Page 1 of 4
VM Project
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 8:26 pm
by new_moonshiner
Re: VM Project
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 8:34 pm
by Husker
Ooooohhhh
, NICE eye candy for us stillers.
Hell, if someone complains about too big for dialup, pix like this might push them into upgrading to broadband
Re: VM Project
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 8:41 pm
by new_moonshiner
lol thanks for the kind words husker .. i just didn't want to do anything slow up things .. I will soon hopefully get to take couple of everything assembled in action ..
Re: VM Project
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 8:49 pm
by Hawke
Very nice work.
I see you added the slant plates for foreshot removal.
Re: VM Project
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 8:55 pm
by new_moonshiner
yes sir Mr. Hawke, I was trying to think who it was who suggested that ..I thought It was you but i wasn't 100 percent and I didnt want to offend anyone .. Im glad I took your advice .. it works like a dream ... thanks again for that .
Re: VM Project
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:05 pm
by Hawke
It wasn't my idea, but I remember it being discussed.
I might modify my Boka, and turn it into a simillar rig. Even though I'm concentrating on potstilling.
Re: VM Project
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:55 pm
by HookLine
Oooh, that's real nice. Good to see a man take pride in his work.
Re: VM Project
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 5:48 am
by plonker
Beautiful stuff.. wish my work was that good..
Its like... copper porn...
Re: VM Project
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:50 pm
by rad14701
Darn nice work there...
Re: VM Project
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:47 am
by Godstilla
That's some damn fine work NM! I hope the guy reworking my rig is half as talented as you are.
lol
Re: VM Project
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 8:21 am
by new_moonshiner
thanks for all the compliments guys .. its much appreciated especially coming from you guys ...
I will pass that along to the guy doing that work for ya Godstilla ....lol
Re: VM Project
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 10:23 am
by manu de hanoi
impressive
Re: VM Project
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 8:38 pm
by gtig
I swear to god I am not trolling... but what does VM stand for? I googled it first and found nothing... the only thing I can come up with is "Valve Modification"... or "vapor mast"... neither seem good enough to explain what this is.
That being asked... it looks dead sexy... what is the black stuff hiding all the pretty copper?
LOVE the case it goes in... really cool... in fact I see one of these in my future.
thanks.
Greg/GTIG
Re: VM Project
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 9:09 pm
by HookLine
VM = vapour management
LM = liquid management
CM = cooling management
PM = power management
Did you try using the site specific Google search? Link at the top of the page. Also see this thread.
http://homedistiller.org/forum/viewtopi ... 35&t=10331
Foreshot removal
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:56 pm
by ImaDKrook
Postby Hawke ยป Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:49 am
Very nice work.
I see you added the slant plates for foreshot removal.
Help me understand. In relation to the plates and valves.
Krook
Re: VM Project
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:35 pm
by new_moonshiner
With the gate valve in the closed position the slanted plates work just as a LM rig would with everything being taken off from the smaller (brass Valve) ..Im just using Harry' cross flow condenser idea (slight variation )..for the condenser..
The procedure in operating the rig is to use the LM (liquid management ) operation to remove the foreshots and heads which is collected from the smaller brass valve .. once they are removed , then you can close the valve and switch to the Vapor management side using the SS Gate valve
To remove to hearts which should not have any contamination from the fores and heads . the rig is still sending liquid down the packing during this time ( it overflows on the bottom plate because the valve is closed) and you open the gate to remove a percentage of the vapor which is condensed in the second (liebig) condenser ..
edit Oh yeah I almost forgot the black stuff hiding the copper is insulation under several rolls of electrical tape. not only does it insulate it protects from dents and bruises as well.
here is the adapter I use to connect to keg with also .
Double checking
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:40 pm
by ImaDKrook
[quote="new_moonshiner"]With the gate valve in the closed position the slanted plates work just as a LM rig would with everything being taken off from the smaller (brass Valve)
This I understand.
The procedure in operating the rig is to use the LM (liquid management ) operation to remove the foreshots and heads which is collected from the smaller brass valve .. once they are removed , then you can close the valve and switch to the Vapor management side using the SS Gate valve
Here is my point of confusion. There is no slant plate here. You are taking off Vapor? Then Condensing with Liebig.
To remove to hearts which should not have any contamination from the fores and heads . the rig is still sending liquid down the packing during this time ( it overflows on the bottom plate because the valve is closed)
Understand this also and you open the gate to remove a percentage of the vapor which is condensed in the second (liebig) condenser ..
Here is the Product/heart cut as a vapor condensed in the Liebig Then onto a jug. I was thinking you were taking off a liquid and was as confused as could be.
Sorry to beat it to death but I wanted to be sure I understood completely.
Re: Double checking
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:51 pm
by new_moonshiner
ImaDKrook wrote:new_moonshiner wrote:With the gate valve in the closed position the slanted plates work just as a LM rig would with everything being taken off from the smaller (brass Valve)
This I understand.
The procedure in operating the rig is to use the LM (liquid management ) operation to remove the foreshots and heads which is collected from the smaller brass valve .. once they are removed , then you can close the valve and switch to the Vapor management side using the SS Gate valve
Here is my point of confusion. There is no slant plate here. You are taking off Vapor? Then Condensing with Liebig.
To remove to hearts which should not have any contamination from the fores and heads . the rig is still sending liquid down the packing during this time ( it overflows on the bottom plate because the valve is closed)
Understand this also and you open the gate to remove a percentage of the vapor which is condensed in the second (liebig) condenser ..
Here is the Product/heart cut as a vapor condensed in the Liebig Then onto a jug. I was thinking you were taking off a liquid and was as confused as could be.
Sorry to beat it to death but I wanted to be sure I understood completely.
The procedure in operating the rig is to use the LM (liquid management ) operation to remove the foreshots and heads which is collected from the smaller brass valve .. once they are removed , then you can close the valve and switch to the Vapor management side using the SS Gate valve
Here is my point of confusion. There is no slant plate here. You are taking off Vapor? Then Condensing with Liebig.
Answer"
yes closing the small valve )brass one) and opening the gate way SS large one .. and then using the second condenser (liebig) to condense the vapor.
To remove to hearts which should not have any contamination from the fores and heads . the rig is still sending liquid down the packing during this time ( it overflows on the bottom plate because the valve is closed)
Understand this also and you open the gate to remove a percentage of the vapor which is condensed in the second (liebig) condenser ..
Here is the Product/heart cut as a vapor condensed in the Liebig Then onto a jug. I was thinking you were taking off a liquid and was as confused as could be.
Answer:
I do take off and remove the liquid but its done with the small brass valve this is the one with the slant pate . look closely at the pic you should see the plates outline .. when i finished taking off what i want with the small valve I close it off completely .. not used anymore during the run .. then everything from here on out goes through the liebg
I should have mentioned that I have two slanted plates reason being I have liquid coming down from both sides of the condenser with the TEE design ..
Re: VM Project
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:55 pm
by ImaDKrook
I see one slant plate for thermometer well. The well is underneath the slant plate. There is also a second slant plate for the takeoff. This would be a liquid. All cuts as a liquid. This is a different design than what you are doing? If so which is best?
I am finally understanding you were taking off as a vapor. Initially I was convinced you were taking of as a liquid. I could clearly see there are two plates.... Read your edit above and don't feel so dumb now... ok still just a little.
Sorry to nag but I want my equipment to be correct.
Krook
Photo borrowed from
http://homedistiller.org/forum/viewtopi ... =17&t=5829
Re: VM Project
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 6:17 pm
by new_moonshiner
the condenser at the top condenses the alcohol vapor, any condensed vapors (liquid alcohol) that drops from the coil (top condenser) hits on the first plate forcing it onto the second plate .. any liquid that misses the first plate will hit onto the second plate .. this is where I was talking about a long drop higher the drop the more its going to splash .. everything ends up on the bottom plate . you want a little space between the plates .. closer they are the more restriction for the vapor to make its way to the cold condenser coil. you are creating ..
Then either you take off small drops at a time ( more reading required ) or leave the valve closed and once it fills up the the notch in the plate it drips onto the packing ...( full reflux ) everything goes onto the packing . nothing being taken off .
now which design ? I cant answer that. its what you like. most of us think we have the best design that we could have for the most part .. but in the end we get the same result . the pic that you just posted will be simpler to build than the rig I posted by far .. have a look at those links to Bokakobs designs and maybe get some better ideas of what would suit you and your skill level...
Re: VM Project
Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:12 am
by ibfestus
WOW!!! That is beautiful. I wish I had the patience and skill to duplicate your project... But hey, I ain't dead yet!!
Re: VM Project
Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 2:25 pm
by new_moonshiner
patience was key on that project for sure ..
Re: VM Project
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:13 am
by guillermo
Wow, what a nice job. Two questions: what solder and/or brazing rod, flux did you use for this build? Also, just out of curiosity, why did you opt for the slant plates instead of the dam in Harry's design?
Your system of placing the round plates with the 21 holes slightly inside the tube makes a lot of sense because when you solder on the end caps, there's no chance of melting the solder on the inside.
Great work!
Re: VM Project
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:09 am
by new_moonshiner
All of the solder joints were made with sil-fos 15 percent silver refrigeration solder as we call it .. WITH the exception of the two caps that went on the ends ..those were made with soft lead free solder .
My thinking was it would be so much easier to remove the soft solder if I had problems that it would be the hard solder .. also using the soft solder for the caps you are not running the risk of having the plates loosen and leak...
One of the thoughts on the plates instead of the dam, was I like the idea of being able to drop everything out of the well if need be , the valve is in the lowest possible point in the well.. For me the plates were easier to solder than the dam method would have been .. but we all have different thoughts when it comes to this stuff.
I would like to thank Harry again for sharing his idea on this design , and some other suggestions as well with the liebig . I for one respect people that have a genuine interest in developing new ideas and better ways of doing things when it comes to this hobby/art. ( and sharing them for free )
Opposed to some looking to make bucks $$ or passing things off like its Government top secret information,
Re: VM Project
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:47 am
by guillermo
Did you use the silfos without any flux? Also for the spaces on the 2" discs around the 21 tubes, what size silfos 15 did you find best, .125 or .062? I just completed brazing 3" discs for a tube and shell condenser using a flux coated brazing rod, Safety-Silv 45 which is also very expensive. Seeing your results with silfos, I think I'll try it on future projects because your results look so nice and because of price.
Thanks for the information!
Regards,
Guillermo
Re: VM Project
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:10 pm
by new_moonshiner
no flux at all with the silfos. I have used the sticks you are talking about that have the flux on the sticks orange and pink colors I think .. But in this case I found the plain 15 percent rods worked fine .. the 45% solder I have used as well , not a good application for this project .. only flux that i used was on the soft solder connection...
lso something to keep in mind when soldering all those tubes together to the plates is, try to solder the plate as one .. not a small sharp flame but something like a turbo torch , once you get the solder flowing it will flow to the joints .. keep the flame moving around all the time and all over the plate, then when you get ready to solder the plate in place apply heat from the outside , with the solder stick on the opposite side ..
Re: VM Project
Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 4:04 am
by guillermo
Thanks for the advice. I'll get some silfos. I had solder problems on the crossflow I built a few months ago and ended up brazing on the endcaps which were butted to the 2" disks. I put the dam in mine and made the rig modular so I can remove the section with the 1 inch gate valve that goes to the liebig. I mainly use it on a short column (about 1 foot high) for stripping and final runs for rum and whiskey. It works great and I too would like to thank Harry again for sharing his design.
Re: VM Project
Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 10:51 pm
by olddog
I love copper porn, fantastic job.
Re: VM Project
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 12:04 am
by blanikdog
What a fantastic job and post. I feel quite humbled.
blanik
Re: VM Project
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 5:17 am
by new_moonshiner
thank you for the kind comments guys, I look at it as a project as something that most here could build without much of a problem IF they were willing to sacrifice the time and had the patience . I was pleased with the end result, But if I did another it would be a little better as would another one after that .. its just the way I do things .. being whatever task I have at hand ..
I guess Im never 100 percent satisfied with much of anything I do , But it keeps me keeping on to do better ...
Good Day ..
NM