I have always put the void at the bottom, I read somewhere that the plates at the top of the column will enhance the flavor profile.Mr.Spooky wrote:should the "void" be in the lower part,, or in the upper part
OD
Moderator: Site Moderator
I have always put the void at the bottom, I read somewhere that the plates at the top of the column will enhance the flavor profile.Mr.Spooky wrote:should the "void" be in the lower part,, or in the upper part
got any plans set in stone Austin?Austin Nichols wrote:
Sort of,Mr.Spooky wrote:got any plans set in stone Austin?Austin Nichols wrote:
spooky
I think your right Mr Spooky.Mr.Spooky wrote:this is good dialect,,,, maby the rest of the conversation should be carried over to "Flute Talk"
spooky
Erichimedes wrote:It doesn't quite work that way with a j-trap. For that concept to work, you'd have to plug the bottom end of the J. Let's say you drilled those two holes. There's equal pressure on the end of the J and on the drain holes; they would just drain out. A perforated plate holds liquid because of the difference in pressure between the top of the plate and the bottom of the plate. A J-trap holds liquid because it's shaped like a cup. You can't really mix those two concepts(at least not in this way).EscarpmentDew wrote:...drilling one or two 1/16" holes into the bottom of the j-trap would be a benefit because it would allow proper drainage once the vapour flow ceases but would most likely hold liquid in the j-trap as long as there is a vapour pressure just as a normal perforated plate will.
Not to shoot anyone down, I just wanted to point that out before any holes got drilled!
Prairiepiss wrote:I would disagree with you in this situation. You are talking about a normal J trap as it is intended to be used in a normal application. Where you do not have two aposing forces. In this situation you have fluid draining from the plate above so you have flow. And you have vapor pressure coming up from the boiler. If the holes in the plate above can hold fluid during a run. So will a hole in the bottom of a J trap. You have to consider the J trap in operation. And when its shut off yes it will drain. That's the purpose of putting it there. So the fluid will drain back to the boiler. For easy cleanup.
Erichimedes wrote:It's really not easy to prove it one way or the other on an internet forum For pressure to be able to hold liquid in the j-trap, it would have to be pushing up on those holes. For it to push on the holes, there has to be less pressure on one side of the holes(the inside of the j-trap) than on the other side(the inside of the pressurized chamber). With the end of the j-trap open, both sides of the holes are at the same pressure, giving no holding power. If you close it, however, the pressure then wants to go in those small holes because it's the path OUT! The initial liquid to come down into the trap would just drain out.
I suppose this is sort of a dumb argument. Sorry, I just wanted to explain myself better.
Prairiepiss wrote:Is it dumb? You got me thinking. But I am thinking the opposite of you. Now I am wondering if the drain hole wouldn't bubble like the holes in the plate. And its real easy to prove. As soon as someone who has J traps and sightglasses drills a hole for a drain. Then it can be seen whether it holds or drains during a run.
Sorry Condensificator for the hijacking.
EscarpmentDew wrote:Please tell me I haven't ruined anyone's still by my suggestion! Erichemedes, you have me reconsidering the ease of my idea, but I am not convinced it isn't managable. I understand your point, but I am grappling with your argument because the net force from the downward pressure of the liquid build-up and the upward force from the vapour pressure is not obvious to me. I am thinking at this point that there would not need to be very much vapour pressure if the j-trap only had a short pipe leading up; that is, only long enough to remove a direct vapour path and that is not long at all. All the same, thanks for speaking up because I was starting to feel way to cocky . Perhaps what you have brought to everyone's attention is an obstacle to be overcome, or perhaps it is a reason to abandon the idea entirely. I am in no position to say yet . . .
coppercreature wrote:When I want to drain my J traps, I turn them upside down. Tiny holes and vapor pressure calculations be damned!
aqua vitae wrote:coppercreature wrote:When I want to drain my J traps, I turn them upside down. Tiny holes and vapor pressure calculations be damned!
Keep It Stupid Simple!
Cos that's the size needed to get a 3 metre coil of 3/8" tubing.Austin Nichols wrote: but why go with such a large product condenser?
Why not. At the top of the column with the temperature maintained at 78 degrees you are observing the alcohol distilling on the top plate. the lower plates closer to the boiler run at a hotter temperature which show the portion of wash distillation at a higher temperature, eg water. Why would you want to observe the wash which mainly consist of water distillingAustin Nichols wrote:I built my first with the sight glasses on the 1st, 3rd n 5th plate, why go for the top 3 plates with windows?
You can get this with a cleaning run, but it does not happen when you are distilling alcohol.prdbrissy wrote:I have a questionDoes every body get condensation on the inside of the sight glasses to the point you can't see inside?Is there something I can do to stop this?
Thanks OD. I had typed that reply but thought, hmmmmmmmmmmm, while I don't think there's a difference. maybe I'm mistaken. I chose the safe course and decided against thinking to myself, "OD willl take care of this" and you did.olddog wrote:Making cuts is a practice which applies to all distillation, not just specific to one type of still.OD