![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Looking at reflux designs and from what I have read (emphasised in kiwistiller's basic overview article) the real benefit of VM over LM is the ability to control (or set) the reflux ratio once for the duration of the distillation, whilst in LM requires alteration of a valve to control (with a little guessing) the ratio as condensate diminishes.
The question I have is if you could set the split ratio of the condensate from the reflux condenser (rather than the obviously easier vapour ratio) do you end up with the same benefits of a VM system? ie is it just that the valving on an LM is limited to flow rate control independent of supply. Or are there a multitude of other reasons for a VM over LM other than RR that I am missing?
I was thinking about ways of controlling reflux ratios from a LM perspective that are (1) flow independent (2) allow better calculated ratios and (3) can provide more than 1:1 (or as per build hardware) if required. Really just a modified Bokakob or slant plate with ratio option replacing the flow control.
Ok so feel free to start correcting me now!
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)