


Moderator: Site Moderator
You can't run any reflux column accurately without a temp probexx7777xx wrote: Do I need a thermometer in the head of my VM? Based on what I've read on VM's it would be more of a "nice to have" than something you absolutely need to operate the rig.
I used a 1/2 inch valve on the last column and it will go way too fast with that. A gate valve is a better option but much heavier and seriously more money. I like the lightest weight design hanging of the side of the column. That's also why I drop straight down and kick out at the bottom. It keeps everything in better balance. (lower center of gravity)manu de hanoi wrote:use a gate valve instead of a ball valve, it's more accurate and has less plastic in it. Otherwise I feel a 1'' valve would be more suitable. Minime ? which diameter would you recommend for a 2'' column without reducer?
I've never measured R/R. To me it is one of those theoretical things that are nice to know but have very little value to the actual operation. When making neutral I simply go with 100% temperature control. If the temperature is stable I know the product is also. Running on propane also presents the problem of never knowing your actual power input. That's why VM works so well for me. There's only one thing you need to know and that is temperature.pintoshine wrote: Without the ability to measure unrefluxed take off rate it is hard to determine the reflux ratio directly and this makes it more difficult to operate other than experimentally
This is because you were running the takeoff rate too close to the full takeoff rate from the beginning. If you are running straight molasses wash you would have been making rum flavored spirits running this way. The stacking capability of either of these still depends on a slow take off rate compared to the max takeoff rate. Once you are able to determine the proper reflux rate for really clean ethanol, then you will have a set and forget situation with either.minime wrote:On LM column the temperature starts to climb immediately in the reduced output stage (mine did anyway) because the takeoff rate remains the same and there is less reflux.
Aw come on Pint. 95.6 surely works for fuel but I'll stack my fuel against anything available from the store. I've said all along that dead neutral is just not required for my palette.pintoshine wrote:I know I am making absolutely neutral alcohol in the heart run, and not just high proof fuel grade alcohol.
Wowpintoshine wrote: If I were to open mine up and run close to full output I can get 12L/hour of 95%
I know right where the dead neutral point is. 2 Liters per hour is dead neutral but it's still only 95.6. I just don't need it that clean. For a guy who likes rum and whiskey why do you need to have it dead neutral??pintoshine wrote:So since now you have told us the full story of why you don't like the LM design, maybe you should revisit your comparison, run each for high quality. .
Momma has come to rely on itpintoshine wrote:If you are running straight molasses wash you would have been making rum flavored spirits running this way.
Yes, I agree that your product is as clean or cleaner than store bought. Unfortunately, I have developed a taste for ultra clean vodka. I wouldn't even argue personal preference with you but I do believe than there are a lot on here after that ultimately clean refreshing flavor that smells and tastes like the purest Canadian, possibly Norwegian for those in Minnesotaminime wrote:Aw come on Pint. 95.6 surely works for fuel but I'll stack my fuel against anything available from the store. I've said all along that dead neutral is just not required for my palette.
I guess I missed that part or it just didn't sink in that you were running for speed rather than purity.minime wrote:at no point did I try and mislead anyone as to my intention. I've cautioned several times that I like to run hard and fast.
I agree and I think other are paying lots of attention judging from the hit count on the pictures. I am glad we hammered it out that our goals were different and our rating criteria were also different.minime wrote:This is a terrific thread. Thanks to X7 for starting it.
Vertical, I usually equalize 20 to 30 minutes and it only accumulates 15 to 20 ml during that time. Once the branch is up to temp it doesn't condense anything there until you open the valve. I like to keep everything close to the column for balance. I have to tear down after every run and re-assemble for each run so balance is important to me. These big columns as unwieldy and I'm not getting any younger.pintoshine wrote: Is your valve on your VM horizontal or vertical?
Absolutely, when I first lit up the inverted funnel column it was running 2 liters per hour max. Pretty amazing product but for me it's a compromise I'm not willing to make.pintoshine wrote:and those who are after the holy grail of Canadian Snowfall Vodka, there is a lesson here.
I used a a roll of copper mesh to pack my column. If you're in the US here is where I got my packing:TopDog wrote:How many scrubbers did you pack your column with? Great set up looks like it can get the job done!
Hey anyone know of a cheap place to get copper scrubbers?
from the website...xx7777xx wrote:I used a a roll of copper mesh to pack my column. If you're in the US here is where I got my packing:TopDog wrote:How many scrubbers did you pack your column with? Great set up looks like it can get the job done!
Hey anyone know of a cheap place to get copper scrubbers?
http://www.brewhaus.com/Copper-Mesh-P947C94.aspx
Razorsharpedge wrote: In your design it looks as though the VM valve is part of the liebig condenser assembly and attaches to the pot still. Is there some sort of safety feature to prevent pressure build up should the valve accidentally be closed during stripping and pot stilling?
Best regards,
Razorsharpedge
xx7777xx wrote:Jody:
I'm not sure of your exact setup, but if your valve is connected to your leibig as is mine, don't forget to add a safety release (see cork on top of pot still head).
-x7