email from Brewhaus

This forum is used by 1000's of people from dozens of countries. Please observe the rules, we all want to get along and contribute in a graceful manner.

Moderator: Site Moderator

User avatar
thecroweater
retired
Posts: 6104
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 9:04 am
Location: Central Highlands Vic. Australia

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by thecroweater »

Firstly thing that needs changing is the media's approach and through them public perception. No one bothers to report the thousands upon thousands of backyard mechanics those cars catch fire or blown up half their shed every yr but some clueless shiner that has a mishap is front page for a week. Its deliberate and its pretty much world wide . not much will change wile this ancient craft is portrayed as risky and dangerous. We Ozzies think of our selves as liberal and free and does most of the English speaking world, but the NZers got us on toast in this field. Naturally my view is your have an undeniable natural right to procurer your own food and beverage and any law contrary to that is morally corrupt.
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin
seabass
Rumrunner
Posts: 626
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:08 am

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by seabass »

There doesn't seem to be any organized movement for legalizing home distilling. Or am I missing something?
chrisc69
Novice
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 9:43 am

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by chrisc69 »

thecroweater wrote:Firstly thing that needs changing is the media's approach and through them public perception. No one bothers to report the thousands upon thousands of backyard mechanics those cars catch fire or blown up half their shed every yr but some clueless shiner that has a mishap is front page for a week. Its deliberate and its pretty much world wide . not much will change wile this ancient craft is portrayed as risky and dangerous. We Ozzies think of our selves as liberal and free and does most of the English speaking world, but the NZers got us on toast in this field. Naturally my view is your have an undeniable natural right to procurer your own food and beverage and any law contrary to that is morally corrupt.
so true their if we legalized it for personal use their is a opening for better education and hopefully would clean up the way people look at this hobbie i would pay for what i make if they made it which they dont and seaming as i can make it for a few bucks a bottle they would have to make it cheap lol

i think its time for a change but i doubt that will happen in my life time figures crossed though
chrisc69
Novice
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 9:43 am

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by chrisc69 »

on 1 note you can go legal on making your own hootch in OZ but you need to register your still pay tax on each liter of spirit that it produces its like $80 per liter something like that at 95% i cant remember all details but that is the basic outline of it
User avatar
thecroweater
retired
Posts: 6104
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 9:04 am
Location: Central Highlands Vic. Australia

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by thecroweater »

I would not pay one damn red cent for anything I make for myself, to hell with that and yeah In Oz it is for all intensive purposes impossible to get a licence for personal use, technically you can but in practice no one has ever been issued with one. Worries me not either way why should I have to buy a licence to do what morally is my right, imagine you had to get a licence and pay GST to grow your own vegies, no diff. Home brewers don't have to go though that crap nor do wine makers why the hell should you have to just because you choose to refine the toxins out from those said beverages, I'd prefer the statis quo to that :thumbup:
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin
chrisc69
Novice
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 9:43 am

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by chrisc69 »

thecroweater wrote:I would not pay one damn red cent for anything I make for myself, to hell with that and yeah In Oz it is for all intensive purposes impossible to get a licence for personal use, technically you can but in practice no one has ever been issued with one. Worries me not either way why should I have to buy a licence to do what morally is my right, imagine you had to get a licence and pay GST to grow your own vegies, no diff. Home brewers don't have to go though that crap nor do wine makers why the hell should you have to just because you choose to refine the toxins out from those said beverages, I'd prefer the statis quo to that :thumbup:
yeah that is why i don't have a licence i wont pay that much for a stupid licence you have said everything i feel the same way they can shove that idea up their back sides i wouldn't mind say a registration fee say $50 a year for book keeping etc like you need for reptiles but that price is bs

sorry for going off topic people
Bayou-Ruler
Distiller
Posts: 1703
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 4:50 pm
Location: SW Louisiana

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by Bayou-Ruler »

The list are due by approximately June 5th........................

http://www.brewhausforum.com/showthread ... #post26734" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
Bayou Ethanol
Ethanol Fuel Producer

AFP-LA-15027
http://www.BayouEthanol.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
seaguy
Swill Maker
Posts: 221
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:13 am
Location: Bottoma,AL

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by seaguy »

Okay :esurprised:
Last edited by seaguy on Wed May 29, 2013 3:58 am, edited 2 times in total.
2" x 5' Boka, 3/8" coil on 3/4" cold finger, SS 15gal 240v 5.5kw sand element, Tincup's NE555 controller.
mash rookie
Angel's Share
Angel's Share
Posts: 2228
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 8:20 am
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by mash rookie »

Content deleted
Last edited by mash rookie on Tue May 28, 2013 9:32 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
drinkingdog
Rumrunner
Posts: 607
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 7:16 pm
Location: over yonder

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by drinkingdog »

+1 MR
My Grandpa used to say. Don't argue with an idiot, because he will just drag you down to his level then beat you with experience.
He also used to say. I didn't say it was your fault. I just said that I was blaming you.

DD
Paracelsus
Novice
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:00 pm
Location: Ceres

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by Paracelsus »

Content deleted
Last edited by Paracelsus on Tue May 28, 2013 9:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Rastus
Rumrunner
Posts: 694
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by Rastus »

i never did buy a still but i bought a milk can. and i spoke with the dealer and was told this:

uncle sam wants to know who has the items with serial numbers on it.
if you have a item with a serial number keep er clean if you do not have a permit.

my milk can got no serial number.

to make an analogy with parts of a gun. take an ar 15, you can buy a upper barrel and receiver through the mail, but the lower receiver frame is numbered and controlled and a licensed dealer or agent must call in the purchase of the item . one peice of metal, with a serial number. all the parts that screw on or bolt on are not regulated (yet) the part with the serial number is the one the feds want.

so it eases my mind a bit in that perspective, but i think sometimes we let down the guard a bit, and need to maintain a bit of paranoia to stay out of trouble.

that being said let me go answer the door and see who is knocking :think:
She was just a moonshiner,
But he loved her Still
McShiner
Novice
Posts: 73
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 3:03 pm

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by McShiner »

For the most part, many here will be doing this for personal consumption - OK, I am sure they get that. However 1) we (in general) have given away free likker to friends/family, and this reduces tax/production profits unfairly. 2) it is still illegal - to hide under "I only make for myself" would open the door to all sorts of illegal substance production.
AGREE!
In my mind the person down the road who is selling tomatoes, blueberries, pumpkins, used tires, firewood, or whatever else, at the roadside and not claiming the income is guiltier than I am for making my own wine and spirits that I consume in the privacy of my own home... Are they going to start coming after folks in states that tax groceries for growing their own vegetables, raising their own meat animals, or keeping chickens for fresh eggs...??? Hell No...!!!
AGREE!
Ironic that the roadside stands are mostly regenerated crops that keep coming back every season. We, on the other hand, have to purchase AND PAY TAXES on fresh grains, corn, yeast (if we don't regenerate our own), city water bills (have taxes on them), all the parts and pieces that we buy at the local "do it yourself" stores to build our rigs. And as stated in the first quote, we are only doing this for "personal consumption" for which we have already been taxed out the wa-zoo.

Just thought I'd throw another stone in the pond, just in case we started seeing our reflections on the surface again.

McS.
aka-LowKey

p.s.
It almost the same as my retired military pension. The US citizens' taxes paid my military paycheck which I paid taxes on. Now the taxes ALL of us paid, pay my military pension...WHICH IS TAXED! AHHHHHHH!
Attachments
implied facepalm.jpg
implied facepalm.jpg (8.14 KiB) Viewed 3805 times
Last edited by McShiner on Tue May 28, 2013 11:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
rad14701
retired
Posts: 20865
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 4:46 pm
Location: New York, USA

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by rad14701 »

Very valid point, McShiner... We've already paid tax on most ingredients... Sometimes we have to spell things out so the powers that be get it...

Water - taxed or untaxed
Nutrients - taxed or untaxed
Sugar - taxed or untaxed
Grains - taxed
Propane - taxed
Electricity - taxed
Hardware - taxed
Patience - taxed :lolno:

So my spirits, produced for my own personal consumption, are already taxed enough... :problem: There is very little chance that any hobby distiller is going to make totally untaxed spirits... :thumbdown:

Has anyone ever wondered where all the liquor tax goes...???
jeepkidd
Bootlegger
Posts: 140
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:03 am

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by jeepkidd »

If they had a rule in place for manufacturers to keep records for 3yrs, wouldn't it make sense for them to hit up the manufacturers every 3yrs and keep their own list forever? Data storage is cheap.

Most of us have invested more $ in our equipment then the liquor we will make in a long time. I really doubt we are the ones they are worried about. If they cross reference estimated liquor consumption with your area with liquor imported, or find some establishments which report much lower liquor sales then they would expect, then people with distilling equipment could be added to their investigation around where the liquor is coming from. It all goes back to the basic 'rules' Don't Sell & Don't Tell.
Cheers!
User avatar
LWTCS
Site Mod
Posts: 12965
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:04 pm
Location: Treasure Coast

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by LWTCS »

They are targeting "real" moonshiners IMO.

I betcha legit likker sales are at record highs in spite of all this new "moonshining".
Trample the injured and hurdle the dead.
User avatar
Jimbo
retired
Posts: 8423
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:19 pm
Location: Down the road a piece.

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by Jimbo »

rad14701 wrote: Has anyone ever wondered where all the liquor tax goes...???
Someone has to fund retirement at full salary after a single term for the politicians.
In theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice there is.
My Bourbon and Single Malt recipes. Apple Stuff and Electric Conversion
Clearwater
Bootlegger
Posts: 127
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 10:45 am
Location: Land of the free?

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by Clearwater »

They're trying to fend off Sequestration and have a reason to continue work...
Paracelsus
Novice
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:00 pm
Location: Ceres

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by Paracelsus »

All these theories about the reasons are fine and dandy but what should any of us DO?
User avatar
jholmz
Distiller
Posts: 1245
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 10:18 pm
Location: U.S. Midwest corn belt

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by jholmz »

Paracelsus wrote:All these theories about the reasons are fine and dandy but what should any of us DO?
nothing you can do if you bought your still they have your name. if your scared shut it down and quit the hobby otherwise its buisiness as usual
Doogie
Trainee
Posts: 750
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 12:25 pm

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by Doogie »

Paracelsus wrote:All these theories about the reasons are fine and dandy but what should any of us DO?
put the thing somewhere else for a while.

Reasons are irrelevant. Rhetoric is irrelevant. What matters is they are investigating and using proven information to look for what is really illegal activity. Your beliefs will be irrelevant. I cannot believe a judge will deny a search warrant with a "we have evidence (exhibit A thru D) of a purchase and delivery of still capable of producing illegal alcohol and is outside of the maximum permitted still size"
LTV - "keep in mind distilling is like masturbating. You do one wrong and you go blind."

Want to keep people from consulting idiots on youTube about distilling?? Don't be an idiot when someone asks for advice ... Help them
ATXknife
Novice
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 3:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by ATXknife »

I've been thinking of doing this as a hobby for some time. Today, I found this forum and began reading. I read the email from Brewhaus and went to their website. I just ordered a Pro Series 2 and am looking forward to its arrival. I appreciate people who stand up for their customers and now, I look forward to reading this forum.
seabass
Rumrunner
Posts: 626
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:08 am

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by seabass »

Uhhhh...you do realize that while they are sticking up for their customers as much as possible by notifying everyone of the situation, they are still sending the list of customers to the feds right?

That purchase might not have been the best decision...
ATXknife
Novice
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 3:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by ATXknife »

Do you see where they have any other choice? He's running a business. He has to comply. It is up to everyone else to stand up for their rights and put an end to this mischief. Just remember, he could have just kept quiet about it. But that's ok, I'm the newbie. Just saying....I've got his back.
User avatar
drinkingdog
Rumrunner
Posts: 607
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 7:16 pm
Location: over yonder

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by drinkingdog »

Doogie wrote:
Paracelsus wrote:All these theories about the reasons are fine and dandy but what should any of us DO?
put the thing somewhere else for a while.

Reasons are irrelevant. Rhetoric is irrelevant. What matters is they are investigating and using proven information to look for what is really illegal activity. Your beliefs will be irrelevant. I cannot believe a judge will deny a search warrant with a "we have evidence (exhibit A thru D) of a purchase and delivery of still capable of producing illegal alcohol and is outside of the maximum permitted still size"
Besides the fact that person hasn't applied for any kind of a permit. Doesn't look good. Manufacturers step up and start the movement towards legalization. Work toward protecting your customers and your business
My Grandpa used to say. Don't argue with an idiot, because he will just drag you down to his level then beat you with experience.
He also used to say. I didn't say it was your fault. I just said that I was blaming you.

DD
Bayou-Ruler
Distiller
Posts: 1703
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 4:50 pm
Location: SW Louisiana

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by Bayou-Ruler »

Well now that the TTB will have everyone who purchased a distillers Name and address, why not apply for a AFP permit? Then you wont have to worry. The big deal all along with most people as far as applying for a permit was disclosing your information. They are about to have your information anyway............... :wtf:
Bayou Ethanol
Ethanol Fuel Producer

AFP-LA-15027
http://www.BayouEthanol.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
WIski
Rumrunner
Posts: 726
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by WIski »

+1 Bayou

If your going to stay in the game thats a great thought there...... :eugeek: :clap:
chrisc69
Novice
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 9:43 am

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by chrisc69 »

Bayou-Ruler wrote:Well now that the TTB will have everyone who purchased a distillers Name and address, why not apply for a AFP permit? Then you wont have to worry. The big deal all along with most people as far as applying for a permit was disclosing your information. They are about to have your information anyway............... :wtf:
i wish we could get this but we cant so that suck ill continue i have built my stills anyway
Doogie
Trainee
Posts: 750
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 12:25 pm

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by Doogie »

ATXknife wrote:Do you see where they have any other choice? He's running a business. He has to comply. It is up to everyone else to stand up for their rights and put an end to this mischief. Just remember, he could have just kept quiet about it. But that's ok, I'm the newbie. Just saying....I've got his back.
I can understand your support for the builder - and yes, they did the best thing by the clients to inform everyone.

However, to correct your statement, we have no "right" to produce likker. It is not like gun ownership, gay marriage, etc, etc - there is no law or anything giving you the right to make likker just because you feel you should be allowed to.

Until people realize this, that they have no "right", they expose themselves and immediate family to prosecution and asset losses. Go ahead, stand up for your "rights" and see where it gets you.

Smart people are relocating these stills they bought online. They are also relocating aging products and keeping a small portion that at worst will get them a fine for possessing shine in small quantities. They may also be wailing on those fermenters to spit out mash/wash fast so they can build a hidden inventory to get thru this. Then, a year or so after they come and knock on yer door, these people will sneak their stills out and replenish their inventory.

Not so brilliant people will be standing in front of their running still with a shotgun and a huge inventory when the cops arrive, ready to defend their "right to produce likker" :roll:
LTV - "keep in mind distilling is like masturbating. You do one wrong and you go blind."

Want to keep people from consulting idiots on youTube about distilling?? Don't be an idiot when someone asks for advice ... Help them
Doogie
Trainee
Posts: 750
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 12:25 pm

Re: email from Brewhaus

Post by Doogie »

As for the online builders getting together to legalize this, I do not believe 1) it is fair to lump it on them and 2) that they can afford to. You would need to get both builders and users to get together and fund the drive.

Builders only get you, really, once - when you buy a still. The rest of the time you probably only buy, maybe, some yeast/ingredients, hydro/alcoholmeters, little things. Many people decide to build their own contraptions and as such the builder rarely sees anything from those people. Yes, a legalized distilling law would increase their sales, but to put the entire cost on them for a potential unknown future profit that may or may not appear would be a bad business decision

It has to be everyone contributing ...
LTV - "keep in mind distilling is like masturbating. You do one wrong and you go blind."

Want to keep people from consulting idiots on youTube about distilling?? Don't be an idiot when someone asks for advice ... Help them
Post Reply