I am looking around for large diameter copper tube and most suppliers in uk only go up to 54 mm / 2inch
Would i be losing out by buying this size , should i continue to search for 3 or 4 inch ??
I would be looking more towards making vodka i think mostly , can reflux be forced into 54mm dia'
Cheers for advise on this , i did search around to see if this question has been posted before :-/
Column diameter
Moderator: Site Moderator
-
- retired
- Posts: 2451
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 11:34 am
- Location: UK, in the heather
Re: Column diameter
54mm is the standard for a reflux colum in the UK. Using conventional packing (stainless scrubbers) it should be good for about 0.75 litres/hour @ 1.5kW
If you incorporate the various "tuning" techniques you can push the output to 2-3 litres/hour.
If you go down the SPP route you can use more power and get equivalent purity on a shorter column. Increasing diameter does not improve the purity but it does increase the production rate.
If you incorporate the various "tuning" techniques you can push the output to 2-3 litres/hour.
If you go down the SPP route you can use more power and get equivalent purity on a shorter column. Increasing diameter does not improve the purity but it does increase the production rate.
-
- Novice
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 7:24 am
Re: Column diameter
Thankyou ,
If you could just let me know what spp is ?
I will run with a 54mm build and if that big bit of tube crosses my path i will grab it for a future biggy
If you could just let me know what spp is ?
I will run with a 54mm build and if that big bit of tube crosses my path i will grab it for a future biggy

-
- Novice
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 7:24 am
Re: Column diameter
Found it
spiral prismatic packing ,
Another word for pot scrubbers i guess

Another word for pot scrubbers i guess

-
- retired
- Posts: 2451
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 11:34 am
- Location: UK, in the heather
Re: Column diameter
NO. Pot scrubers are the standard home packing material. SPP is much more like a commercial packing material. It is more expensive but a lot more efficient. It can tollerate higher vapour speeds which is why it can be used on a smaller diameter column than scrubbers.Stingrayjay wrote:Found itspiral prismatic packing ,
Another word for pot scrubbers i guess
You can get the same sort of performance with a column 1/3 of the packed height when using SPP when compared to conventional scrubbers. But it is more expensive.
-
- Novice
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 7:24 am
Re: Column diameter
I am soaking this all up like a sponge , so what kind of shop would i find a bag of SPP , i know i should get some in stock now 
Cheers
Jay

Cheers
Jay