam Black thats 8 years old and still has a hell of a spank. Knob creek is 9 years old and has that same fresh wood varnish character, but somehow balances this wood resin varnish thing with smoothness and incredible drinkability.