Whats yalls take on this contraption?
Moderator: Site Moderator
- Tater
- Admin
- Posts: 9821
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:19 am
- Location: occupied south
Whats yalls take on this contraption?
http://www.greensteamengine.com/licenses.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow
I use a pot still.Sometimes with a thumper
-
- Trainee
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 11:57 am
- Location: 1000 acre farm, Ohio
Neat little thing. I wonder if these be scaled up to provide power for the electric grid via biomass fuel and be used in a water desalination plant at the same time. Two birds, one stone.
"If you can't dazzle them with brilliance... baffle them with bullshit."
"Don't steal. The government hates competition."
"Believe none of what you hear, and only half of what you see"
20lt small pot still, working on keg
"Don't steal. The government hates competition."
"Believe none of what you hear, and only half of what you see"
20lt small pot still, working on keg
-
- Swill Maker
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 6:39 pm
- Location: Ontario
Creative Idea.
Too Many moving parts. The cylinders themselves are moving?

The cylinders seem to move in sync. Wouldn't this cause some serious vibrations in a real world application?
Anyways, I'm not a engineer so what do I know!
Looking at the animation makes me dizzy too

Too Many moving parts. The cylinders themselves are moving?

The cylinders seem to move in sync. Wouldn't this cause some serious vibrations in a real world application?
Anyways, I'm not a engineer so what do I know!

Looking at the animation makes me dizzy too



I started out with nothing, and I still have most of it left.
-
- Distiller
- Posts: 1093
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 9:16 am
- Location: not there
-
- Swill Maker
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 11:59 pm
-
- retired
- Posts: 20865
- Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 4:46 pm
- Location: New York, USA
I'd bank my money on the new Stirling Engine technologies... That isn't to say that the original theory is new... All you need is the sun to power them...
I have researched this design before and my summation was that while it looks relatively simple there are just too many factors to take into consideration - wear and vibration being two of the biggies... It's good to see that people are out there looking for alternative technologies, however...
I have researched this design before and my summation was that while it looks relatively simple there are just too many factors to take into consideration - wear and vibration being two of the biggies... It's good to see that people are out there looking for alternative technologies, however...
-
- retired
- Posts: 1432
- Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Humm.rad14701 wrote:I have researched this design before and my summation was that while it looks relatively simple there are just too many factors to take into consideration - wear and vibration being two of the biggies.
Why do ya say that when this design has less movin' parts then the older steam engines? It also has converted much of the reciprical action to rotary, that should help with wear and vibration. The site also goes on to say that they have made strides in lubrication.
I tend to be leary of simple, flat statements like the quote above... please qualify.
-
- retired
- Posts: 5628
- Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 8:38 am
- Location: OzLand
Not true. It wouldn't work if they moved in sync. Their strokes are offset by 120º (for the 3 cylinder version). The whole action depends on that differential.The cylinders seem to move in sync.
That is a good point.It also has converted much of the reciprical action to rotary, that should help with wear and vibration.
Gotta admit, when I first saw it, it just looked wrong. But after watching it several times it is starting to make a lot of sense.
Keeping the con rod straight through the whole cycle is a major advantage over conventional designs.
They do seem a little rough at low speed, but are quite smooth at high speed.
Be safe.
Be discreet.
And have fun.
Be discreet.
And have fun.
-
- Master of Distillation
- Posts: 3086
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 11:40 am
- Location: Texas
-
- Swill Maker
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 6:39 pm
- Location: Ontario
"Not true. It wouldn't work if they moved in sync."
I meant the cylinders themselves, not the pistons.
But now that someone mentions they are moving in a rotary motion - the same direction as the drive shaft - this might not be a problem for vibrations.
My apologies for posting the animation, I'm still getting dizzy looking at it
I meant the cylinders themselves, not the pistons.
But now that someone mentions they are moving in a rotary motion - the same direction as the drive shaft - this might not be a problem for vibrations.
My apologies for posting the animation, I'm still getting dizzy looking at it

I started out with nothing, and I still have most of it left.
-
- Rumrunner
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 2:30 pm
- Location: High Ground
-
- Bootlegger
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:20 pm
- Location: Mitten State, USA
Certainly an interesting concept, but I'm doubtful of the efficiency claims they make; simple thermodynamics limits the potential efficiency of a heat engine to a much lower value. For super heated steam at 600*C and 2MPa high side and 40*C low side (AKA generic big ass power plant, far exceeding small scale capacity), this efficiency tops off at around 50%. Smaller heat engines will have lower limits and worse efficiencies. It's a relatively simple expression of temperature and pressure. I'd love to see how they got past this basic obstruction.
Of course, if they could somehow prove it to be that efficient, that would change the entire energy landscape. It would arguably be the largest mechanical advancement in the last 50 years.
Of course, if they could somehow prove it to be that efficient, that would change the entire energy landscape. It would arguably be the largest mechanical advancement in the last 50 years.
-
- retired
- Posts: 1432
- Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Re: Whats yalls take on this contraption?
Hey RadEd,
I have a BIG interest in this design.
Earlier in this thread ya said, "I have researched this design before and my summation was that while it looks relatively simple there are just too many factors to take into consideration - wear and vibration being two of the biggies."
Please share this reaserch that ya did. Can ya be more specific about the wear and vibration problems?
I have a BIG interest in this design.
Earlier in this thread ya said, "I have researched this design before and my summation was that while it looks relatively simple there are just too many factors to take into consideration - wear and vibration being two of the biggies."
Please share this reaserch that ya did. Can ya be more specific about the wear and vibration problems?
-
- Swill Maker
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 7:46 pm
- Location: Paradise (aka Cairns Qld Australia)
Re: Whats yalls take on this contraption?
When I see all those moving parts I immediately think "wear & tear", "Friction = Heat = Metal Fatigue".
It's a neat engineering feat. But why go through the reciprocating step in the first place? What's wrong with very simple steam turbine? Immediate rotary motion, less moving parts, no stop/start action (with all that potential "fly-to-bits" energy & stress).
It's a neat engineering feat. But why go through the reciprocating step in the first place? What's wrong with very simple steam turbine? Immediate rotary motion, less moving parts, no stop/start action (with all that potential "fly-to-bits" energy & stress).
Slainte!
regards Harry
regards Harry
-
- Bootlegger
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:20 pm
- Location: Mitten State, USA
Re: Whats yalls take on this contraption?
Just wanted to clarify that your talking to rad14701 and not me, THM. I know were similar, but I was here first....I think
jk
I too would love to see more research data on this. Although a few of my own sources have also pegged those Sterling engines as big part of new energy. A buddy of mine on the U solar climber team says one of the other teams uses one of those Stirling engines, to a very powerful effect.

I too would love to see more research data on this. Although a few of my own sources have also pegged those Sterling engines as big part of new energy. A buddy of mine on the U solar climber team says one of the other teams uses one of those Stirling engines, to a very powerful effect.
-
- retired
- Posts: 20865
- Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 4:46 pm
- Location: New York, USA
Re: Whats yalls take on this contraption?
Yes, RadicalEd1, is was me that theholymackerel was referring to, not you...
Considering how my focus here is more on distillation than alternative propulsion systems, my summation will have to suffice in place of quantification of that summation... I have researched many different mechanical gizmos and aside from the visually fascinating aspect that the design in question provides, there are many others that I have found more intriguing... I'm more of a wind turbine kinda guy at the moment... I find miniature V-engines neat but the closest I ever got to that was cutting a V8 in half to make a functional V4 - but that was long ago...
Considering how my focus here is more on distillation than alternative propulsion systems, my summation will have to suffice in place of quantification of that summation... I have researched many different mechanical gizmos and aside from the visually fascinating aspect that the design in question provides, there are many others that I have found more intriguing... I'm more of a wind turbine kinda guy at the moment... I find miniature V-engines neat but the closest I ever got to that was cutting a V8 in half to make a functional V4 - but that was long ago...
-
- retired
- Posts: 1432
- Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Re: Whats yalls take on this contraption?
What?rad14701 wrote:Considering how my focus here is more on distillation than alternative propulsion systems, my summation will have to suffice in place of quantification of that summation.
So all we get is an off the cuff comment, and ya won't further yer explination?
Humm... and ya say ya actually researched this engine?
-
- Novice
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 4:01 pm
- Location: Seattle
Re: Whats yalls take on this contraption?
What it looks like to me is a variable diplacment hydraulic motor used in a hydrostatic transmission
Davy Dangerson
The Great Estimator Of Distance
The Great Estimator Of Distance
-
- Distiller
- Posts: 1324
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 5:55 pm
- Location: South
Re: Whats yalls take on this contraption?
davydangerson wrote:What it looks like to me is a variable diplacment hydraulic motor used in a hydrostatic transmission
That's exactly what I was thinking.
I got a neat alternative to the smaller versions of this, it includes a 1HP electric motor and a generator powered by foreshots and or heads. I never heard an internal combustion engine complaining with a hangover. There's my 2 shiney Lincolns.
15 gallon pot still, 2"x18" column with liebeg condensor on propane.
Modified Charles 803 w/ 50gal boiler, never ran so far.
Modified Charles 803 w/ 50gal boiler, never ran so far.